1. Patient and family views on research priorities and design of clinical trials and research studies in pediatric multiple sclerosis.
- Author
-
O'Donnell E, Schuette A, Waltz M, Aaen G, Benson L, Gorman M, Lotze T, Mar S, Ness J, Rodriguez M, Tillema JM, Schreiner T, Wheeler Y, Casper TC, and Chitnis T
- Subjects
- Humans, Adolescent, Male, Female, Adult, Young Adult, Child, Registries, Parents psychology, Biomedical Research, Multiple Sclerosis therapy, Multiple Sclerosis drug therapy, Clinical Trials as Topic, Research Design
- Abstract
Background and Objectives: This survey study aimed to (1) identify patient/family research priorities in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS), and (2) delineate optimized methods for research study/clinical trials design, engagement, and implementation., Methods: Participants were as follows: (1) parents of a child (<18 years) with POMS enrolled in a national registry, (2) adolescents (13-17 years) with POMS in the registry, and (3) adults (18-40 years) with POMS receiving care at a registry affiliated clinic. Of 293 eligible participants, 192 completed surveys., Results: Experiences with health care and medications were generally positive but there remain areas of priority improvement. Incentives to participate in clinical trials included medications previously tested and in pill form, bloodwork/study visits required ⩾ every 3 months, cognitive testing ⩽1 hour, compensation for travel and time, ability to continue current multiple sclerosis (MS) medication, option to take study medication if on placebo, and individualized study feedback. Priorities for clinical research were (1) psychosocial impact, (2) cognitive/academic impact, (3) environmental risk, and (4) nutrition., Conclusions: Results highlighted the importance of a holistic approach to study design and a focus on the impact of disease on daily life to best engage patients and families in POMS clinical trials and research., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: T.C. has received compensation for consulting from Banner Life Sciences*, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Genentech, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Octave Bioscience, Sandoz, Siemens, TG Therapeutics*, UCB Biopharma, and Vida Ventures*. He has received compensation for speaking engagements from Prime Education, LLC*. He has received research support from the National Institutes of Health, National MS Society, US Department of Defense, Sumaira Foundation, Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, EMD Serono, I-Mab Biopharma, Mallinckrodt ARD, Massachusetts Life Sciences Center, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Octave Bioscience, Sanofi Genzyme, Tiziana Life Sciences, and Wesley Clover International. All activities and funding have occurred within the past 24 months (*relationship has since ended), and disclosures do not conflict with the work being presented.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF