Search

Chronic kidney disease is a common complication after liver transplantation. However, few reports regarding kidney histology exist for this setting.Inulin clearance was measured and a kidney biopsy was performed in 99 patients at 60 ± 48 months after liver transplantation. Kidney biopsies were scored according to the Banff classification, and interstitial fibrosis was measured by a computerized quantitative method.There was a steep decrease in kidney function within the first 6 months following transplantation, but this lessened thereafter. At kidney biopsy, inulin clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation) were highly correlated (r(2) = 0.47, P0.0001). A decrease in eGFR at 6 months post-transplant was the sole predictive factor for inulin clearance of60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 5 years post-transplant. Few patients had a specific pattern of kidney histopathology and all patients had complex primary lesions. Lowered eGFR at 6 months post-transplant was a predictive factor for50% sclerotic glomeruli on the kidney biopsy. The duration of tacrolimus therapy, as compared to cyclosporine A, was a protective factor for20% interstitial fibrosis on the kidney biopsy.In the setting of liver transplantation, this is the largest kidney-histology study to confirm that histological kidney lesions are complex, multiple and interrelated. Kidney function at 6 months post-transplant can predict long-term kidney function and histology.

Background. New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM)—a common complication of kidney transplantation—is associated with increases in graft loss, morbidity and mortality. Methods. This is a purely observational study of 527 patients taking a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), based on data collected at a single routine visit 6–24 months after kidney transplantation. Diabetes was defined according to ADA/WHO guidelines. Results. The mean age of the patients was 47.2 years and 61.1% were men; 49.5% were receiving cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME) and 50.5% tacrolimus (Tac). NODM developed in 7.0% after a median interval of 1.6 months. In CsA-ME-treated patients, the unadjusted cumulative risks of NODM were 5.5% and 8.4% at 1- and 2-year post-transplantation, while in Tac-treated patients, the risks were respectively 17.4% and 21%. Four independent risk factors (RFs) were identified by multivariate analysis: maximum lifetime body mass index >25 [odds ratio (OR) ¼ 5.1], pre-transplantation impaired fasting glucose (OR ¼ 4.7), hepatitis C status (OR ¼ 4.7) and Tac vs CsA-ME treatment (OR ¼ 3.0). Conclusions. NODM is associated with certain RFs present prior to kidney transplantation, and with treatment with Tac as opposed to CsA-ME.

Background. Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are one of the main adverse events in patients treated by mycophenolic acid (MPA). The aim of our prospective questionnaire-based study was to assess GI side-effects in de novo renal-transplant patients receiving either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). Methods. Between January 2002 and April 2003, all patients receiving MPA with a functioning allograft at 1 month post-transplantation were enrolled in this study (n ¼ 130). Ninety-three of them received MMF (group I), and 37 patients received EC-MPS (group II). Each month, every patient completed a questionnaire regarding GI disorders. Results. During the first year post-transplantation, GI disorders occurred in 31 patients from the MMF group (33.3%) and 12 patients from the EC-MPS group (32.4%) (not significant). The incidence of upper GI disorders was also similar in both groups. Diarrhoea was observed in 18 patients (19.3%) from group I, and in five patients from group II (13.5%) (not significant). Its frequency and severity were similar in both groups. Weight loss was observed in three patients receiving MMF. Diarrhoea resolved spontaneously in 10 patients from group I and in all patients from group II. For the other eight patients in group I, the diarrhoea required MMF discontinuation in three patients and dose reduction in five patients. Conclusions. In conclusion, in this questionnaire-based evaluation, the incidence of GI disorders was similar in patients receiving either MMF or EC-MPS during the first year post-transplantation.

BACKGROUND Treatment with trisodium citrate provides an effective means of regional anticoagulation during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). We evaluated the efficacy, safety and cost of a regional citrate anticoagulation protocol using commercial solutions in 17 critically ill patients treated with continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). We performed a total of 22 sessions. METHODS We delivered an A.C.D-A(541(R)) solution containing 112.9 mmol/l disodium citrate (3.22%) at a median rate of 260 (190-280) ml/h via the pre-filter port of a COBE PRISMA with an AN-69 dialyser, while adjusting the rate to maintain post-filtered ionized calcium (iCa(2+)) between 0.25 and 0.4 mmol/l. Plasma iCa(2+) was maintained at >1.1 mmol/l by infusion of calcium chloride at a median rate of 1.70 (1.36-2.27) mmol/h. The dialysate was easily modified according to the acid-base status of each patient. Both replacement and dialysate solutions were delivered at 1200 ml/h. Each session was scheduled for 48 h and biological parameters were assessed every 6 h. RESULTS The mean dialyser survival was 39 +/- 11 h (median 41.5 h; range 13-48 h). We observed dialyser clotting in four cases (18%). There were no bleeding events or modifications of coagulation parameters. The citrate solution, replacement solution and dialysate were obtained as commercial products. Both the replacement and dialysate solutions contained calcium. The extra cost of this technique was 25 euro;/day as compared to anticoagulation with heparin. CONCLUSIONS We designed an efficient method of regional citrate anticoagulation for CVVHDF by using commercial solutions. The monitoring of patients was as intensive as during heparin anticoagulation for CRRT. Because of the higher cost of this method, it should be proposed only for patients with high bleeding risk.