Search

Any normal person would have found in Judge Thomas P. Jackson's 'finding of fact' in the Microsoft case an invigorating tale of battle, maneuver, and compromise in the high-tech marketplace. [...]

The Return of Depression Economics, by Paul Krugman (Norton, 176 pp., $23.95) The world economy has been looking up since this book went to press. Asia shows signs of bouncing [...]

Turbo-Capitalism: Winners and Losers in the Global Economy, by Edward Luttwak (HarperCollins, 290 pp., $26) The Crisis of Global Capitalism: Open Society Endangered, by George Soros (Public Affairs, 245 pp., [...]

This article discusses various editorial arguments which appeared in the "National Review" regarding the U.S. government's antitrust trial against Microsoft Corp. The periodical's editorial asserted that Microsoft does not really have a monopoly of personal-computer operating systems. The focus of the case was the attack by Microsoft on Netscape's browser by incorporating its own browser into its operating system. It suggests that Holman W. Jenkins Jr. was misinformed in his analysis of the Microsoft case. Professor Richard Epstein addressed the merits of the Microsoft controversy.