Search

Aims: DNA methylation profiling, recently endorsed by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as a pivotal diagnostic tool for brain tumours, most commonly relies on bead arrays. Despite its widespread use, limited data exist on the technical reproducibility and potential cross-institutional differences. The LOGGIC Core BioClinical Data Bank registry conducted a prospective laboratory comparison trial with 12 international laboratories to enhance diagnostic accuracy for paediatric low-grade gliomas, focusing on technical aspects of DNA methylation data generation and profile interpretation under clinical real-time conditions., Methods: Four representative low-grade gliomas of distinct histologies were centrally selected, and DNA extraction was performed. Participating laboratories received a DNA aliquot and performed the DNA methylation-based classification and result interpretation without knowledge of tumour histology. Additionally, participants were required to interpret the copy number profile derived from DNA methylation data and conduct DNA sequencing of the BRAF hotspot p.V600 due to its relevance for low-grade gliomas. Results had to be returned within 30 days., Results: High technical reproducibility was observed, with a median pairwise correlation of 0.99 (range 0.94-0.99) between coordinating laboratory and participants. DNA methylation-based tumour classification and copy number profile interpretation were consistent across all centres, and BRAF mutation status was accurately reported for all cases. Eleven out of 12 centres successfully reported their analysis within the 30-day timeframe., Conclusion: Our study demonstrates remarkable concordance in DNA methylation profiling and profile interpretation across 12 international centres. These findings underscore the potential contribution of DNA methylation analysis to the harmonisation of brain tumour diagnostics., (© 2024 The Author(s). Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Neuropathological Society.)

Aims: Wnt activation in medulloblastomas is associated with good outcome. Upfront testing and risk-adapted stratification of patients will be done in future clinical studies. In a cohort of 186 paediatric medulloblastomas our aim was to identify the optimal methods in standard clinical practice to detect this subgroup., Methods: Nuclear accumulation of β-catenin was analysed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). DNA of FFPE tissue was amplified by PCR for single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and direct sequencing of CTNNB1 exon 3. Copy number of chromosome 6 was analysed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and molecular inversion profiling., Results: Different automated immunostaining systems showed similar results. Twenty-one of 186 samples had nuclear accumulation in ≥5% of cells, 17 samples showed <5% β-catenin positive nuclei. None of these 17 cases had CTNNB1 mutations, but 18 of 21 cases with ≥5% accumulation did, identifying these 18 cases as Wnt-subgroup medulloblastomas. Fifteen of 18 mutated cases showed monosomy 6, 3 had balanced chromosome 6. On the contrary, none of the CTNNB1 wild-type tumours had monosomy 6., Conclusions: Standard neuropathological evaluation of medulloblastoma samples should include IHC of β-catenin because tumours with high nuclear accumulation of β-catenin most probably belong to the Wnt subgroup of medulloblastomas. Still, IHC alone may be insufficient to detect all Wnt cases. Similarly, chromosome 6 aberrations were not present in all CTNNB1-mutated cases. Therefore, we conclude that sequencing analysis of CTNNB1 exon 3 in combination with β-catenin IHC (possibly as pre-screening method) is a feasible and cost-efficient way for the determination of Wnt medulloblastomas., (© 2014 British Neuropathological Society.)