3 results on '"Markman JD"'
Search Results
2. Evaluation of outcome measures for neurogenic claudication: A patient-centered approach.
- Author
-
Markman JD, Gewandter JS, Frazer ME, Pittman C, Cai X, Patel KV, Jahromi BS, Dworkin RH, Burke LB, and Farrar JT
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disability Evaluation, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment, Health Care methods, Pain Measurement methods, Severity of Illness Index, Surveys and Questionnaires, Walking physiology, Lumbar Vertebrae physiopathology, Spinal Stenosis complications
- Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether patients with neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis would prefer a treatment that makes it possible for them to walk farther or walk with less pain; to examine associations between this treatment preference and patient-reported and in-clinic treadmill testing measures of walking ability and walking-associated pain., Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 269 patients with neurogenic claudication were asked to report their pain intensity when walking, complete the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, rank their outcome preferences for treatment, and undergo standardized treadmill testing, including measures of final pain rating and time to first pain of moderate intensity (Tfirst). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize patient preferences for treatment outcome. Associations between self-report questionnaires and standardized treadmill testing outcomes were evaluated using Spearman correlations., Results: Seventy-nine percent of patients expressed a preference for treatment that allowed them to walk with less pain. Preference for reduced pain was associated with higher pain during daily walking, along with a shorter Tfirst and higher final pain severity on treadmill testing. In contrast, patient preference for treatment outcome was not associated with self-reported measures of daily walking capacity or walking distance on the treadmill., Conclusions: A majority of patients with neurogenic claudication prioritized walking with reduced pain over walking farther. Reduction in pain while walking may therefore constitute a sufficient patient-focused treatment outcome for the majority of these patients. These results have implications for clinical trial design and assessment of treatment efficacy in neurogenic claudication., (© 2015 American Academy of Neurology.)
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Double-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial of pregabalin for neurogenic claudication.
- Author
-
Markman JD, Frazer ME, Rast SA, McDermott MP, Gewandter JS, Chowdhry AK, Czerniecka K, Pilcher WH, Simon LS, and Dworkin RH
- Subjects
- Aged, Cross-Over Studies, Disability Evaluation, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Lumbar Vertebrae, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Pain etiology, Pain Measurement, Pregabalin, Spinal Stenosis complications, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid therapeutic use, Analgesics therapeutic use, Pain drug therapy, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid analogs & derivatives
- Abstract
Objectives: To test the effects of pregabalin on the induction of neurogenic claudication., Methods: This study was a randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled, 2-period, crossover trial. Twenty-nine subjects were randomized to receive pregabalin followed by active placebo (i.e., diphenhydramine) or active placebo followed by pregabalin. Each treatment period lasted 10 days, including a 2-step titration. Periods were separated by a 10-day washout period, including a 3-day taper phase after the first period. The primary outcome variable was the time to first moderate pain symptom (Numeric Rating Scale score ≥4) during a 15-minute treadmill test (Tfirst). Secondary outcome measures included pain intensity at rest, pain intensity at the end of the treadmill test, distance walked, and validated self-report measures of pain and functional limitation including the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, Oswestry Disability Index, and Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire., Results: No significant difference was found between pregabalin and active placebo for the time to first moderate pain symptom (difference in median Tfirst = -1.08 [95% confidence interval -2.25 to 0.08], p = 0.61). In addition, none of the secondary outcome measures of pain or functional limitation were significantly improved by pregabalin compared with active placebo., Conclusions: Pregabalin was not more effective than active placebo in reducing painful symptoms or functional limitations in patients with neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with neurogenic claudication, compared with diphenhydramine, pregabalin does not increase the time to moderate pain during a treadmill test., (© 2014 American Academy of Neurology.)
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.