1. Why is exercise prescribed for people with chronic low back pain? A review of the mechanisms of benefit proposed by clinical trialists
- Author
-
Matthew D. Jones, Rodrigo R N Rizzo, Harry Jeong, Annika Wun, James H. McAuley, Matthew K Bagg, Aidan G Cashin, and Paul Kollias
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Mechanism (biology) ,business.industry ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,humanities ,Chronic low back pain ,Physiotherapy Evidence Database ,Clinical trial ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Physical therapy ,medicine ,Humans ,Tissue healing ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Thematic analysis ,business ,Exercise ,Low Back Pain ,human activities ,Psychosocial ,Physical Therapy Modalities ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Background Exercise is recommended for the management of chronic low back pain (CLBP). Trialists have proposed numerous mechanisms to explain why exercise improves pain and function in people with CLBP, but these are yet to be synthesised. Objective To synthesise the proposed mechanisms of benefit for exercise in people with CLBP. Design Review. Methods The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) was searched from inception to July 2019. Randomised controlled trials of adults with CLBP, indexed in PEDro as ‘fitness training’, were included. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data from each study. Data were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively using thematic analysis. Results 186 studies were identified and 110 were included in the analysis. Thirty-six studies (33%) did not provide a mechanism of benefit for exercise in people with CLBP. Of the remaining studies, most provided more than one mechanism, from which 33 unique mechanisms were identified. These were grouped into five themes which, from most to least common, were: neuromuscular (n = 105 (44%)); psychosocial (n = 87 (36%)); neurophysiological (n = 22 (9%)); cardiometabolic (n = 15 (6%)); and tissue healing (n = 12 (5%)). The effects of these proposed mechanisms on outcomes for people with CLBP were seldom examined. Conclusions This review identified a variety of mechanisms proposed in clinical trials to explain why ‘fitness training’ works for people with CLBP, but these mechanisms were seldom tested. Randomised controlled trials investigating the mediating effects of these mechanisms may be warranted to better understand why exercise works for CLBP.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF