Search

Background Despite the widespread use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) to treat anaemia, the risk of adverse outcomes associated with the use of different types of ESAs in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) is poorly investigated. Methods From a pooled cohort of four observational studies, we selected CKD patients receiving short-acting (epoetin α/β; n  = 299) or long-acting ESAs (darbepoetin and methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin β; n  = 403). The primary composite endpoint was end-stage kidney disease (ESKD; dialysis or transplantation) or all-cause death. Multivariable Cox models were used to estimate the relative risk of the primary endpoint between short- and long-acting ESA users. Results During follow-up [median 3.6 years (interquartile range 2.1–6.3)], the primary endpoint was registered in 401 patients [166 (72%) in the short-acting ESA group and 235 (58%) in the long-acting ESA group]. In the highest tertile of short-acting ESA dose, the adjusted risk of primary endpoint was 2-fold higher {hazard ratio [HR] 2.07 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37–3.12]} than in the lowest tertile, whereas it did not change across tertiles of dose for long-acting ESA patients. Furthermore, the comparison of ESA type in each tertile of ESA dose disclosed a significant difference only in the highest tertile, where the risk of the primary endpoint was significantly higher in patients receiving short-acting ESAs [HR 1.56 (95% CI 1.09–2.24); P = 0.016]. Results were confirmed when ESA dose was analysed as continuous variable with a significant difference in the primary endpoint between short- and long-acting ESAs for doses >105 IU/kg/week. Conclusions Among non-dialysis CKD patients, the use of a short-acting ESA may be associated with an increased risk of ESKD or death versus long-acting ESAs when higher ESA doses are prescribed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (MESas) with intravenous iron supplementation are the main treatment for anaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Although observational studies suggest better outcomes for patients who achieve higher haemoglobin (Hb) levels, randomized controlled trials comparing higher and lower Hb targets have led to safety concerns over higher targets and to changes in treatment guidelines. Methods: Quarterly data from 2005 to 2013 were obtained on 28 936 haemodialysis patients from the UK Renal Registry. We examined trends in ESA use and average dose, Hb and ferritin values over time and Hb according to the UK Renal Association guideline range. Results: The average ESA dose declined over time, with sharper decreases of epoetin seen towards the end of 2006 and from 2009. Average Hb for patients on MESas was 114.1 g/L [95% confidence interval (CI) 113.7, 114.6] in the first quarter of 2005, which decreased to 109.6 g/L (95% CI 109.3, 109.9) by the end of 2013. Average serum ferritin was 353 mg/L (95% CI 345, 360) at the start of 2005, increasing to 386 mg/L (95% CI 380, 392) in the final quarter of 2013. The percentage of patients with Hb in the range of 100-120 g/L increased from 46.1 at the start of 2005 to 57.6 at the end of 2013. Conclusions: Anaemia management patterns for haemodialysis patients changed in the UK between 2005 and 2013. These patterns most likely reflect clinician response to emerging trial evidence and practice guidelines. Registries play an important role in continued observation of anaemia management and will monitor further changes as new evidence on optimal care emerges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. It is unknown whether early intervention with low-dose erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in nonanaemic patients delays progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods. In a single-blind, 24-month trial, adults with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 30-59mL/min/1.73m2 and either Type 2 diabetes mellitus or previous kidney transplantation were randomized to low-dose continuous erythropoiesis receptor activator (CERA; monthly dose 30-75 mg; n=115) or placebo (n=120). The primary endpoint was the annual change in eGFR (abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula). Results. Mean (standard deviation) eGFR was 40.7 (9.8) mL/ min/1.73m2 versus 39.8 (9.2) mL/min/1.73m 2 at baseline for CERA and placebo, respectively, and 39.0 (11.6) g/dL versus 39.7 (10.6) g/dL at the final visit. The median (interquartile range) annual reduction in eGFR was 0.5 (2.2, 3.8) mL/min/ 1.73m2 with CERA versus 0.4 (2.0, 3.2) mL/min/1.73m2 with placebo (P=0.657). No significant difference in the annual change in eGFR was observed between treatment groups in the subpopulations with Type 2 diabetes or kidney transplant. Adverse events with a suspected relation to study drug occurred in 22.0% and 16.2% of patients randomized to CERA or placebo, respectively, and adverse events led to study drug discontinuation in 11.0% and 8.5% of patients. Conclusions. Patients with moderate CKD and Type 2 diabetes or previous kidney transplantation showed stable renal function that was unaffected by administration of low-dose ESA. In addition, there was no clinically meaningful effect of 2-year lowdose ESA treatment on albuminuria, an important surrogate marker of kidney injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Knowledge on anaemia management in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD) patients regularly followed in renal clinics is scarce although being essential to identifying areas of therapeutic improvement. Methods We prospectively evaluated anaemia management in two visits, performed 6 months apart, in 755 prevalent ND-CKD stage 3b-5 patients followed in 19 nephrology clinics from ≥6 months. Anaemia was defined as severe (Hb <11 g/dL) or mild (Hb: 11–13.5 in