Search

Introduction: Rifampicin is one of the most effective components of anti‐tuberculous therapy (ATT). Since rifampicin is a hepatic enzyme (CYP3A4) inducer, in a post‐renal transplant recipient, the dose of calcineurin inhibitors needs to be up‐regulated and frequently monitored. In resource‐limited (low‐ and lower‐middle‐income countries) setting this is not always feasible. Therefore, we evaluated a non‐rifampicin‐based ATT using levofloxacin in kidney transplant recipients. Methods: We retrospectively studied the medical records of renal transplant recipients diagnosed with tuberculosis in our institute between 2014 and 2017. After a brief discussion with patients regarding the nature and course of ATT, those who opted for a non‐rifampicin based therapy due to financial constraints were included in the study and followed for a minimum of 6 months period after the completion of ATT. Results: Out of the 550 renal transplant recipients, 67 (12.2%) developed tuberculosis after a median period of 24 (1‐228) months following transplantation, of them, 64 patients opted for non‐rifampicin‐based ATT. The mean age was 37.6 years. Only 25% were given anti‐thymocyte globulin based induction, while the majority (56; 87.5%) of them were on tacrolimus‐based triple‐drug maintenance therapy. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis was noted in 33% of cases, while 12 (18.7%) had disseminated disease. The median duration of treatment was 12 months and the cure rate of 93.7% (n = 60) was achieved at the end of therapy. Conclusion: Levofloxacin based ATT appears to be a safe and effective alternative of rifampicin in kidney transplant recipients who cannot afford heightened tacrolimus dosage. SUMMARY AT A GLANCE: In this single‐centre study, the authors report their experience using levofloxacin instead of rifampicin for the treatment of tuberculosis after kidney transplantation. Therapy with levofloxacin appeared safe and effective, and may provide a more cost‐effective treatment for post‐transplant tuberculosis in financially constrained clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Collapsing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (cFSGS) is an aggressive glomerular disease presenting as a nephrotic syndrome that has lower rates of remission with conventional immunosuppressive therapy and rapidly progresses to end‐stage‐renal‐disease (ESRD). We report eight cases of HIV‐negative cFSGS treated with rituximab. Methods: The current report is a retrospective case series of cFSGS treated with rituximab from January 2011 to March 2020, at varying phases of the disease. Results: Eight out of the 70 cFSGS patients received rituximab. The median age of patients was 30 years (IQR 24.25‐37.5); five patients were males. The median serum creatinine, mean serum albumin and median 24 hours urinary protein at presentation was 0.9 (IQR 0.66‐1.27) mg/dL, 2.95 ± 1.15 g/dL, 4.87 (IQR 1.64‐5.75) g/day, respectively. Two patients were steroid‐resistant, one steroid and tacrolimus dependent, one steroid and cyclosporine dependent, two steroids and tacrolimus resistant, one steroid, tacrolimus, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil resistant and one steroid‐resistant and tacrolimus dependent before rituximab therapy. Rituximab was given either as targeted therapy (after an initial dose of 375 mg/m2; patients having CD‐19 levels >5/μL or >1% at 1 month received additional low‐dose [100 mg] of rituximab), or weekly regimen. Five patients received CD‐19 targeted rituximab; three received weekly doses of 375 mg/m2, cumulative doses being 820 ± 228.03 mg, and 1800 ± 721.11 mg, respectively. At the end of median follow‐up of 15 months, five (62.5%) patients were in remission (three partial, two complete remissions), two (25%) were resistant to therapy; one (12.5%) progressed to ESRD. Conclusion: Rituximab is reasonably safe and achieves/maintains remission in 60% of cFSGS cases. SUMMARY AT A GLANCE: This is a retrospective study reporting the effects of Rituximab on 8 patients with the collapsing form of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Whilst retrospective in nature, the study suggested that rituximab might be a promising form of treatment for this condition, which is traditionally resistant to immunosuppression therapy, resulting in a remission rate of 60% with a reasonable safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Alport syndrome (AS) is an inherited disorder of basement membranes caused by mutations affecting specific proteins of the type IV collagen family, presenting with nephropathy and extrarenal manifestations such as sensorineural deafness and ocular anomalies. Ten percentage to 15% of the patients with AS have autosomal recessive (ARAS) due to mutation in either COL4A3 or COL4A4 gene. We report a novel mutation in the COL4A3 gene in an Indian family with ARAS. The above‐mentioned genetic anomaly was a missense variation in exon 26 of the COL4A3 gene (chr2:228137797G>A; c.1891G>A) that resulted in the amino acid substitution of Arginine for Glycine at codon 631 (p.Gly631Arg) that was present in the heterozygous state in the asymptomatic parents and homozygous state in the male offspring who presented with early‐onset end‐stage renal disease, lenticonus and hearing loss. The patient (male offspring) underwent successful renal transplantation with his mother as a donor. SUMMARY AT A GLANCE: A novel mutation in the COL4A3 gene in an Indian family with autosomal recessive Alport syndrome is described. The index case underwent a successful renal transplantation with his mother (who possessed the associated missense mutation) as the donor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The literature on membranous nephropathy (MN) with monoclonal deposits on immunofluorescence (IF) and their outcome is very scarce. We report our experience of managing five patients with this clinical entity. The mean age of the patients was 33.2 ± 6.55 years. The mean proteinuria, serum albumin and serum creatinine was 5.73 ± 2.17 g/day, 2.86 ± 0.51 g/dL and 1.34 ± 1.19 mg/dL, respectively. None of the patients had a lymphoproliferative disorder. Only one patient had an elevated free light chain ratio. Four (80%) patients were M‐type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) negative (tissue and serum), and one (20%) was PLA2R related. Three (60%) cases had monoclonal IgG3/k, one IgG3/λ, whereas one patient with PLA2R positivity had an IgG3/IgG4k subtype. Two (67%) patients treated with cyclical cyclophosphamide and steroids (cCYC/GC) achieved complete remission and one patient (33%) with elevated baseline creatinine had a reduction in serum creatinine with persistent proteinuria at the end of the 12th month of follow‐up. One patient with PLA2R positive MN was treated with Rituximab and is in complete remission. The patient with an elevated free light chain at baseline was treated with Bortezomib/Thalidomide/Dexamethasone, had complete remission at 12 months, however, had a progressive rise in creatinine over the next 40 months of follow‐up. The current series, though limited by numbers, documents the efficacy of conventional therapies in non‐malignant associated MN with monoclonal deposits on IF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) accounts for only 1-2% of nephrotic syndrome in children. Antibodies to m-type phospholipase A2 receptor (aPLA2R) is seen in 70% of adult PMN cases. The present study was undertaken to study m-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) status and clinical behavior in adolescent PMN cases. Methods The present prospective observational study included adolescent (10-19 years) onset biopsy proved PMN. Patients were followed on a monthly basis with urine protein, serum albumin and creatinine. Serum aPLA2R was done at baseline and at 6 and 12 months of starting treatment. Patients were treated as per unit's protocol. Results During the study period a total of 18 patients were enrolled. The mean age of the cases was 16.27 ± 2.39 (11-19) years. Seventeen (94.44%) patients presented with nephrotic syndrome. The mean proteinuria and serum albumin was 4.52 ± 1.93 (2.43-9.20) g/day and 2.1 ± 0.6 (1.1-3.4) g/dL respectively. PMN was PLA2R related in 83%. aPLA2R and enhanced staining for PLA2R in glomeruli was seen in 14 (77.78%) and 13 (72.22%), respectively. Clinical remission at the end of 6 and 12 months of therapy was seen in 11 (61.11%) and 9 (50%) subjects respectively. There was a significant association of aPLA2R to clinical remission/ resistance. Conclusion Primary membranous nephropathy in adolescent population is aPLA2R related in over three-quarters of the cases and the response to therapy is seen in only half of them. aPLA2R monitoring is clinically relevant and should be incorporated in the management of adolescent onset PMN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim There have been very few studies comparing cyclophosphamide ( CTX) and calcineurin inhibitor based regimens in the management of non-immunosuppressive symptomatic therapy ( NIST) resistant idiopathic membranous nephropathy ( IMN). The present study was aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ( TAC)/steroids with cyclical CTX/steroids ( Modified Ponticelli regimen ( MPR)) in patients with IMN. Methods Idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients ( n = 70) with persistent nephrotic syndrome after at least 6 months of antiproteinuric therapy or with complications of nephrotic syndrome were equally randomized to receive TAC with oral prednisolone ( TAC*) or MPR. Antibodies against m-type phospholipase A2 receptor ( PLA2R Ab) were tested for at baseline and, at 6 and 12 months after the start of therapy. The primary end point was achievement of remission and secondary objectives were adverse effects and estimated glomerular filtration rate in both the study groups. Results Intention-to-treat analysis showed that remissions at the end of 6 (74% with TAC* vs. 60% with MPR; P = 0.30) and 12 months (71% with TAC* vs. 77% with MPR; P = 0.78) were comparable. PLA2R Ab titres at 6/12 months correlated with urine protein (r 0.54/0.58) and serum albumin (r −0.49/−0.53) at the end of therapy. Patients on CTX had a significantly higher risk of amenorrhea and while those on TAC had a greater risk of reversible nephrotoxicity. Conclusion In NIST refractory IMN, both TAC* and MPR are comparable, but with different adverse effect profile. PLA2R Ab has a very good association with proteinuria, and should be regularly monitored on clinical follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Whether or not completing the hepatitis B vaccination in patients who have undergone kidney transplantation in the middle of incomplete vaccination schedule leads to development of protective antibody titres is not known. This study was designed to determine whether the strategy of completing hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination after transplantation is efficacious. Sixty-four end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients were screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) and HBV DNA. HBsAg negative patients received four doses of 40 µg recombinant HBV vaccine. Schedule was continued in after transplantation period if it was incomplete before transplant. Anti-Hbs titres were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Past HBV infection was noted in 12 patients: 10 by serology plus viraemia and two by viraemia alone. Of the 46 patients without current or past HBV infection who had received at least two doses of the vaccine before transplant, 17 each had received two and three doses and 12 had completed the schedule. Seventeen (37%) exhibited protective titres. Patients who had completed vaccination were more likely to have protective titres than those incompletely vaccinated ( P = 0.02). Five patients responded to post-transplant vaccination. Partially vaccinated patients do not mount an adequate antibody response despite continued vaccination in the post-transplant period, whereas complete vaccination provides protection in 60%. The present study data highlights the need of administration of a full schedule of HBV vaccination before kidney transplantation. Nucleic acid-based tests can identify occult HBV infection. Patients partially vaccinated against HBV do not mount an adequate antibody response despite continued vaccination in the post-transplant period. The data presented here highlights the need for administration of a full schedule of vaccination before kidney transplantation for maximal protection against HBV infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]