Search

ObjectiveWe compared the effect of clopidogrel plus aspirin vs aspirin alone on functional outcome and quality of life in the Clopidogrel in High-risk Patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) trial of aspirin-clopidogrel vs aspirin alone after acute minor stroke or TIA.MethodsParticipants were assessed at 90 days for functional outcome using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and quality of life using the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D). Poor functional outcome was defined as mRS score of 2-6 at 90 days and poor quality of life as EQ-5D index score of 0.5 or less.ResultsPoor functional outcome occurred in 254 patients (9.9%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group, as compared with 299 (11.6%) in the aspirin group (p = 0.046). Poor quality of life occurred in 142 (5.5%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and in 175 (6.8%) in the aspirin group (p = 0.06). Disabling stroke at 90 days occurred in 166 (6.5%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and in 219 (8.5%) in the aspirin group (p = 0.01). In stratified analysis by subsequent stroke, there was no difference in 90-day functional outcome and quality of life between the 2 groups.ConclusionsIn patients with minor stroke or TIA, the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin appears to be superior to aspirin alone in improving the 90-day functional outcome, and this is consistent with a reduction in the rate of disabling stroke in the dual antiplatelet arm.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class II evidence that for patients with acute minor stroke or TIA, clopidogrel plus aspirin compared to aspirin alone improves 90-day functional outcome (absolute reduction of poor outcome 1.70%, 95% confidence interval 0.03%-3.42%).

ObjectivesTo investigate the prevalence, knowledge, and treatment of TIA in a Chinese adult population.MethodsWe conducted a complex, multistage, probability sampling-designed, cross-sectional, nationwide survey of 98,658 Chinese adults in 2010. Possible TIA cases were first identified by symptoms recall or self-reported history of TIA through face-to-face interviews, and the final diagnosis was then made by expert neurologists through phone interviews or record review.ResultsThe age-standardized prevalence of TIA was 2.27%. Clinically, only 16.0% of the participants were diagnosed before the study. The prevalence of TIA was higher in women and in patients who were older, had less education, were current smokers, lived in rural or undeveloped areas, and had a history of stroke, hypertension, myocardial infarction, dyslipidemia, or diabetes. Based on the survey responses, approximately 3.08% of Chinese adults had knowledge of TIA. Among patients with TIA, only 5.02% received treatment and 4.07% received guideline-recommended therapy.ConclusionsTIA is prevalent and an estimated 23.9 million people in China may have experienced a TIA. Public knowledge on TIA is very limited. TIA appears to be largely undiagnosed and untreated in China. There is an urgent need to develop strategies to improve the identification and appropriate management of TIA.

Background and Objectives: Guidelines for posterior circulation ischemic stroke (PCIS) treatment are lacking and outcome prediction is crucial for patients and clinicians. We aimed to develop and validate a prognostic score to predict the poor outcome for patients with PCIS., Methods: The score was developed from a prospective derivation cohort named the Third China National Stroke Registry (August 2015-March 2018) and validated in a spatiotemporal independent validation cohort (December 2017-March 2023) in China. Patients with PCIS with acute infarctions defined as hyperintense lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging were included in this study. The poor outcome was measured as modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 3-6 at 3 months after PCIS. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors for poor outcome. The prognostic score, namely PCIS Outcome Score (PCISOS), was developed by assigning points to variables based on their relative β-coefficients in the logistic model., Results: The PCISOS was derived from 3,294 patients (median age 62 [interquartile range (IQR) 55-70] years; 2,250 [68.3%] men) and validated in 501 patients (median age 61 [IQR 53-68] years; 404 [80.6%] men). Among them, 384 (11.7%) and 64 (12.8%) had poor outcome 3 months after stroke in respective cohorts. Age, mRS before admission, NIH Stroke Scale on admission, ischemic stroke history, infarction distribution, basilar artery, and posterior cerebral artery stenosis or occlusion were identified as independent predictors for poor outcome and included in PCISOS. This easy-to-use integer scoring system identified a marked risk gradient between 4 risk groups. PCISOS performed better than previous scores, with an excellent discrimination ( C statistic) of 0.80 (95% CI 0.77-0.83) in the derivation cohort and 0.81 (95% CI 0.77-0.84) in the validation cohort. Calibration test showed high agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes in both cohorts., Discussion: PCISOS can be applied for patients with PCIS with acute infarctions to predict functional outcome at 3 months post-PCIS. This simple tool helps clinicians to identify patients with PCIS with higher risk of poor outcome and provides reliable outcome expectations for patients. This information might be used for personalized rehabilitation plan and patient selection for future clinical trials to reduce disability and mortality.

