Search

Background: Immunosuppressive therapies as azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rituximab (RTX) are widely prescribed as first-line treatment to prevent relapses in NMOSD. However, the rate of response to these traditional therapies is unknown in Argentina. We aimed to describe and compare treatment failure rates in NMOSD patients included in the Argentinean MS and NMOSD registry (RelevarEM, NCT03375177)., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in NMOSD patients included in RelevarEM (a nationwide, longitudinal, observational, non-mandatory registry of MS and NMOSD in Argentina). NMOSD patients were defined based on validate diagnostic criteria. Only NMOSD patients who received AZA or MMF for at least 6 months or RTX for at least 1 month were included. Patients who were receiving AZA, MMF, or RTX and then switched to another 1 of these 3 therapies were included if the above-mentioned criteria for each drug were fulfilled. Data on patient demographics, clinical, neuroradiological findings, and treatments administered were collected. Treatment failure was defined as any new attack/relapse that occurred despite immunosuppressive treatment., Results: We included 139 NMOSD patients who were receiving AZA (n = 105), MMF (n = 5) or RTX (n = 29) with a mean follow-up time of 41.3 ± 11.4 months and median of EDSS at treatment initiation of 3. We observed a reduction in the annualized relapse rate from pre-treatment to post-treatment of 51.1 %, 48.4 %, and 79.1 % respectively with a Hazard Risk relative to RTX (95 % CI) of 1.67 (1.34-3.54, p = 0.01) for AZA and 2.01 (1.86-4.43, p = 0.008) for MMF. AZA, MMF and RTX failure was observed in 45/105 (42.8 %), 2/5 (40 %) and 3/29 (10.3 %) patients, respectively., Conclusions: Treatment failure rates were higher for AZA and MMF than RTX in Argentinean NMOSD patients in a real-world setting. High-efficacy treatment increases the opportunity to prevent attacks of NMOSD., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) can be classified according to the efficacy in which they prevent inflammatory activity. To date, there are limited data regarding the use of high-efficacy treatments (HETs) in Latin America (LATAM). We aimed to analyze the use of HETs in Argentina, focusing on the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of the patients who use these treatments and the changes in the trend of use over the years., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was done using the Argentina MS patient registry, RelevarEM. Patients diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) according to validated diagnostic criteria and under treatment with natalizumab, alemtuzumab, cladribine, rituximab or ocrelizumab were included., Results: Out of 2450 RRMS patients under a DMT, 462 (19%) were on HETs. One third of those patients (35%) received HETs as the first treatment. The most frequent reason for switching to HETs was treatment failure to previous DMT (77%). The time from MS diagnosis to the first HET in treatment-naive patients was less than one year (IQR: 0-1 year) and in treatment-experienced patients it was 5 years (IQR: 3-9 years). Between 2015 and 2017 (P1), 729 patients included in RelevarEM started a new treatment, of which 85 (11.65%) were HETs. Between 2018 and 2020 (P2), 961 patients included in RelevarEM started a new treatment, of which 284 (29.55%) were HETs. When comparing P2 with P1, a significant increase in the use of HETs was observed (p < 0.01). The most frequently used HETs were alemtuzumab (50.59%) in P1, and cladribine (45.20%) in P2., Conclusion: The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients under HET in Argentina were identified. Based on a real-world setting, we found a significant trend towards and a rapid increase in the use of HETs in clinical practice in patients with RRMS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Irrestrictive research grants from Biogen Argentina, Genzyme Argentina, Merck Argentina, Novartis Argentina, and Roche Argentina allowed the development and implementation of the RELEVAREM Registry. Those grants did not interfere in the development plan, variables, PI selection, patient information nor other aspects of the Registry. Authors declare no conflict of interest with the research done., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

The objective of the study was to evaluate the incidence of COVID-19 after complete vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) included in the Argentinean MS and NMOSD registry (RelevarEM, NCT03375177)., Methods: cohort study conducted between May 2021 and December 2021. The primary outcome was the appearance of infection during the follow-up time (at least three months after complete vaccination (second dose)). Data was collected through the contact between the treating physician and the patient. Specific information was requested (date, symptoms, need for hospitalization, ventilatory assistance, treatment, and evolution). The contact was made every 30 days during the period of 3 months after the full dose vaccination. A positive COVID-19 case was defined according to the definition established by the Ministry of Health in Argentina. Cumulative incidence was reported by Kaplan Meier survival curves as well as incidence density., Results: A total of 576 PwMS were included, mean age 45.2 ± 13 years, 432 (75%) RRMS, 403 (70%) were female. The mean and median time of follow-up after the second dose was 91 ± 17 and 94 ± 21 days respectively. Most frequent first and second dose received was Astra-Zeneca vaccine, followed by Sputnik V vaccine. During follow-up a total of twenty COVID-19 cases were observed for a total exposure time of 39,557 days. The overall cumulative