1. A prospective, open-label treatment trial to compare the effect of IFNbeta-1a (Avonex), IFNbeta-1b (Betaseron), and glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) on the relapse rate in relapsing--remitting multiple sclerosis: results after 18 months of therapy.
- Author
-
Khan OA, Tselis AC, Kamholz JA, Garbern JY, Lewis RA, and Lisak RP
- Subjects
- Adult, Disability Evaluation, Female, Glatiramer Acetate, Humans, Interferon beta-1a, Interferon beta-1b, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting physiopathology, Prospective Studies, Secondary Prevention, Time Factors, Adjuvants, Immunologic therapeutic use, Immunosuppressive Agents therapeutic use, Interferon-beta therapeutic use, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting drug therapy, Peptides therapeutic use
- Abstract
We previously reported results of a 12 month prospective, non-randomized, open-label treatment trial of immunomodulatory therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). We now report the results after 18 months of follow-up. Our primary objective was to compare the effect of IFNbeta-1a (Avonex), IFNbeta-1b (Betaseron), and Glatiramer Acetate (GA, Copaxone) to no treatment on the relapse rate in patients with RRMS. One hundred and fifty-six consecutive patients with clinically definite RRMS with a Kurtzke scale (EDSS) score of 4 or less were followed for 18 months. Prior 2-year relapse history and available chart information was carefully reviewed at the time of enrollment Thirty-three of 156 elected no treatment at enrollment; 40 elected IFNbeta-1a, 41 IFNbeta-1b, and 42 chose GA. There were no statistically significant differences among the four groups at enrollment. After 18 months of treatment 122 patients remained in their original treatment group. Compared to the untreated group (1.02), mean annualized number of relapses was significantly reduced only in the GA (0.49, P>0.0001) and IFNbeta-1b groups (0.55, P=0.001) in contrast to the IFNbeta-1a treated patients (0.81, P=0.106) who did not show a significant reduction. Despite limitations of the study design, the results provide helpful clinical information regarding the relative efficacy of each therapy in mildly affected treatment naive RRMS patients.
- Published
- 2001
- Full Text
- View/download PDF