1. Psychophysic-psychological dichotomy in very early acute mTBI pain
- Author
-
David Yarnitsky, Shiri Fadel, Julia Begal, Elliot Sprecher, Noam Bosak, Hen Ben Lulu, Liat Honigman, Osnat Aspis, Rabia Salame, David Hochstein, Yelena Granovsky, Michele Sterling, Maya Reshef, Gila Hyams, Hany Bahouth, Shahar Grunner, Pora Kuperman, and Michal Granot
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Traumatic brain injury ,Pain ,Context (language use) ,Statistics, Nonparametric ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Time windows ,Physical Stimulation ,Psychophysics ,Humans ,Medicine ,Psychological testing ,Prospective Studies ,Stage (cooking) ,Prospective cohort study ,Brain Concussion ,Aged ,Pain Measurement ,Pain modulation ,Psychological Tests ,030222 orthopedics ,business.industry ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Physical therapy ,Female ,Observational study ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
ObjectiveTo characterize the pain-related somatosensory and psychological presentation of very early acute patients with a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).MethodsPatients with an mTBI participated in a prospective observational study undergoing clinical, psychophysic, and psychological assessment within 72 hours after the accident. Healthy controls underwent similar protocol.ResultsOne hundred acute patients with an mTBI (age 36 ± 12.5 [SD] years, range 19–67 years, 42 women) and 80 healthy controls (age 43 ± 14.3 years, range 24–74 years, 40 women) participated. Patients with an mTBI demonstrated a pronociceptive psychophysic response in most tests such as less efficient pressure-pain threshold–conditioned pain modulation (0.19 ±0.19±.09 vs. 0.91±.10 kg, p < 0.001) and lower temperature needed to elicit a Pain50 response (44.72 ± 0.26°C vs 46.41 ± 0.30°C, p < 0.001). Their psychophysic findings correlated with clinical pain measures, e.g., Pain50 temperature and mean head (r = −0.21, p = 0.045) and neck (r = −0.26, p = 0.011) pain. The pain-catastrophizing magnification subscale was the only psychological variable to show a difference from the controls, while no significant correlations were found between any psychological measures and the clinical or psychophysic pain measures.ConclusionsThere appears to be a dichotomy between somatosensory and psychological findings in the very early acute post-mTBI stage; while the first is altered and is associated with the clinical picture, the second is unchanged. In the context of the ongoing debate on the pathophysiologic nature of the post-mTBI syndrome, our findings support its “physical” basis, free of mental influence, at least in the short time window after the injury.
- Published
- 2018