incidence for the observed period was 3.4% (SE 0.4%) with an overall incidence density of 5 × 10.000 patients/day (95%CI 0.7-12). We observed more cases in woman than men with an incidence density of 6 × 10.000 patients/day (95%CI 0.9-9) vs. 3 × 10.000 patients/day (95%CI 0.2-6) respectively, but not significantly different (IRR 1.7 95% CI 0.56-7.37 p = 0.15)., Conclusion: we found an incidence density of breakthrough COVID-19 infection of 5 × 10.000 patients/day (95%CI 0.7-12) after vaccination in Argentina., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Authors declare no potential conflicts of interest regarding this research, authorship and/or publication of this article. We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome, (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In multiple sclerosis demographics there is a well-known female prevalence and male patients have been less specifically evaluated in clinical studies, though some clinical differences have been reported between sexes., Objective: The objective of this study was to assess clinical and demographic differences between male and female patients included in the national Argentine MS Registry-RelevarEM., Material and Methods: This study was observational, retrospective, and was based on the data of 3099 MS patients included as of 04 April 2021. The statistical analysis plan included bivariate analyses with the crude data and also after adjustment for the MS phenotype, further categorized as progressive-onset MS or relapsing-onset MS. In the adjusted analysis, the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio was compared to the crude odds ratio, to account for the phenotype as a confounder., Results: The data from 1,074 (34.7%) men and 2,025 (65.3%) women with MS diagnosis were analysed. Males presented primary progressive disease two times more often than women (11% and 5%, respectively). In the crude analyses by sex, the presence of exclusively infratentorial lesions in the magnetic resonance imaging studies was more frequent in males than in females, but after adjustment by MS onset phenotype, such difference was only present in males with relapsing-onset MS (p = 0.00006). Similarly, worse Expanded Disability Status Scale scores were confirmed only in men with relapsing-onset disease after phenotype adjustment (p = 0.02)., Conclusion: We did not find any statistically significant clinical or demographic difference between sexes when the progressive MS phenotype was specifically considered. However, the differences we found between the clinical phenotypes are in line with the literature and highlight the importance of stratifying the analyses by sex and phenotype when designing MS studies., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Identification of triggers that potentially instigate attacks in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) has remained challenging. We aimed to analyze the seasonality of NMOSD and MS attacks in an Argentinean cohort seeking differences between the two disorders., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a cohort of NMOSD and MS patients followed in specialized centers from Argentina and enrolled in RelevarEM, a nationwide, longitudinal, observational, non-mandatory registry of MS/NMOSD patients. Patients with complete relapse data (date, month and year) at onset and during follow-up were included. Attack counts were analyzed by month using a Poisson regression model with the median monthly attack count used as reference., Results: A total of 551 patients (431 MS and 120 NMOSD), experiencing 236 NMOSD-related attacks and 558 MS-related attacks were enrolled. The mean age at disease onset in NMOSD was 39.5 ± 5.8 vs. 31.2 ± 9.6 years in MS (p < 0.01). Mean follow-up time was 6.1 ± 3.0 vs. 7.4 ± 2.4 years (p < 0.01), respectively. Most of the included patients were female in both groups (79% vs. 60%, p < 0.01). We found a peak of number of attacks in June (NMOSD: 28 attacks (11.8%) vs MS: 33 attacks (5.9%), incidence rate ratio 1.82, 95%CI 1.15-2.12, p = 0.03), but no differences were found across the months in both disorders when evaluated separately. Strikingly, we observed a significant difference in the incidence rate ratio of attacks during the winter season when comparing NMOSD vs. MS (NMOSD: 75 attacks (31.7%) vs MS: 96 attacks (17.2%), incidence rate ratio 1.82, 95%CI 1.21-2.01, p = 0.02) after applying Poisson regression model. Similar results were observed when comparing the seropositive NMOSD (n = 75) subgroup vs. MS., Conclusions: Lack of seasonal variation in MS and NMOSD attacks was observed when evaluated separately. Future epidemiological studies about the effect of different environmental factors on MS and NMOSD attacks should be evaluated prospectively in Latin America population., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-ab) have been described in aquaporin-4-antibodies(AQP4-ab)-negative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients. We aimed to evaluate the percentage of AQP4-ab-negative NMOSD patients who are positive for MOG-ab in a cohort of Argentinean patients included in RelevarEM (Clinical Trials registry number NCT03375177)., Methods: RelevarEM is a longitudinal, strictly observational multiple sclerosis (MS) and NMOSD registry in Argentina. Of 3031 consecutive patients (until March 2020), 165 patients with phenotype of suspected NMOSD, whose relevant data for the purpose of this study were available, were included. Data on demographic, clinical, paraclinical and treatment in AQP4-ab (positive, negative and unknown) and MOG-ab (positive and negative) patients were evaluated., Results: A total of 165 patients (79 AQP4-Ab positive, 67 AQP4-Ab negative and 19 unknown) were