Search

ObjectiveTo identify markers of resistance to developing Parkinson disease (PD) among LRRK2 mutation carriers (LRRK2+), we carried out metabolomic profiling in individuals with PD and unaffected controls (UC), with and without the LRRK2 mutation.MethodsPlasma from 368 patients with PD and UC in the LRRK2 Cohort Consortium (LCC), comprising 118 LRRK2+/PD+, 115 LRRK2+/UC, 70 LRRK2−/PD+, and 65 LRRK2−/UC, and CSF available from 68 of them, were analyzed by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry. For 282 analytes quantified in plasma and CSF, we assessed differences among the 4 groups and interactions between LRRK2 and PD status, using analysis of covariance models adjusted by age, study site cohort, and sex, with p value corrections for multiple comparisons.ResultsPlasma caffeine concentration was lower in patients with PD vs UC (p < 0.001), more so among LRRK2+ carriers (by 76%) than among LRRK2− participants (by 31%), with significant interaction between LRRK2 and PD status (p = 0.005). Similar results were found for caffeine metabolites (paraxanthine, theophylline, 1-methylxanthine) and a nonxanthine marker of coffee consumption (trigonelline) in plasma, and in the subset of corresponding CSF samples. Dietary caffeine was also lower in LRRK2+/PD+ compared to LRRK2+/UC with significant interaction effect with the LRRK2+ mutation (p < 0.001).ConclusionsMetabolomic analyses of the LCC samples identified caffeine, its demethylation metabolites, and trigonelline as prominent markers of resistance to PD linked to pathogenic LRRK2 mutations, more so than to idiopathic PD. Because these analytes are known both as correlates of coffee consumption and as neuroprotectants in animal PD models, the findings may reflect their avoidance by those predisposed to develop PD or their protective effects among LRRK2 mutation carriers.

ObjectiveTo investigate whether women and men with Parkinson disease (PD) differ in their biochemical and clinical responses to long-term treatment with inosine.MethodsThe Safety of Urate Elevation in Parkinson’s Disease (SURE-PD) trial enrolled 75 people with early PD and baseline serum urate below 6 mg/dL and randomized them to 3 double-blinded treatment arms: oral placebo or inosine titrated to produce mild (6.1–7.0 mg/dL) or moderate (7.1–8.0 mg/dL) serum urate elevation for up to 2 years. Parkinsonism, serum urate, and plasma antioxidant capacity were measured at baseline and repeatedly on treatment; CSF urate was assessed once, at 3 months. Here in secondary analyses results are stratified by sex.ResultsInosine produced an absolute increase in average serum urate from baseline that was 50% greater in women (3.0 mg/dL) than in men (2.0 mg/dL), consistent with expected lower baseline levels in women. Similarly, only among women was CSF urate significantly greater on mild or moderate inosine (+87% [p < 0.001] and +98% [p < 0.001], respectively) than on placebo (in contrast to men: +10% [p = 0.6] and +14% [p = 0.4], respectively). Women in the higher inosine dosing group showed a 7.0 Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) points/year lower rate of decline vs placebo (p = 0.01). In women, slower rates of UPDRS change were associated with greater increases in serum urate (r = −0.52; p = 0.001), and with greater increases in plasma antioxidant capacity (r = −0.44; p = 0.006). No significant associations were observed in men.ConclusionsInosine produced greater increases in serum and CSF urate in women compared to men in the SURE-PD trial, consistent with the study's design and with preliminary evidence for slower clinical decline in early PD among women treated with urate-elevating doses of inosine.Clinicaltrials.gov identifierNCT00833690.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class II evidence that inosine produced greater urate elevation in women than men and may slow PD progression in women.

Objective To identify markers of resistance to developing Parkinson disease (PD) among LRRK2 mutation carriers (LRRK2+), we carried out metabolomic profiling in individuals with PD and unaffected controls (UC), with and without the LRRK2 mutation. Methods Plasma from 368 patients with PD and UC in the LRRK2 Cohort Consortium (LCC), comprising 118 LRRK2+/PD+, 115 LRRK2+/UC, 70 LRRK2−/PD+, and 65 LRRK2−/UC, and CSF available from 68 of them, were analyzed by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry. For 282 analytes quantified in plasma and CSF, we assessed differences among the 4 groups and interactions between LRRK2 and PD status, using analysis of covariance models adjusted by age, study site cohort, and sex, with p value corrections for multiple comparisons. Results Plasma caffeine concentration was lower in patients with PD vs UC (p < 0.001), more so among LRRK2+ carriers (by 76%) than among LRRK2− participants (by 31%), with significant interaction between LRRK2 and PD status (p = 0.005). Similar results were found for caffeine metabolites (paraxanthine, theophylline, 1-methylxanthine) and a nonxanthine marker of coffee consumption (trigonelline) in plasma, and in the subset of corresponding CSF samples. Dietary caffeine was also lower in LRRK2+/PD+ compared to LRRK2+/UC with significant interaction effect with the LRRK2+ mutation (p < 0.001). Conclusions Metabolomic analyses of the LCC samples identified caffeine, its demethylation metabolites, and trigonelline as prominent markers of resistance to PD linked to pathogenic LRRK2 mutations, more so than to idiopathic PD. Because these analytes are known both as correlates of coffee consumption and as neuroprotectants in animal PD models, the findings may reflect their avoidance by those predisposed to develop PD or their protective effects among LRRK2 mutation carriers.