The study discusses whether prolongational organization occurs in Schoenberg's op. 19/2. The four conditions of prolongation postulated by Joseph Straus are adopted as the basis of the discussion, but the method of identifying harmonies with pitch-class sets is rejected. This is justified partly on perceptual grounds. Using a conception of intervals and harmonies with restricted octave equivalence, an analysis is presented showing a structure in which the four conditions are fulfilled to a significant degree. Additional examples showing comparable organization in Schoenberg's op. 11 are presented. which is a harmonic interval of central importance. Technically speaking, the "double double neighbor" figure in m. 7, shown in Example 21d, includes rointerval lls, G#4-A3 and C4-D63, as voice-leading intervals. However, the situation is clarified by the (more salient) Is, C#5-C4 and A3-A,3, and, in addition, by the contextual justification provided by the connection to the original double neighbor in the first phrase (Example 21a). Perceptual justification for using "compound" versions of ro-intervals 1 and 2 as voice-leading intervals (cf. also Example 14c) might, perhaps, be based on the proximity between the nth harmonics of the upper tone and the 2nth of the lower (cf. Bregman's tentative explanation of a minor ninth trill in Stravinsky, Auditory Scene Analysis, 477). This content downloaded from 157.55.39.92 on Tue, 21 Jun 2016 05:45:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms