Search

Background and Objectives There have been numerous recommendations for a starting dose of intrathecal ziconotide. The therapy remains underutilized partially due to reports of inefficacy and/or intolerance. This study describes short‐term outcomes of a high‐volume, low‐concentration bolus (HVLC‐B) ziconotide starting dose technique for patients with chronic spine pain. Intrathecal pumps are available with a Patient Therapy Manager (PTM), or patient‐controlled intrathecal bolus device. Commonly published recommendations for a bolus dose has been 10% of the daily dose. This article describes an inversion of the traditional 10% rule‐of‐thumb. This article describes using the basal rate at a lowest programmable dose and utilizing the bolus for the majority of the medication delivery. Such an inversion may be considered a high volume bolus. The lowest commercially available concentration of ziconotide from the manufacturer is 25 mcg/mL. Pope and Deer (Neuromodulation, 18, 414–420 [2015]) described use of a dilution down to 5 mcg/mL. For purposes of this article, such dilutions to one‐fifth of the commercially available solution are considered sufficiently dilute to qualify for the term “low concentration.” Furthermore, the patients in this analysis received dilutions down to one‐fiftieth of the lowest commercially available solution. Materials and Methods A case series of patients with chronic spine pain with or without radicular pain received a starting dose intrathecal ziconotide regimen based on a specific HVLC‐B technique. Efficacy, tolerability, and pump settings are reported and analyzed. Results In total, 17 patients were identified who started ziconotide with the specified HVLC‐B starting regimen. One of the 17 patients reported side effects that led to discontinuation of the therapy, although the side effect was not typical of ziconotide but rather likely attributable to other medications the patient was taking. Fifteen of the 17 reported improved pain control with intrathecal ziconotide. Sixteen of the 17 patients remained on intrathecal ziconotide throughout the 4.7‐month average follow‐up period. One patient who failed to obtain pain relief chose to remain on the therapy because of reported resolution of lower limb numbness. Conclusions The HVLC‐B starting regimen was effective and well tolerated in this short‐term study of patients with chronic spine pain. More studies are needed to better elucidate long‐term outcomes in larger patient populations.

Introduction Intrathecal (IT) drug infusion is an appropriate and necessary tool in the algorithm to treat refractory cancer and noncancer pain. The decision-making steps/methodology for selecting appropriate patients for implanted targeted drug delivery systems is controversial and complicated. Therefore, a consensus on best practices for determining appropriate use of IT drug infusion may involve testing/trialing this therapy before implantation. Methods This current Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) update was designed to address the deficiencies and emerging innovations since the previous PACC convened in 2012. A literature search identified publications available since the previous PACC publications in 2014, and relevant sources were contributed by the PACC members. After reviewing the literature, the panel determined the evidence levels and degrees of recommendations. The developed consensus was ranked as strong (>80%), moderate (50-79%), or weak ( Results The trialing for IT drug delivery systems (IDDS) remains an area of continued controversy. The PACC recommendations for trialing are presented in 34 consensus points and cover trialing for morphine, ziconotide, and medication admixtures; starting doses and titration practices; measurements of success; trial settings and monitoring; management of systemic opioids during trialing; and the role of psychological evaluation. Finally, the PACC describes clinical scenarios in which IT trialing is required or not required. Conclusion The PACC provides consensus guidance on best practices of trialing for IDDS implants. In addition, the PACC recommends that no trial may be required in certain patient populations.

Objectives The efficacy and safety of ziconotide as a single agent has been evaluated in few short-term clinical trials and open-label studies. Ziconotide use is challenging given its adverse effect (AE) profile. The objective of this study is to describe the long-term efficacy and AEs of ziconotide used as an adjunct to other intrathecal (IT) agents in chronic noncancer pain patients. Materials and Methods A case series of chronic noncancer pain patients who had suboptimal pain control from IT therapy. Ziconotide was introduced in the IT infusion mixture after a successful ziconotide trial. Pain scores, IT doses, as well as AEs were recorded and analyzed from trial to initial ziconotide infusion and up to 24 months. Results Fifteen patients underwent ziconotide trials. Four subjects failed the trial, and 11 proceeded to continuous ziconotide treatment. Seven out of 11 patients experienced AEs resulting in ziconotide discontinuation. Two of the seven subjects who required discontinuation of ziconotide had improved pain. Four subjects were able to continue IT ziconotide through 24 months. Conclusions A high incidence of AEs limits the usefulness of IT ziconotide as adjunct therapy. Our results are limited by the size of our patient population; however, they represent a long follow-up period, which is limited in most current publications on this IT peptide. While ziconotide is a needed IT agent, more studies are necessary to better understand the factors that would improve the treatment to trial ratio as well as the long-term efficacy of IT ziconotide treatment.

Objectives Ziconotide is often administered in combination with other analgesics via an intrathecal pump. Studies have established that ziconotide is stable when delivered alone in high concentrations. No stability data are available, however, for ziconotide given in low concentrations and/or with other analgesics as usually occurs in clinical oncology practice. The objective of this study was to assess the in vitro stability of ziconotide alone and combined with other analgesics in intrathecal pumps at 37°C, as well as in syringes at 5°C, to evaluate conditions for storing and transporting preparations. Materials and Methods Various ziconotide concentrations (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 μg/mL) were combined with an admixture of ropivacaine (7.5 mg/mL), morphine (7.5 mg/mL), and clonidine (15 μg/mL) in 20-mL intrathecal pumps at 37°C and in syringes at 5°C. Solutions of ziconotide alone in concentrations of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 μg/mL were introduced into pumps at 37°C and syringes at 5°C. Assays were performed using ultra high pressure liquid chromatography. Results In admixtures, mean ziconotide concentrations decreased linearly to 53.4% (±3.33%) of baseline after 35 days. When ziconotide was introduced alone in pumps at 37°C, the residual concentration on day 31 was 35.54% (±0.04%) with 0.25 μg/mL, 39.37% (±0.15%) with 0.5 μg/mL, and 44.49% (±0.18%) with 1 μg/mL. Ziconotide alone or combined with the other analgesics was stable in syringes stored at 5°C. The preparations complied with the prescriptions, with a mean error of less than 10%, except with the lowest ziconotide concentration (0.1 μg/mL). Conclusions At the low ziconotide concentrations studied, the degradation of ziconotide admixed with other drugs was linear and only weakly influenced by the baseline concentration. Linear regression with intrapolation to 30 days showed that the degradation of ziconotide admixed with other drugs was consistent with previously published data.

Objective The objective of this study was to identify best practices and provide guidance to clinicians to ensure safety and optimize intrathecal drug delivery for chronic intractable pain. Methods Twelve experienced pain medicine practitioners—eight anesthesiologists, one neurosurgeon, one physiatrist, one clinical psychologist, and one advanced practice registered nurse—from the United States, Australia, and Europe gathered to identify and publish consensus on best practices in three areas related to safe intrathecal therapy for pain: safety and monitoring, patient and device management, and patient selection and trialing. Conclusions Intrathecal drug delivery is a valuable alternative drug delivery system for many patients with severe chronic or end-of-life pain. While device-related complications (mostly with catheters) and surgical-site infections can occur, the main therapy-related safety issues associated with intrathecal drug delivery arise primarily with inadequate patient monitoring (e.g., respiratory depression), inflammatory mass (e.g., high doses and concentrations of opioids), wound healing, dosing errors (e.g., medication concentration and pump programming), pump fills or refills (e.g., pocket fills), and interaction with concomitant systemic medications (e.g., opioids and benzodiazepines). Many of the reported adverse events and complications of intrathecal drug delivery can be prevented by adequate clinician training, implementation of best practices, and experience. In adopting the therapy, patients must be apprised of its risks and benefits. Physicians and patients must partner to achieve both safety and effectiveness.

Introduction: The use of intrathecal (IT) infusion of analgesic medications to treat patients with chronic refractory pain has increased since its inception in the 1980s, and the need for clinical research in IT therapy is ongoing. The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) panel of experts convened in 2000, 2003, and 2007 to make recommendations on the rational use of IT analgesics based on preclinical and clinical literature and clinical experiences. Methods: The PACC panel convened again in 2011 to update the standard of care for IT therapies to reflect current knowledge gleaned from literature and clinical experience. A thorough literature search was performed, and information from this search was provided to panel members. Analysis of published literature was coupled with the clinical experience of panel members to form recommendations regarding the use of IT analgesics to treat chronic pain. Results: After a review of literature published from 2007 to 2011 and discussions of clinical experience, the panel created updated algorithms for the rational use of IT medications for the treatment of neuropathic pain and nociceptive pain. Conclusions: The advent of new algorithmic tracks for neuropathic and nociceptive pain is an important step in improving patient care. The panel encourages continued research and development, including the development of new drugs, devices, and safety recommendations to improve the care of patients with chronic pain.

Ziconotide is a peptide that blocks N-type calcium channels and is antihyperalgesic after intrathecal (IT) delivery. We here characterize the spinal kinetics of IT bolus and infused ziconotide in dog. Male beagle dogs (N= 5) were prepared with chronic IT lumbar injection and cerebrospinal fluid (LCSF) sampling catheters connected to vest-mounted pumps. Each dog received the following: 1) IT bolus ziconotide (10 µg + 1 µCi (3) H-inulin); 2) IT infusion for 48 hours of ziconotide (1 µg/100 µL/hour); 3) IT infusion for 48 hours of ziconotide (5 µg/100 µL/hour); and 4) intravenous injection of ziconotide (0.1 mg/kg). After IT bolus, LCSF ziconotide and inulin showed an initial peak and biphasic (distribution/elimination) clearance (ziconotide T(1/2-α/β) = 0.14 and 1.77 hours, and inulin T(1/2-α/β) = 0.16 and 3.88 hours, respectively). The LCSF : plasma ziconotide concentration ratio was 20,000:1 at 30 min and 30:1 at eight hours. IT infusion of 1 and then 5 µg/hour resulted in LCSF concentrations that peaked by eight hours and remained stable at 343 and 1380 ng/mL, respectively, to the end of the 48-hour infusions. Terminal elimination T(1/2) after termination of continuous infusion was 2.47 hours. Ziconotide LCSF : cisternal CSF : plasma concentration ratios after infusion of 1 and 5 µg/hour were 1:0.017:0.001 and 1:0.015:0.003, respectively. IT infusion of ziconotide at 1 µg/hour inhibited thermal skin twitch by 24 hours and produced modest trembling, ataxia, and decreased arousal. Effects continued through the 48-hour infusion period, increased in magnitude during the subsequent 5 µg/hour infusion periods, and disappeared after drug clearance. After IT bolus or infusion, ziconotide displays linear kinetics that are consistent with a hydrophilic molecule of approximately 2500 Da that is cleared slightly more rapidly than inulin from the LCSF. Behavioral effects were dose dependent and reversible.

Objectives: This study evaluated efficacy and safety of bolus doses of ziconotide (Prialt®, Eisai Limited, Hertfordshire, UK) to assess the option of continuous administration of this drug via an implanted intrathecal drug delivery system. Materials and Methods: Twenty adults with severe chronic pain who were under consideration for intrathecal (IT) therapy were enrolled in this open label, nonrandomized, pilot study. Informed consent was obtained. Demographics, medical/pain history, pain scores, and concomitant medications were recorded. A physical examination was performed. Creatine kinase was measured. Initial visual analog scale (VAS), blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate were recorded. All patients received an initial bolus dose of 2.5 mcg ziconotide; the dose in the subsequent visits was modified according to response. Subsequent doses were 2.5 mcg, 1.2 mcg, or 3.75 mcg as per protocol. A good response (30% reduction in baseline pain VAS) with no side-effects on two occasions was considered a successful trial. Data were analyzed using a generalized estimating equations model, with pain VAS as the outcome and time (seven time points; preinjection and one to six hours postinjection) as the predictor. Results: Generalized estimating equations analysis of summary measures showed a mean reduction of pain VAS of approximately 25% at the group level; of 11 responders, seven underwent pump implantation procedure, two withdrew because of adverse effects, one refused an implant, and one could not have an implant (lack of funding from the Primary Care Trust). Conclusions: Our data demonstrated that mean VAS was reduced by approximately 25% at the group level after IT ziconotide bolus. Treatment efficacy did not vary with sex, center, age, or pain etiology. Ziconotide bolus was generally well tolerated. Larger studies are needed to determine if bolus dosing with ziconotide is a good predictor of response to continuous IT ziconotide via an intrathecal drug delivery system.

Objectives. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of long-term intrathecal (IT) ziconotide infusion. Materials and Methods. In this prospective study, 155 patients with severe chronic pain (48 with malignant pain, 107 with nonmalignant pain) who had been responsive to short-term IT ziconotide in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study received long-term, open-label IT ziconotide monotherapy. Efficacy assessments included the mean percentage change on the visual analog scale of pain intensity from baseline in the study of origin; safety was monitored by adverse event (AE) reports, periodic laboratory tests, and vital sign measurements. Results. At the last available observation, the visual analog scale of pain intensity scores had decreased by a mean of 36.9% from baseline in the short-term trial (N = 144; 95% CI: 30.1–43.7%; p

Objective. The safety and efficacy of intrathecal (IT) ziconotide was studied in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Materials and Methods. Patients (169 ziconotide, 86 placebo) with severe chronic nonmalignant pain unresponsive to conventional therapy and a visual analog scale of pain intensity (VASPI score) ≥ 50 mm were treated over a 6-day period in an inpatient hospital setting. Initial starting dose was 0.4 µg/hour and was titrated to analgesia or intolerance (maximum dose 7.0 µg/hour). The starting and maximum doses were reduced to 0.1 µg/hour and 2.4 µg/hour, respectively, due to adverse events (AEs). Results. The mean percent reduction in VASPI score from baseline was 31.2% and 6.0% for ziconotide- and placebo-treated patients, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). During the initial titration phase, a significantly greater percentage of patients in the ziconotide group compared to the placebo group reported AEs, including abnormal gait, amblyopia, dizziness, nausea, nystagmus, pain, urinary retention, and vomiting. Conclusion. Ziconotide provided significant analgesia in patients for whom conventional therapy failed. However, there was a considerable incidence of ziconotide-associated AEs due to the rapid titration and high doses administered.