Background and Objectives: The Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel with Aspirin in High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events II (CHANCE-2) trial showed that among Chinese patients with minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) who were carriers of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles, dual-antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor-aspirin reduced the 90-day risk of stroke without increased severe or moderate bleeding compared with clopidogrel-aspirin. However, whether dual-antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel beyond the 90 days of follow-up remained unclear. In this study, we reported 1-year follow-up outcomes of the CHANCE-2 trial., Methods: The CHANCE-2 trial is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 202 centers in China. Patients with a minor stroke or TIA who carried CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles were randomized within 24 hours after symptom onset, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive ticagrelor and placebo clopidogrel or to receive clopidogrel and placebo ticagrelor for 90 days; both groups received aspirin for the first 21 days. After day 90, treatment was as per the choice of the clinician and the patient., Results: Among 6,412 patients, the proportion of patients on ticagrelor plus aspirin, clopidogrel plus aspirin, ticagrelor alone, clopidogrel alone, aspirin alone, other antiplatelet, and no antiplatelet beyond month 3 to 1 year was 0.09%, 1.56%, 0.13%, 2.66%, 73.65%, 0.78%, and 21.13% in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and 0.03%, 1.63%, 0.19%, 2.60%, 72.83%, 0.66%, and 22.06% in the clopidogrel-aspirin group, respectively. The primary outcome of new stroke occurred in 252 patients (7.91%) in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and 310 patients (9.73%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group by 1 year of follow-up (hazard ratio 0.80; 95% CI 0.68-0.95; p = 0.007); new stroke beyond 3 months to 1 year occurred in 61 patients (2.07%) and 67 patients (2.32%) ( p = 0.48), respectively. Primary safety outcome of severe or moderate bleeding occurred in 17 patients (0.53%) in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and 20 patients (0.63%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group ( p = 0.61)., Discussion: For CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele carriers, early dual-antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor is superior to clopidogrel at 1 year in reducing recurrent stroke., Trial Registration Information: URL: clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04078737., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with minor stroke or TIA with TIACYP2C19 loss-of-function, ticagrelor plus aspirin for 21 days is superior to clopidogrel plus aspirin in reducing the 1-year risk of recurrent stroke.

Objective: To evaluate the interaction effect of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A 2 (Lp-PLA 2 ) activity on the efficacy and safety of dual/single antiplatelet therapy in patients with and without intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) by the Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events trial., Methods: Patients with both MRI analysis and Lp-PLA 2 testing results were included in the current subanalysis. The interaction of Lp-PLA 2 activity with the effects of dual and single antiplatelet therapy were analyzed through Cox proportional hazards regressions model., Results: Among the 797 patients, the mean age was 63.1 ± 10.8 years, 518 (65%) were men, 356 (44.7%) had ICAS, and 441 (55.3%) did not. There were significantly more patients with elevated Lp-PLA 2 activity in the ICAS group than in the non-ICAS group (43.8% vs 35.4%, p = 0.02). There was significant interaction between Lp-PLA 2 activity levels and the 2 antiplatelet therapies for prevention of stroke recurrences and combined vascular events even after adjustment for confounding factors exclusively for patients with ICAS ( p = 0.017, 0.017, respectively), but not for those without ( p = 0.332, 0.674, respectively). Compared with aspirin alone, dual antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced the risk of stroke recurrences and combined vascular events (adjusted hazard ratio 0.33 [0.12-0.89], p = 0.028; 0.33 [0.12-0.89], p = 0.028, respectively) for patients with ICAS and nonelevated Lp-PLA 2 activity., Conclusions: Presence of both ICAS and nonelevated Lp-PLA 2 activity may predict better response to dual antiplatelet therapy in prevention of recurrent strokes and combined vascular events for patients with minor stroke or high-risk TIA., Clinicaltrialsgov Identifier: NCT00979589., (© 2019 American Academy of Neurology.)