Search

Attention is a component of the working memory system, and is responsible for protecting task-relevant information from interference. Cognitive performance (particularly outside of the laboratory) is often plagued by interference, and the source of this interference, either external or internal, might influence the expression of individual differences in attentional ability. By definition, external attention (also described as "selective attention") protects working memory against sensorial distractors of all kinds, while internal attention (also called "inhibition") protects working memory against emotional impulses, irrelevant information from memory, and automatically-generated responses. At present, it is unclear if these two types of attention are expressed independently in non-human animals, and how they might differentially impact performance on other cognitive processes, such as learning. By using a diverse battery of four attention tests (with varying levels of internal and external sources of interference), here we aimed both to explore this issue, and to obtain a robust and general (less task-specific) measure of attention in mice. Exploratory factor analyses revealed two factors (external and internal attention) that in total, accounted for 73% of the variance in attentional performance. Confirmatory factor analyses found an excellent fit with the data of the model of attention that assumed an external and internal distinction (with a resulting correlation of 0.43). In contrast, a model of attention that assumed one source of variance (i.e., "general attention") exhibited a poor fit with the data. Regarding the relationship between attention and learning, higher resistance against external sources of interference promoted better new learning, but tended to impair performance when cognitive flexibility was required, such as during the reversal of a previously instantiated response. The present results suggest that there can be (at least) two types of attention that contribute to the common variance in attentional performance in mice, and that external and internal attentions might have opposing influences on the rate at which animals learn., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

"General cognitive ability" describes a trait that transcends specific learning domains and impacts a wide range of cognitive skills. Individual animals (including humans) exhibit wide variations in their expression of this trait. We have previously determined that the propensity for exploration is highly correlated with the general cognitive abilities of individual outbred mice. Here, we asked if inducing an increase in exploratory behaviors would causally promote an increase in animals' general learning abilities. In three experiments, juvenile and young-adult male CD-1 outbred mice were exposed to 12 novel environments starting at post-natal days 39 (juvenile) and 61 (young adult), after which they underwent a series of cognitive and exploratory tests as adults (beginning at post-natal day 79). Exposure to novel environments promoted increases in exploration (across multiple measures) on two different tasks, including an elevated plus maze. However, a subsequent test of general learning abilities (aggregate performance across five distinct learning tasks) determined that exposure to novel environments as juveniles or young-adults had no effect on general learning abilities in adulthood. Therefore, while exposure to novel environments promotes long-lasting increases in mice's exploratory tendencies, these increases in exploration do not appear to causally impact general learning abilities.

Across multiple learning tasks (that place different sensory, motor, and information processing demands on the animals), we have found that the performance of mice is commonly regulated by a single factor ("general learning") that accounts for 30-40% of the variance across individuals and tasks. Furthermore, individuals' general learning abilities were highly correlated with their propensity to engage in exploration in an open field, a behavior that is potentially stress-inducing. This relationship between exploration in the open field and general learning abilities suggests the possibility that variations in stress sensitivity/responsivity or related emotional responses might directly influence individuals' general learning abilities. Here, the relationship of sensory/motor skills and stress sensitivity/emotionality to animals' general learning abilities were assessed. Outbred (CD-1) mice were tested in a battery of six learning tasks as well as 21 tests of exploratory behavior, sensory/motor function and fitness, emotionality, and stress reactivity. The performances of individual mice were correlated across six learning tasks, and the performance measures of all learning tasks loaded heavily on a single factor (principal component analysis), accounting for 32% of the variability between animals and tasks. Open field exploration and seven additional exploratory behaviors (including those exhibited in an elevated plus maze) also loaded heavily on this same factor, although general activity, sensory/motor responses, physical characteristics, and direct measures of fear did not. In a separate experiment, serum corticosterone levels of mice were elevated in response to a mild environmental stressor (confinement on an elevated platform). Stress-induced corticosterone levels were correlated with behavioral fear responses, but were unsystematically related to individuals' propensity for exploration. In total, these results suggest that although general learning abilities are strongly related to individuals' propensity for exploration, this relationship is not attributable to variations in sensory/motor function or the individuals' physiological or behavioral sensitivity to conditions that promote stress or fear.

Up to 50% of an individuals' performance across a wide variety of distinct cognitive tests can be accounted for by a single factor (i.e., "general intelligence"). Despite its ubiquity, the processes or mechanisms regulating this factor are a matter of considerable debate. Although it has been hypothesized that working memory may impact cognitive performance across various domains, tests have been inconclusive due to the difficulty in isolating working memory from its overlapping operations, such as verbal ability. We address this problem using genetically diverse mice, which exhibit a trait analogous to general intelligence. The general cognitive abilities of CD-1 mice were found to covary with individuals' working memory capacity, but not with variations in long-term retention. These results provide evidence that independent of verbal abilities, variations in working memory are associated with general cognitive abilities, and further, suggest a conservation across species of mechanisms and/or processes that regulate cognitive abilities.