included. Of these, 155 patients fulfilled the 2015 NMOSD diagnostic criteria. Of 67 AQP4-Ab-negative patients, 36 (53.7%) were tested for MOG-Ab and 10 of them (27.7%) tested positive. Serum AQP4-ab levels were tested by means of cell-based assay (CBA) in 48 (35.2%), based on tissue-based indirect immunofluorescence assays in 58 (42.6%) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 4 (2.9%). All MOG-ab were tested by CBA. Optic neuritis (90%) was the most frequent symptom at presentation and optic nerve lesions the most frequent finding (80%) in neuroimaging of MOG-ab-associated disease. Of these, six (60%) patients were under immunosuppressant treatments at latest follow-up., Conclusion: We observed that 27.7% (10/36) of the AQP4-ab-negative patients tested for MOG-ab were positive for this antibody, in line with results from other world regions., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic immune-mediated neurological disorder in young adults, more frequently found in women than in men. Therefore, pregnancy-related issues have become an object of concern for MS professionals and patients. The aim of this work was to review the existing data to develop the first Argentine consensus for family planning and pregnancy in MS patients., Methods: A panel of expert neurologists from Argentina engaged in the diagnosis and care of MS patients met both virtually and in person during 2019 to carry out a consensus recommendation for family planning and pregnancy in MS. To achieve consensus, the procedure of the "formal consensus-RAND/UCLA method" was used., Results: Recommendations were established based on published evidence and expert opinion focusing on pre-pregnancy counseling, pregnancy, and postpartum issues., Conclusion: The recommendations of these consensus guidelines are intended to optimize the management and treatment of MS patients during their reproductive age in Argentina., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Nora Fernández Liguori has received consulting fees from Biogen Argentina, Novartis Argentina and Genzyme Argentina, as a lecturer from Merck Argentina, Novartis Argentina, Genzyme Argentina and Biogen Argentina, and collaboration for attendance to national and international congresses from Biogen Argentina, Novartis Argentina, Merck Argentina, Bayer Argentina, Gador and Roche Argentina. Ricardo Alonso has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities with Biogen Argentina, Genzyme Argentina, Merck Argentina, Novartis Argentina and Roche Argentina. María Eugenia Balbuena has received personal compensation for speaking from Roche, professional travel/accommodation stipends from Merck, Novartis and Teva and funding for research from Genzyme and Novartis. Andrés Barboza has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, educational and research grants, consultation fees and travel stipends from Biogen, Sanofi, Merck, Roche, Novartis, Teva, Gador, Raffo, Biosidus and Synthon-Bagó. Santiago Bestoso has received personal compensation for speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities from Merck, Biogen, Novartis, Gador and Genzyme. Marcos Burgos has received personal compensation for speaking from Merck, Novartis, Raffo, Sanofi Genzyme, Biogen, Roche and for research from Novartis and Biogen. Fernando Cáceres has received fees for being a member of advisory boards, for research, being a speaker and for traveling/accommodation for scientific medical meetings of the following companies: Novartis, Teva, Roche, Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme and Merck. Edgar Carnero Contentti has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities with Biogen Argentina, Genzyme Argentina, Merck Argentina, Novartis Argentina, Teva Argentina, Roche Argentina and Bayer Argentina. Adriana Carrá has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities with Bayer; Biogen; Biosidus; Genzyme; Merck; MS Synthon-Bago; Novartis; Roche; Teva, Tuteur. Edgardo Cristiano received consulting fees, funding for advisory boards and educational support from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis and Roche. Norma Deri has received personal compensation for advisory boards for Bayer Argentina, Bayer Latinoamerica, Bayer Global, Merck Serono Argentina, Merck Serono Global, Genzyme Argentina, Genzyme Latinoamerica, Genzyme Global and Sanofi Global; for travel/ accommodation from Schering, Bayer, Serono, Merck Serono, Novartis, Biogen Idec, Teva-Tuteur, Teva and Roche; for research from Bayer Argentina, Biogen Idec Argentina,Genzyme Argentina, Novartis Argentina, Roche Argentina, Teva Argentina and Sanofi Argentina and for educational presentations from Bayer Argentina, Merck Serono Argentina and Genzyme Argentina. Marcela Fiol has received personal compensation for developing educational presentations, serving on a scientific advisory board from Merck-Serono Argentina, Sanofi Genzyme Argentina, TEVA-Tuteur Argentina and has received travel/accommodations stipends from Merck-Serono Argentina, Sanofi Genzyme Argentina, Biogen INC, Bayer Inc, Novartis, TEVA-Tuteur Argentina, ROCHE Argentina. María Inés Gaitán has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, from Roche Argentina, Merck Argentina, Biogen Argentina, Sanofi-Genzyme Argentina, Bayer Inc Argentina and Novartis Argentina, and has received travel/accommodations stipends from Merck Argentina, Biogen Argentina, Roche Argentina, Novartis Argentina, and TEVA Argentina. Orlando Garcea has received personal compensation for consulting and speaking from Bayer, Merck, Biogen, Novartis and Genzyme. Mario Javier Halfon has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities from Biogen Argentina, Merck Argentina, Roche, Gador, Novartis, and