1. Selectivity of conventional electrodes for recording motor evoked potentials: An investigation with high‐density surface electromyography
- Author
-
Alessio Gallina, Jason L. Neva, S. Jayne Garland, Sue Peters, and Lara A. Boyd
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Physiology ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Electromyography ,Wrist ,Extensor carpi radialis muscle ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience ,0302 clinical medicine ,Forearm ,Physiology (medical) ,medicine ,Humans ,Muscle, Skeletal ,Electrodes ,Amplitude distribution ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,High density surface electromyography ,030229 sport sciences ,Anatomy ,Evoked Potentials, Motor ,Hand ,musculoskeletal system ,Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ,Healthy Volunteers ,body regions ,Transcranial magnetic stimulation ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Electrode ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Muscle Contraction ,Biomedical engineering - Abstract
Introduction: The objective of this study was to determine whether motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited with transcranial magnetic stimulation and measured with conventional bipolar electromyography (EMG) are influenced by crosstalk from non-target muscles. Methods: MEPs were recorded in healthy participants using conventional EMG electrodes placed over the extensor carpi radialis muscle (ECR) and high-density surface EMG (HDsEMG). Fifty MEPs at 120% resting and active motor threshold were recorded. To determine the contribution of ECR to the MEPs, the amplitude distribution across HDsEMG channels was correlated with EMG activity recorded during a wrist extension task. Results: While the conventional EMG identified MEPs from ECR in >90% of the stimulations, HDsEMG revealed that spatial amplitude distribution representative of ECR activation was observed less frequently at rest than while holding a contraction (P
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF