Search

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) plays an important role in processes associated with neuroplasticity and neuroprotection. Evidence suggests that decreased BDNF levels in the central nervous system (CNS) represent a mechanism underlying the development of mood disorders. We hypothesize that both congenital and traumatic brain injury (mTBI)-induced blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown are responsible for brain BDNF depletion that contributes to the development of depressive-like symptoms. We employed a mouse model of innate differences in BBB integrity with high (HA) and low (LA) permeability. Depressive-like behaviours were determined under chronic mild stress (CMS) conditions or following mTBI using the tail suspension test (TST). Microvascular leakage of the BBB was evaluated using the Evans Blue Dye (EBD) extravasation method. BDNF concentrations in the brain and plasma were measured using the ELISA. Control HA mice with congenitally high BBB permeability showed exacerbated depressive-like behaviours compared with LA mice. In LA mice, with normal BBB function, mTBI, but not CMS, facilitated depressive-like behaviours, which correlated with enhanced BDNF efflux from the brain. In addition, mTBI triggered upregulation of the Bdnf gene in LA mice to compensate for BDNF loss. No alterations in BDNF levels were observed in mTBI and CMS-exposed HA mice. Moreover, CMS did not induce BBB damage or affect depressive-like behaviours in HA mice despite downregulating Bdnf gene expression. To conclude, BDNF efflux through the mTBI-disrupted BBB is strongly linked to the development of depressive-like behaviours, while the depressive phenotype in mice with congenital BBB dysfunction is independent of BDNF leakage.

Bidirectional selection of mice for high (HA) and low (LA) swim stress-induced analgesia (SSIA) is associated with a divergent response to opioids. In the current study, we investigated whether the genetic divergence in opioid system activity between HA and LA mice also affects cannabinoid sensitivity. Additionally, we also investigated whether the endocannabinoid system mediates SSIA in these lines. Numerous reports support the existence of pharmacological and molecular interactions between the opioid and cannabinoid systems along the pain pathways, as both systems utilize the same G-protein subtype for signal transduction. Mice from both lines were treated with a non-selective CB1/CB2 agonist, WIN55,212-2 and their behavior was evaluated according to the tetrad paradigm assessing antinociception, catalepsy, hypothermia and locomotor activity. Surprisingly, the engagement of CB1 receptors in SSIA was not confirmed. G-protein activation was studied in different brain regions and the spinal cord in the [35S]GTPγS assay. It was shown that WIN55,212-2 produced more potent antinociception in HA than in LA mice. Also, HA mice displayed stronger cannabinoid-induced catalepsy in the bar test. However, LA mice were more sensitive to the hypothermic effect of WIN55,212-2. The intensity of behavioral responses to WIN55,212-2 was correlated with increased G-protein activation in the periaqueductal gray matter, frontal cortex, striatum and thalamus in HA mice. A weak response to WIN55,212-2 in LA mice could depend on impaired CB2 receptor signaling. In conclusion, differences in both opioid and cannabinoid sensitivity between HA and LA mice could stem from alterations in intracellular second messenger mechanisms involving G-protein activation.