Search

This prospective meta-analysis summarizes results from the CAPTAIN trial series, evaluating the effects of Cerebrolysin for moderate-severe traumatic brain injury, as an add-on to usual care. The study included two phase IIIb/IV prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Eligible patients with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) between 6 and 12 received study medication (50 mL of Cerebrolysin or physiological saline solution per day for ten days, followed by two additional treatment cycles with 10 mL per day for 10 days) in addition to usual care. The meta-analysis comprises the primary ensembles of efficacy criteria for 90, 30, and 10 days after TBI with a priori ordered hypotheses based on multivariate, directional tests. A total 185 patients underwent meta-analysis (mean admission GCS = 10.3, mean age = 45.3, and mean Baseline Prognostic Risk Score = 2.8). The primary endpoint, a multidimensional ensemble of functional and neuropsychological outcome scales indicated a “small-to-medium” sized effect in favor of Cerebrolysin, statistically significant at Day 30 and at Day 90 (Day 30: MWcombined = 0.60, 95%CI 0.52 to 0.66, p = 0.0156; SMD = 0.31; OR = 1.69; Day 90: MWcombined = 0.60, 95%CI 0.52 to 0.68, p = 0.0146; SMD = 0.34, OR = 1.77). Treatment groups showed comparable safety and tolerability profiles. The meta-analysis of the CAPTAIN trials confirms the safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin after moderate-severe TBI, opening a new horizon for neurorecovery in this field. Integration of Cerebrolysin into existing guidelines should be considered after careful review of internationally applicable criteria.

Traumatic brain injury is a multifaceted condition that encompasses a spectrum of injuries: contusions, axonal injuries in specific brain regions, edema, and hemorrhage. Brain injury determines a broad clinical and disability spectrum due to the implication of various cellular pathways, genetic phenotypes, and environmental factors. It is challenging to predict patient outcomes, to appropriately evaluate the patients, to determine a suitable treatment strategy and rehabilitation program, and to communicate with patient relatives. Biomarkers detected from body fluids are potential evaluation tools for traumatic brain injury patients. These may serve as internal indicators of cerebral damage, delivering valuable information about the dynamic cellular, biochemical, and molecular environments. The diagnostic and prognostic value of biomarkers tested both in animal models of traumatic brain injury is still under question, despite a considerable scientific literature. Recent publications emphasize that a more realistic approach involves combining multiple types of biomarkers with other investigative tools (imaging, outcome scales, and genetic polymorphisms). Additionally, there is increasing interest in the use of biomarkers as tools for treatment monitoring and as surrogate outcome variables to facilitate the design of distinct randomized controlled trials. This review highlights the latest available evidence regarding biomarkers in adults after traumatic brain injury and discusses new approaches in the evaluation of this patient group.

The objective of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cerebrolysin in treating patients after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) as an adjunct to standard care protocols. The trial was designed to investigate the clinical effects of Cerebrolysin in the acute (neuroprotective) stage and during early and long-term recovery as part of a neurorestorative strategy. The study was a phase IIIb/IV single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eligible patients with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) between 7 and 12 received study medication (50 ml of Cerebrolysin or physiological saline solution per day for 10 days, followed by two additional treatment cycles with 10 ml per day for 10 days) in addition to standard care. We tested ensembles of efficacy criteria for 90, 30, and 10 days after TBI with a priori ordered hypotheses using a multivariate, directional test, to reflect the global status of patients after TBI. The study enrolled 142 patients, of which 139 underwent formal analysis (mean age = 47.4, mean admission GCS = 10.4, and mean Baseline Prognostic Risk Score = 2.6). The primary endpoint, a multidimensional ensemble of 13 outcome scales, indicated a “small-to-medium”–sized effect in favor of Cerebrolysin, statistically significant at day 90 (MWcombined = 0.59, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.66, P = 0.0119). Safety and tolerability observations were comparable between treatment groups. Our trial confirms previous beneficial effects of the multimodal, biological agent Cerebrolysin for overall outcome after moderate to severe TBI, as measured by a multidimensional approach. Study findings must be appraised and aggregated in conjunction with existing literature, as to improve the overall level of insight regarding therapeutic options for TBI patients. The widely used pharmacologic intervention may benefit from a large-scale observational study to map its use and to establish comparative effectiveness in real-world clinical settings.