It is well established that the hippocampal formation is critically involved in the acquisition of trace memories, a paradigm in which the conditioned (CS) and unconditioned stimuli (US) are separated by a temporal gap (Solomon et al., 1986). The structure is reportedly not critical for the acquisition of delay memories, where the CS and the US overlap in time (Berger & Orr, 1983; Schmaltz & Theios, 1972). Based on these results, it is often stated that the hippocampus is involved in "filling the gap" or otherwise associating the two stimuli in time. However, in addition to the presence of a temporal gap, there are other differences between trace and delay conditioning. The most apparent difference is that animals require many more trials to learn the trace task, and thus it is inherently more difficult than the delay task. Here, we tested whether the hippocampus was critically involved in delay conditioning, if it was rendered more difficult such that the rate of acquisition was shifted to be analogous to trace conditioning. Groups of rats received excitotoxic lesions to the hippocampus, sham lesions or were left intact. Using the same interstimulus intervals (ISI), control animals required more trials to acquire the trace than the delay task. As predicted, animals with hippocampal lesions were impaired during trace conditioning but not delay conditioning. However, when the delay task was rendered more difficult by extending the ISI (a long delay task), animals with hippocampal lesions were impaired. In addition, once the lesioned animal learned the association between the CS and the US during delay conditioning, it could learn and perform the trace CR. Thus, the role of the hippocampus in classical conditioning is not limited to learning about discontiguous events in time and space; rather the structure can become engaged simply as a function of task difficulty., (Copyright 2001 Elsevier Science.)

The neurophysiological basis for context conditioning is conceptually problematic because neurophysiological descriptions of activity-dependent (associative) forms of neuronal plasticity uniformly assume that a specific temporal relationship between signals is necessary for memory induction. In the present experiments, this problem is addressed empirically by presenting, as a temporally diffuse contextual signal, a stimulus that results in known neural modifications following punctate (temporally contiguous) pairings with an aversive unconditioned stimulus. Hermissenda were trained to discriminate between adjoining contexts that were distinguished only in that one was lit and one was dark. Thirty unsignaled rotations were presented during each of three 15-min sessions in one of the two (lit or dark) contexts. Prior to training, animals displayed a slight preference for the lit context. After exposure to unsignaled rotation, animal's preferences shifted strongly to the dark context if unsignaled rotations were presented in the light, and tended (nonsignificantly) to the lit context if unsignaled rotations were presented in the dark. The B photoreceptors of the Hermissenda eye undergo several forms of activity-dependent facilitation (e.g., an increase in neuronal input resistance and evoked spike frequency) following pairings of punctate light (CS) and presynaptic vestibular stimulation (US). Similar facilitation in the B photoreceptor was observed following in vitro training that mimicked context conditioning in which presynaptic vestibular stimulation was presented repetitively during a continuous 7.5-min light. Subsequently, Ca(2+)-imaging experiments were conducted with Fura-2AM. It was determined that intracellular Ca(2+), the CS-induced second messenger critical for the induction of activity-dependent facilitation, was elevated in the B photoreceptor throughout the 7.5-min light presentation. These results indicate that activity-dependent facilitation within similar neural structures can underlie learning about both temporally diffuse contextual stimuli and temporally punctate CS-US pairings. These results suggest that a common mechanism may underlie learning about diffuse contextual stimuli as well as punctate-conditioned stimuli, provided that the stimuli are processed similarly in each type of conditioning arrangement. Consequently, the expression of different responses to contextual and discrete stimuli are likely to reflect a higher property of the neural network, and do not necessarily arise from unique underlying mechanisms., (Copyright 1999 Academic Press.)

A series of experiments is described that elucidates the sources of Ca2+ that contribute to activity-dependent neuronal facilitation in Hermissenda B photoreceptors during associative conditioning. In an in vitro preparation, pairings of a 4-s light with a 3-s mechanical stimulation of presynaptic hair cells increased the input resistance and elicited spike rate (i.e., excitability) of the B photoreceptors in the Hermissenda eye, indicative of a Ca(2+)-dependent process that is analogous to associative conditioning in the intact animal. This increase in excitability was reduced but not eliminated when hyperpolarizing current was applied to the B cell during the pairings, suggesting that voltage-dependent influx of Ca2+ contributed only a portion of the total calcium signal necessary for facilitation. Moreover, no increase in excitability was observed when a comparable current-induced depolarization of the photoreceptor was substituted for light-induced depolarization. In other experiments, Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation of a light-induced Na+ current was used as an index of intracellular Ca2+ concentration. It was determined that light caused a large increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration regardless of whether the photoreceptor was allowed to freely depolarize in response to light or was voltage clamped at its resting membrane potential. Current-induced depolarization produced a smaller increase, while presynaptic stimulation had no measurable effect. Intracellular injections of either heparin, an antagonist of intracellular Ca2+ release, or EGTA, a general Ca2+ chelator, induced comparable reductions of light-induced Ca2+ accumulation. Finally, intracellular injections of heparin blocked the pairing-induced increases in B cell excitability as effectively as injections of EGTA. Taken as a whole, these data suggest that Ca2+ release from intracellular stores may be sufficient for the induction of facilitation in this preparation, while Ca2+ influx through voltage-dependent channels may have an additive effect and provide further evidence for the ubiquitous role of Ca2+ in learning-related forms of neuronal plasticity.