1. P05.78 Improving quality of care of meningioma patients: initial evaluation of issues in care trajectories according to the Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycle
- Author
-
Linda Dirven, Dieta Brandsma, W. R. van Furth, A. H. Zamanipoor Najafabadi, J P M van de Mortel, Martin J B Taphoorn, Daniel J. Lobatto, and Wilco C. Peul
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,Quality management ,Rehabilitation ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,medicine.disease ,Grounded theory ,Poster Presentations ,Meningioma ,Oncology ,Patient Self-Report ,medicine ,Patient evaluation ,Neurology (clinical) ,Medical emergency ,Quality of care ,business ,PDCA - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Meningioma are common benign intracranial tumours, that can cause severe neurological and daily functional problems, sometimes requiring lifelong care and support. Current practice and guidelines lack focus on these long-term sequelae. Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) initiatives aim to increase the value of care for patients, but continuous evaluation and improvement of these initiatives is required. According to the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle, a model for continuous healthcare evaluation and improvement, we explored issues in meningioma care trajectories, possible high impact initiatives to improve these issues, and the implementability of these initiatives. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Previously, issues in the meningioma care trajectories were identified through a survey by The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation. Using a grounded theory approach, a thematic framework was constructed based on this data and used for further data collection through three semi-structured interviews with patient-partner dyads (i.e. pairs) and four focus groups with patient-partner dyads and healthcare providers (both two focus groups). RESULTS: Issues in meningioma care trajectories reported by patient-partner dyads and healthcare providers were related to information, care and support, logistics, and diagnostics and treatment. Most important issues were lack of information about intervention and outcomes, and lack of support after treatment. A reported solution for many issues was the incorporation of a case manager. Other possible solutions were implementation of routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or a rehabilitation program, and formalization of these care trajectories. The most important barriers for these solutions were budget, capacity, ICT infrastructure, qualified personnel, and know-how. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a few simple solutions (e.g. case manager) may improve the majority of experienced issues in meningioma care trajectories. Information on the identified barriers and facilitators can be used to ensure successful implementation of these practice changing initiatives, which need iterative evaluation in PDSA cycles.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF