Search

Background: Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) is a genetically heterogeneous neurodegenerative disease. The most frequent cause of autosomal dominant HSP is mutation of SPAST ( SPG4 locus), but additional pedigrees remain mutation negative by conventional screening despite linkage to SPG4 . Objective: To determine the frequency of genomic copy number aberrations of SPAST in autosomal dominant HSP. Methods: We developed and validated a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay targeting SPAST and SPG3A , another gene frequently involved in autosomal dominant HSP. In a multicenter study we subsequently investigated 65 index patients with autosomal dominant HSP, all of whom had previously been screened negative for SPAST mutations. Independent secondary samples, additional family members, and cDNA were analyzed to confirm positive findings. Results: Aberrant MLPA profiles were identified in 12 cases (18%). They exclusively affect SPAST , represent deletions, segregate with the disease, and are largely pedigree specific. Internal SPAST deletions entail expression of correspondingly shortened transcripts, which vary in stability. Age at onset in SPAST deletion carriers does not differ from that associated with other SPAST mutations. Conclusions: Partial SPAST deletions, but not SPAST amplifications and SPG3A copy number aberrations, represent an underestimated cause of autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia. Partial SPAST deletions are likely to act via haploinsufficiency.

Objective: To develop and evaluate a clinical Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS) to measure disease severity and progression. Methods: A 13-item scale was designed to rate functional impairment occurring in pure forms of spastic paraplegia (SP). Additional symptoms constituting a complicated form of SP are recorded in an inventory. Two independent patient cohorts were evaluated in a two-step validation procedure. Results: Application of SPRS requires less than 15 minutes and does not require any special equipment, so it is suitable for an outpatient setting. Interrater agreement of SPRS was high (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99). Reliability was further supported by high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.91). SPRS values were almost normally distributed without apparent floor or ceiling effect. Construct validity was shown by high correlation of SPRS to Barthel Index and the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (convergent validity) and low correlation to Mini-Mental Status Examination (discriminant validity). Conclusion: The Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale is a reliable and valid measure of disease severity.