Search

Whether treatment response in patients with Parkinson disease depends on brain atrophy is insufficiently understood. The goal of this study is to identify specific atrophy patterns associated with response to dopaminergic therapy and deep brain stimulation.In this study, we analyzed the association of gray matter brain atrophy patterns, as identified by voxel-based morphometry, with acute response to levodopa (N = 118) and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (N = 39). Motor status was measured as a change in points on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III score. Baseline values were obtained before surgery, after cessation of dopaminergic medication for at least 12 hours; response to medication was assessed after administration of a standardized dose of levodopa. Response to deep brain stimulation was measured three months after surgery in the clinical condition after withdrawal of dopaminergic medication.Although frontoparietal brain gray matter loss was associated with subpar response to deep brain stimulation, there was no significant link between brain atrophy and response to levodopa.We conclude that response to deep brain stimulation relies on gray matter integrity; hence, gray matter loss may present a risk factor for poor response to deep brain stimulation and may be considered when making decision regarding clinical practice.

Objective To compare directional monopolar, bipolar, and directional bipolar thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) in tremor patients. Methods Fourteen tremor patients (7 Essential Tremor and 7 Parkinson's Disease) implanted with directional DBS electrodes in the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) were enrolled. Side-effect thresholds of monopolar directional stimulation (DIRECT) were compared to circular DBS as well as, in a randomized design, to those of two different bipolar stimulation settings (BIPOLAR = circular anode; BI-DIRECT = directional anode). Tremor suppression (Tremor Rating Scale, TRS) right below the side-effect threshold was also assessed. Results Directional DBS in the individually best direction showed higher side-effect thresholds than circular DBS (p = 0.0063). The thresholds were raised further using either one of the bipolar stimulation paradigms (BIPOLAR p = 0.0029, BI-DIRECT p = 0.0022). The side-effect thresholds did not differ between both bipolar settings, but side-effects were less frequent with BI-DIRECT. No difference in TRS scores with stimulation just below the side-effect threshold was found between all stimulation conditions. Conclusions Side-effect thresholds of monopolar directional and bipolar stimulation with both circular and directional anodes were higher compared to traditional monopolar circular stimulation in the VIM. Bipolar DBS with directional anodes evoked side-effect less frequently than bipolar and monopolar directional stimulation. All stimulation settings had comparable effects on tremor suppression just below their side-effect thresholds. Thus, directional and different bipolar settings should be explored in patients with bothersome side-effects of thalamic stimulation when monopolar stimulation settings are not satisfying. Further studies are needed to explore the efficiency of the different bipolar stimulation paradigms.

Objectives First reports on the application of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the Nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) showed feasibility and safety of the intervention in patients with Alzheimer´s disease. However, clinical effects vary and the mechanisms of actions are still not well understood. The aim of this study was to characterize neuroimaging changes that are associated with the responsiveness to the treatment. Materials and Methods We examined preoperative T1-weighted MR images of ten patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) treated with DBS of the NBM and correlated the clinical outcome with volumetric differences of cortical thickness. Subsequently, we sought to identify brain regions that carry out the clinical effects by correlating the outcome with streamlines connected to the volume of activated tissue. Clinical assessments at baseline, 6 and 12 months after the intervention included the AD Assessment Scale as well as the mini mental status examination. Results A fronto-parieto-temporal pattern of cortical thickness was found to be associated with beneficial outcome. Modulation of streamlines connected to left parietal and opercular cortices was associated with better response to the intervention. Conclusion Our results indicate that patients with less advanced atrophy may profit from DBS of the NBM. We conclude that beneficial effects of the intervention are related to preserved fronto-parieto-temporal interplay.

Objective Thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is effective in reducing tics in patients with refractory Tourette syndrome at the short-term. Here, we report on the long-term outcome. Materials and Methods Seven patients underwent bilateral DBS between 2001 and 2008. The target was the centromedian nucleus, substantia periventricularis and nucleus ventro-oralis internus cross point of the thalamus. The effect on tics and side effects were evaluated with a variable follow-up duration of 12 to 78 months. Results Patient 1 and 2 showed good tic improvements of 81.6% (60 months) and 50% (36 months), respectively. However, side effects like reducing levels of energy and visual disturbances increased. In patient 1, the target was changed to the anterior part of the internal pallidum and patient 2 switched the stimulator permanently off. Patient 3 experiences still satisfying results with a tic improvement of 88.9% (78 months). Patient 4 and 7 showed minor tic improvements of 34% (16 months) and 9% (60 months), respectively. In both patients side effects became more severe and the target was changed to the anterior part of the internal pallidum. Patient 5 showed a tic improvement of 27.5% (12 months) and went abroad for stimulation of the external globus pallidus. Patient 6 developed cerebellar atrophy. He experienced several nonstimulation related side effects and turned the stimulator off. Conclusions There seems to be an increasing disbalance of therapeutic effects and side effects at long-term follow-up, often leading to either switching the stimulator off or new surgery with a different neuro-anatomic target.

It is still debated which neuroimaging technique should be preferred in targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for implantation of stimulating electrodes. In the present study, we systematically analyzed the different imaging techniques and their outcome in reports describing original data on bilateral STN stimulation in advanced Parkinson's disease. Five different imaging techniques to target the STN for implantation of stimulating electrodes were reported: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MRI in combination with ventriculography, MRI in combination with computed tomography (CT), CT, and CT in combination with ventriculography. We found that patients who underwent STN deep brain stimulation with MRI (regardless the use of an additional imaging technique) had a significantly better Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score (mean improvement 58%) as compared to patients who underwent STN deep brain stimulation with CT imaging (regardless the use of an additional imaging technique; mean improvement 47%).