males and 11–12 g/dL in females); iron deficiency (ID) was defined as transferrin saturation (TSAT) <20% and/or ferritin <100 ng/mL. Primary endpoint was the change of anaemia and ID prevalence between baseline and 6-month visit. Secondary endpoint was the prevalence of clinical inertia to either ESA or iron supplementation, that is, the lack of ESA or iron prescription despite Hb <11 g/dL or ID. Results Age was 69 ± 13 years and GFR 27.5 ± 10.0 mL/min/1.73 m2; male gender, diabetes and prior cardiovascular disease were 57.2, 30.1 and 30.1%, respectively. Prevalence of severe and mild anaemia was 18.0 and 44.0% at baseline and remained unchanged at Month 6 (19.3 and 43.2%). ID was prevalent at both visits (60.1 and 60.9%). Clinical inertia to ESA was similar at baseline and at Month 6 (39.6 and 34.2%, respectively, P = 0.487) and it was less frequent than clinical inertia to iron therapy (75.7 and 72.0%, respectively). Conclusions This study shows that anaemia prevalence is unexpectedly high in the setting of tertiary nephrology care. This was due to a persistent clinical inertia in the anaemia management, remarkable for iron supplementation and less critical, but still significant, for ESA treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The antibody characteristics in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-treated patients who develop antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia (PRCA; amPRCA) can be described as high-affinity, neutralizing anti-ESA antibodies with a mixed immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclass. The characteristics of an early-onset anti-ESA antibody response are not well documented, especially in the months prior to the development of amPRCA. Therefore, a detailed characterization of anti-ESA antibodies was performed in patients in both clinical studies and in a post-market setting. Both baseline and post-dose samples were tested and antibody-positive samples were characterized. Antibody characteristics such as concentration, isotype and specificity were evaluated in subjects with non-neutralizing anti-ESA antibodies and subjects that developed neutralizing anti-ESA antibodies associated with amPRCA. Methods Serum samples were analyzed for the presence of anti-ESA antibodies, using a validated surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based immunoassay or SPRIA. Results Among the clinical studies, pre-existing non-neutralizing anti-ESA antibodies were found in 6% of the subjects from clinical studies in nephrology, oncology and congestive heart failure (CHF). After ESA treatment, 2.3% of the subjects developed binding, non-neutralizing antibodies with 0.1% confirmed as having an IgG isotype and were specific to the ESA protein. IgM antibodies were detected at baseline and post-ESA treatment and reported to be specific to the glycosylation of the ESA. No clinical study subjects progressed to amPRCA. In contrast, anti-ESA antibody-positive subjects from the post-market setting with a confirmed IgG subclass were specific to the ESA protein. Subjects that had progressed to amPRCA were noted to have high antibody concentrations with neutralizing activity and a diverse IgG subtype. Conclusions A low prevalence of non-neutralizing anti-ESA IgM specific to glycosylation on the ESA and IgG1 antibodies specific to the ESA protein was detected across all clinical patient populations. Patients with amPRCA were noted to have high IgG antibody concentrations, neutralizing antibodies and the presence of anti-ESA IgG4 antibodies. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background. One of the cardinal symptoms of anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is fatigue. Recently, results from Trial to Reduce Cardiovascular Events with Aranesp Therapy (TREAT) raised questions about the role of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in improving fatigue and the appropriate hemoglobin (Hb) target in anemic patients with CKD. These discussions should be considered with all available evidence to determine the level of benefits and risks associated with ESA therapy on fatigue among both early-stage CKD patients and end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis. Methods. The study was a systematic review of the literature on fatigue in adults on maintenance dialysis therapy. The requirement for inclusion in the review was the measurement of fatigue before and after ESA treatment. Outcomes that were assessed were fatigue as measured by the Kidney Disease Questionnaire, the 36-item Short-Form general health survey, the Nottingham Health Profile, the Profile of Mood States or the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale. Several different measures of fatigue were used in the studies. Results. Fifteen articles met the criteria for inclusion, including 10 distinct studies and one extension study. There was one placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial (RCT) and one extension, five single-arm, three high versus low, one intravenous versus subcutaneous and one switch from epoetin alfa to darbepoetin alfa. The only placebo-controlled RCT found a 22–26% improvement in fatigue. Single-arm cohort studies demonstrated a reduction in fatigue after a substantial increase in Hb. Studies with a baseline Hb <10 g/dL and partial correction to a minimum Hb ≥10 g/dL showed an average improvement in fatigue of 34.6%. Studies with a baseline Hb ≥11 g/dL and full correction to a minimum Hb ≥12 g/dL showed an average improvement in fatigue of 5.5%, while studies with no change in Hb (either placebo or control group) showed a decline of 0.7% in fatigue outcomes. Conclusion. Partial correction of anemia with ESA results in improvement of fatigue among patients on dialysis, most strikingly in those patients with baseline Hb levels <10 g/dL. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]