Search

Objective Mean speed of responding is the most commonly used measure in the assessment of reaction time (RT). An alternative measure is intraindividual variability (IIV): the inconsistency of responding across multiple trials of a test. IIV has been suggested as an important indicator of central nervous system functioning, and as such, there has been increasing interest in the associations between IIV and brain imaging metrics. Results however, have been inconsistent. The present seeks to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the associations between a variety of measures of brain white matter integrity and individual differences in choice RT (CRT) IIV. Method MRI brain scans of members of the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 were assessed to obtain measures of the volume and severity of white matter hyperintensities, and the integrity of brain white matter tracts. CRT was assessed with a 4 CRT task on a separate occasion. Data were analyzed using multiple regression (N range = 358-670). Results Greater volume of hyperintensities and more severe hyperintensities in frontal regions were associated with higher CRT IIV. White matter tract integrity, as assessed by both fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity, showed the smallest effect sizes in associations with CRT IIV. Associations with hyperintensities were attenuated and no longer significant after controlling for M CRT. Conclusions Taken together, the results of the present study suggested that IIV was not incrementally predictive of white matter integrity over mean speed. This is in contrast to previous reports, and highlights the need for further study. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of high altitude on reaction time (RT) mean and intra-individual variability. METHOD: Ten students (6 men, 4 women) took a 4-choice RT test and had their vital signs and Lake Louise (LL) score measured on 21 occasions during the Edinburgh Altitude Research Expedition of 2008 to the Western Himalayas (max. altitude 5,565 m). RESULTS: Linear mixed modeling revealed that mean RT was significantly impaired at altitudes above 4,000 m (p < .001), but relatively unaffected below that threshold. An estimated increase in RT between 4,000 and 5,000 m was 15.5 ms, 95% CI [11.1, 19.9]. LL score was related to slower RTs (B = 1.97, 95% CI [0.70, 3.23], p < .01), while number of errors was associated with faster RTs (B = -1.50, 95% CI [-2.60, -0.39], p < .01). There were persistent practice effects in mean RT (B = -2.16, 95% CI [-2.49, -1.83], p < .001. Log-transformed intra-individual variability in RT increased with higher LL scores (B = 0.01801, 95% CI [0.0049, 0.0311], p < .01) and decreased with rising temperature (B = -0.00754, 95% CI [-0.0119, -0.0032], p < .001). However, after controlling for mean RT, these effects were no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: RTs become significantly impaired above a threshold of 4,000 m. Altitude-related changes in RT intra-individual variability were accounted for by mean RT.