Search

Background: Acute pancreatitis can be difficult to diagnose. We developed a rapid dipstick screening test for pancreatitis, based on the immunochromatographic measurement of urinary trypsinogen-2., Methods: We prospectively compared the urinary trypsinogen-2 dipstick test with a quantitative urinary trypsinogen-2 assay, a urinary dipstick test for amylase, and serum and urinary amylase assays in 500 consecutive patients with acute abdominal pain at two emergency departments. Acute pancreatitis was diagnosed according to standardized criteria., Results: The urinary trypsinogen-2 dipstick test was positive in 50 of the 53 patients with acute pancreatitis (sensitivity, 94 percent), including all 7 with severe pancreatitis. Two patients with urinary trypsinogen-2 concentrations below the sensitivity threshold of the test (50 ng per milliliter) and one with a very high concentration had false negative results. The test was also positive in 21 of the 447 patients without pancreatitis (specificity, 95 percent), including 7 with abdominal cancers, 3 with cholangitis, and 2 with chronic pancreatitis. The sensitivity and specificity of the dipstick test were similar to those of the quantitative urinary trypsinogen-2 assay and higher than those of the urinary amylase dipstick test. The serum amylase assay had a sensitivity of 85 percent (with a cutoff value of 300 U per liter for the upper reference limit) and a specificity of 91 percent. The sensitivity and specificity of the urinary amylase assay (cutoff value, 2000 U per liter) were 83 and 88 percent, respectively., Conclusions: In patients with acute abdominal pain seen in the emergency department, a negative dipstick test for urinary trypsinogen-2 rules out acute pancreatitis with a high degree of probability. A positive test usually identifies patients in need of further evaluation.

To investigate the role of the colon in increased oxalate absorption, we measured urinary oxalate and fecal fat excretion in 26 patients with gastrointestinal disease. Eight patients with steatorrhea of various causes (Crohn's disease [two], chronic pancreatitis [four], jejunoileal bypass [one] and extrahepatic biliary obstruction [one]) had hyperoxaluria (greater than 45 mg per 24 hours). All these patients had intact colons. In contrast, none of five patients with ileostomies and steatorrhea secondary to ileal resection had hyperoxaluria. Absorption of 14C-oxalate was increased in three patients with steatorrhea and intact colons but not in three patients with steatorrhea and an ileostomy. Thus, the colon is both the site of and required for increased oxalate absorption in enteric hyperoxaluria. The lack of a direct relation between fecal fat excretion and urinary oxalate excretion in the patients with hyperoxaluria and steatorrhea suggests that steatorrhea, although important, is not the only determinant in the pathogenesis of hyperoxaluria.