Objective. To determine the stability of an admixture combining ziconotide with bupivacaine hydrochloride during simulated intrathecal infusion under laboratory conditions at 37°. Materials and Methods. An admixture containing ziconotide (25 µg/mL) and bupivacaine hydrochloride (5 mg/mL) was stored in SynchroMed® II pumps at 37° and in control vials at either 37° or 5°. Using high-performance liquid chromatography, drug concentrations were determined from samples obtained at varying intervals during the 30-day study. Results. After 30 days, pump ziconotide and bupivacaine hydrochloride concentrations measured an average of 86.9% and 99.4% of their initial concentrations, respectively. Control vials displayed similar degradation rates for both drugs. Statistical evaluation of the ziconotide 95% confidence interval indicated that the ziconotide concentration would meet or exceed 90% and 80% of initial concentration for 22 days and 45 days, respectively. Conclusions. An admixture containing 25 µg/mL ziconotide and 5 mg/mL bupivacaine hydrochloride was 90% stable for 22 days and 80% stable for 45 days (extrapolated) in SynchroMed® II infusion pumps.

Objective. To determine the stability of ziconotide–clonidine hydrochloride admixtures with and without morphine sulfate during simulated intrathecal infusion under laboratory conditions at 37°. Materials and Methods. Admixtures of ziconotide (25 µg/mL) and clonidine hydrochloride (2 mg/mL) with and without morphine sulfate (35 mg/mL) were stored in Medtronic SynchroMed® II pumps at 37°. Pumps were sampled immediately after filling and at four additional time points over the course of 28 (ziconotide–clonidine hydrochloride admixture) or 20 (ziconotide–clonidine hydrochloride–morphine sulfate admixture) days. Drug concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. Results. Ziconotide concentration exceeded 97% of initial at all time points when combined with clonidine alone; statistical evaluation indicated that both ziconotide and clonidine concentrations would remain above 90% of initial for more than 60 days. When compounded with both clonidine and morphine, ziconotide and clonidine concentrations declined; statistical evaluation indicated that the ziconotide concentration was 70% of initial after 20 days, and that clonidine would remain 90% stable for 42 days. Morphine was stable in the presence of ziconotide and clonidine. Conclusions. A ziconotide-clonidine admixture was 90% stable for 60 days (extrapolated), and a ziconotide-clonidine-morphine admixture was 70% stable for 20 days.

Objective. To determine the stability of admixtures combining ziconotide with morphine or hydromorphone under simulated intrathecal infusions. Materials and Methods. Admixtures of ziconotide (25 µg/mL) with morphine or hydromorphone (both at 35 mg/mL) were stored in Medtronic SynchroMed® II pumps at 37°C, and in control vials at 37°C and 5°C. Drug concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. Results. The ziconotide pump concentration with morphine declined to 79% of initial in 17 days, and to 88% of initial after 25 days with hydromorphone. Ziconotide concentrations in control vials stored at 37°C displayed similar rates of decay, but vials stored at 5°C exhibited no ziconotide loss. A statistical evaluation of the two combinations shows ziconotide–hydromorphone retaining 80% stability for 40 days (extrapolated), compared to 15 days for ziconotide–morphine. Morphine and hydromorphone were stable in the presence of ziconotide under all conditions. Conclusions. Ziconotide–hydromorphone admixtures were more stable than ziconotide–morphine admixtures.

Objective: Non-psychological parameters may predict pump success. Methods: Review was performed on 35 implants for gender, age, pretrial/trial dose, baseline visual analog scale (VAS), and pain location. One-year outcomes were % change VAS/intrathecal dose and medication change. Spearman coefficients correlated pretrial/trial dose, age, baseline VAS, and % change in VAS/intrathecal dose. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests correlated gender/pain location and % change in VAS/intrathecal dose. Pretrial/trial dose, baseline VAS, and medication change was tested using Wilcoxon Rank-Sums. Chi-square was used to correlate medication change with gender/pain location. A two-sample t-test compared age and medication change. Results: Positive correlation between % change VAS and trial dose was noted. Greater age correlated with lower VAS and % dose change. Marginally significant difference in % dose change by pain location was present with higher doses for leg pain. Conclusion: Trial dose, age, and partially pain location are good predictors of pain relief.