Genzyme Argentina. Javier Hryb has received honoraria for the development of educational activities, and travel grants to congresses from Teva, Merck, Biogen, Roche, Tuteur, Synthon Bago and Novartis. Miguel Jacobo has received honoraria for the development of educational activities, research and travel grants to congresses from Biogen, Roche, Merck, Genzyme Novartis, Teva, Bayer, Raffo and Gador. Eduardo Knorre has received personal compensation for professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities from Bagó, Tuteur and Roche. Pablo López has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on scientific advisory boards, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities with Biogen, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Teva, Roche and Bayer. Jimena Miguez has received personal compensation for professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities from Merck, Novartis, Genzyme, Roche and for speaking from Merck, Novartis and Roche. Pedro Nofal has received honoraria for the development of educational activities, research and travel grants to congress from Novartis, Biogen, Merck Serono, Raffo, Genzyme, Gador and Bayer Schering. Raúl Piedrabuena has received personal compensation for the development of educational activities, serving on a scientific advisory board and research from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Genzyme, Roche and Teva. Cecilia Pita has received honoraria for the development of educational activities, research and travel grants to congress from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis and Roche. Juan Ignacio Rojas has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, educational and research grants, consultation fees and travel stipends from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis. Berenice Silva has received economic retribution for the development of educational, scientific activities and travel grants to congresses from Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Genzyme, TEVA, Bayer, Tuteur and Roche. Vladimiro Sinay has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities with Bayer, Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Biosidus, Gador, Tuteur and Raffo/ Asofarma. Adriana Tarulla reports personal fees for speaking and support for travel to meetings from Bayer,Biogen Idec,Biosidus,Gador,Ivax-Teva,Merck Serono and Roche, out-side the submitted work. Darío Tavolini has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities Bayer, Biogen, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche and Teva. Santiago Tizio has received professional travel accommodation stipends from Merck-Serono, Synthon Bago, Biogen-Idec, TEVA, Genzyme, Novartis and Roche; reimbursement for developing educational presentations from Biogen-Idec and Novartis and honoraria for advisory services from Merck-Serono, and Novartis. Verónica Tkachuk: has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities from Biogen, Roche, Merck, TEVA, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, Bayer y Raffo. Carlos Vrech has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities from Merck, Novartis, Biogen, Synthon Bago, Gador and Genzyme. Maria Célica Ysrraelit has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, professional travel/accommodation stipends or other activities from Merck, Biogen, Novartis, Roche and Bayer Argentina. Liliana Patrucco has received speaker honoraria from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis and Roche. Has received travel grants and attended courses and conferences on behalf of Merck-Serono, Genzyme and Roche. All the other authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Despite that different registries already exist in various countries in Europe and North America, no ongoing nationwide registry exists in Latin America (LATAM), a region where the disease behaves differently than in other regions. The objective of this document is to describe the methodology behind RelevarEM, the first nationwide MS registry in Argentina and LATAM. METHODS: In this article, we described the creation, implementation and data management of the nationwide MS registry in Argentina. The registry contains information on the structure, ethical aspects, implementation and variables of the registry (Clinical Trials registry number NCT NCT03375177). CONCLUSION: RelevarEM is the first MS nationwide registry in Argentina, as well as in LATAM, with the objective of providing reliable real-world data of MS in the country., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: The present study was carried out to assess if there is an anticipation of age at onset in younger generations of familial multiple sclerosis (FMS) vs. sporadic MS (SMS) in Argentina., Methods: multicenter study that included patients from 14 MS Centers of Argentina. Patients were considered as FMS if they had in their family at least one relative of first or second degree diagnosed with MS; otherwise, patients were considered to have SMS. We compared the age at onset between familial and sporadic cases as well as the age at onset between relatives from different generations in FMS vs. SMS., Results: 1333 patients were included, 97 of them were FMS (7.3%). A lower age at onset in the younger generations of FMS cases was found compared with older generations of FMS as well as. SMS cases (24.1±3.7 years vs. 30.3±5.7 years, and 32.4±9.4 respectively; p<0.001). No differences were observed between older generations of FMS vs. SMS cases (p=0.12)., Conclusion: we observed an anticipation of age at onset of MS in younger generations of patients with FMS vs. older generations of FMS and SMS., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)