Search

Aims To compare the effects of manual visceral therapy (MVT) associated with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) on urinary incontinence (UI) symptoms, vaginal resting pressure, and maximum voluntary contraction of the pelvic floor muscles (PFM). Methods A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of 5 weeks duration with two active intervention arms: PFMT + MVT and PFMT + manual sham therapy (MST). Participants were women over 18 years of age with complaint or diagnosis of UI symptoms. The primary outcome was the severity of UI symptoms, assessed by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form. The secondary outcomes measures included the vaginal resting pressure and the maximum voluntary contraction of PFM assessed by digital manometry. Results Fifty-two incontinent women participated in the study. There was no significant difference between groups in UI symptoms (F (1.74, 86.9) = 0.406; p = 0.638), vaginal resting pressure (mean difference -1.5 cmH₂0 [95% confidence interval [CI] -4.5 to 1.5; p = 0.33]), and maximum voluntary contraction of PFM (median 0.0 cmH₂0 [25%-75% interquartile range 0.0-5.6; p = 0.12]) after the intervention period. Conclusions Combining MVT with PFMT was not more effective than PFMT alone in reducing UI symptoms, in change vaginal resting pressure and maximum voluntary contraction of PFM. Due to the limitations of the study, further investigations are still needed to confirm these findings.

Aim To verify which one improves better stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms: abdominal hypopressive technique (AHT) or pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT). Methods Randomized controlled trial. Women with SUI who had not participated of physiotherapy program before were invited. The outcome measures were 7-day bladder diary, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and pelvic floor muscles (PFM) function measured by Modified Oxford grading System with vaginal palpation and manometry with Peritron. Intervention consisted by 12 weeks of exercises program including PFMT or AHT program, in groups of maximum three women, twice a week, with physiotherapist supervision. Results AHT and PFMT groups reduced urinary leakage episodes in 7 days, -0.64 and -1.91, respectively, but PFMT was superior, whit mean difference -1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.92 to -0,62) and effect size was 0.94 in favor to PFMT. Regarding to total score of ICIQ-SF, both groups improved, with mean difference between groups -4.7 (95% CI: -6.90 to -2.50) and effect size was 1.04 in favor to PFMT. Manometry also presented improvement after treatment for both groups with mean difference between them of 11 (95% CI: 6.33-15.67) and effect size was 1.15 also in favor to PFMT. Conclusion Regarding to SUI symptoms, quality of life impact and PFM function both groups presented improvement, however, PFMT was superior to AHT among all of them.