1. Validation of serum neurofilaments as prognostic and potential pharmacodynamic biomarkers for ALS
- Author
-
Michael, Benatar, Lanyu, Zhang, Lily, Wang, Volkan, Granit, Jeffrey, Statland, Richard, Barohn, Andrea, Swenson, John, Ravits, Carlayne, Jackson, Ted M, Burns, Jaya, Trivedi, Erik P, Pioro, James, Caress, Jonathan, Katz, Jacob L, McCauley, Rosa, Rademakers, Andrea, Malaspina, Lyle W, Ostrow, Joanne, Wuu, Marka van, Blitterswijk, and CReATe Consortium
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Neurofilament ,Neurofilament light ,Intermediate Filaments ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ,Biology ,Aged ,business.industry ,Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ,Progressive muscular atrophy ,Middle Aged ,Serum samples ,medicine.disease ,Prognosis ,030104 developmental biology ,Sample size determination ,Pharmacodynamics ,Biomarker (medicine) ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,Human medicine ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Biomarkers - Abstract
ObjectiveTo identify preferred neurofilament assays and clinically validate serum neurofilament light (NfL) and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy (pNfH) as prognostic and potential pharmacodynamic biomarkers relevant to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) therapy development.MethodsIn this prospective, multicenter, longitudinal observational study of patients with ALS (n = 229), primary lateral sclerosis (n = 20), and progressive muscular atrophy (n = 11), biological specimens were collected, processed, and stored according to strict standard operating procedures (SOPs). Neurofilament assays were performed in a blinded manner by independent contract research organizations.ResultsFor serum NfL and pNfH measured using the Simoa assay, there were no missing data (i.e., technical replicates below the lower limit of detection were not encountered). For the Iron Horse and Euroimmun pNfH assays, such missingness was encountered in ∼4% and ∼10% of serum samples, respectively. Mean coefficients of variation for NfL in serum and CSF were both ∼3%. Mean coefficients of variation for pNfH in serum and CSF were ∼4%–5% and ∼2%–3%, respectively, in all assays. Baseline serum NfL concentration, but not pNfH, predicted the future Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) slope and survival. Incorporation of baseline serum NfL into mixed effects models of ALSFRS-R slopes yields an estimated sample size saving of ∼8%. Depending on the method used to estimate effect size, use of serum NfL (and perhaps pNfH) as pharmacodynamic biomarkers, instead of the ALSFRS-R slope, yields significantly larger sample size savings.ConclusionsSerum NfL may be considered a clinically validated prognostic biomarker for ALS. Serum NfL (and perhaps pNfH), quantified using the Simoa assay, has potential utility as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of treatment effect.
- Published
- 2020