Search

Aims: Anaplastic ganglioglioma is a rare tumour, and diagnosis has been based on histological criteria. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System (CNS WHO) does not list anaplastic ganglioglioma as a distinct diagnosis due to lack of molecular data in previous publications. We retrospectively compiled a cohort of 54 histologically diagnosed anaplastic gangliogliomas to explore whether the molecular profiles of these tumours represent a separate type or resolve into other entities., Methods: Samples were subjected to histological review, desoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation profiling and next-generation sequencing. Morphological and molecular data were summarised to an integrated diagnosis., Results: The majority of tumours designated as anaplastic gangliogliomas resolved into other CNS WHO diagnoses, most commonly pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (16/54), glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase protein (IDH) wild type and diffuse paediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3 wild type and IDH wild type (11 and 2/54), followed by low-grade glial or glioneuronal tumours including pilocytic astrocytoma, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour and diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumour (5/54), IDH mutant astrocytoma (4/54) and others (6/54). A subset of tumours (10/54) was not assignable to a CNS WHO diagnosis, and common molecular profiles pointing to a separate entity were not evident., Conclusions: In summary, we show that tumours histologically diagnosed as anaplastic ganglioglioma comprise a wide spectrum of CNS WHO tumour types with different prognostic and therapeutic implications. We therefore suggest assigning this designation with caution and recommend comprehensive molecular workup., (© 2022 The Authors. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Neuropathological Society.)

Aims: KIAA1549-BRAF fusions occur in certain brain tumours and provide druggable targets due to a constitutive activation of the MAP-kinase pathway. We introduce workflows for calling the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion from DNA methylation array-derived copy number as well as DNA panel sequencing data., Methods: Copy number profiles were analysed by automated screening and visual verification of a tandem duplication on chromosome 7q34, indicative of the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion. Pilocytic astrocytomas of the ICGC cohort with known fusion status were used for validation. KIAA1549-BRAF fusions were called from DNA panel sequencing data using the fusion callers Manta, Arriba with modified filtering criteria and deFuse. We screened DNA methylation and panel sequencing data of 7790 specimens from brain tumour and sarcoma entities., Results: We identified the fusion in 337 brain tumours with both DNA methylation and panel sequencing data. Among these, we detected the fusion from copy number data in 84% and from DNA panel sequencing data in more than 90% using Arriba with modified filters. While in 74% the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion was detected from both methylation array-derived copy number and panel sequencing data, in 9% it was detected from copy number data only and in 16% from panel data only. The fusion was almost exclusively found in pilocytic astrocytomas, diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumours and high-grade astrocytomas with piloid features., Conclusions: The KIAA1549-BRAF fusion can be reliably detected from either DNA methylation array or DNA panel data. The use of both methods is recommended for the most sensitive detection of this diagnostically and therapeutically important marker., (© 2020 The Authors. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Neuropathological Society.)

Aims: Mutations of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1/2 affect almost all astrocytomas of WHO grade II and III. A subset of IDH-mutant astrocytic tumours progresses to IDH-mutant glioblastoma or presents with the histology of a glioblastoma at first presentation. We set out here to assess the molecular spectrum of IDH-mutant glioblastomas., Methods: We performed an integrated molecular analysis of a mono-centric cohort (n = 97); assessed through genome-wide DNA methylation analysis, copy-number profiling and targeted next generation sequencing using a neurooncology-tailored gene panel., Results: Of these 97 IDH-mutant glioblastomas, 68 had a glioblastoma at first presentation ('de novo' IDH-mutant glioblastoma) and 29 emerged from a prior low-grade lesion ('evolved' IDH-mutant glioblastoma). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of DNA methylation data disclosed that IDH-mutant glioblastoma ('de novo' and 'evolved') formed a distinct group separate from other diffuse glioma subtypes. Homozygous deletions of CDKN2A/B were found to be associated with shorter survival., Conclusions: This study demonstrates DNA methylation patterns in IDH-mutant glioblastoma to be distinct from lower-grade astrocytic counterparts but homogeneous within de novo and evolved IDH-mutant glioblastomas, and identifies CDKN2A as a marker for possible genetic sub-stratification., (© 2018 British Neuropathological Society.)