Search

A great deal of experimental evidence suggests that a wide spectrum of phase transitions occur in a multistage manner via the appearance and subsequent transformation of intermediate metastable states. Such multistage mechanisms cannot be explained within the realm of the classical nucleation framework. Hence, there is a strong need to develop new theoretical tools to explain the occurrence and nature of these ubiquitous intermediate phases. Here we outline a unified and self-consistent theoretical framework to describe both classical and nonclassical nucleation. Our framework provides a detailed explanation of the whole multistage nucleation pathway showing in particular that the pathway involves a single energy barrier and it passes through a dense phase, starting from a low-density initial phase, before reaching the final stable state. Moreover, we demonstrate that the kinetics of matter inside subcritical clusters favors the formation of nucleation clusters with an intermediate density, i.e. nucleation precursors. Remarkably, these nucleation precursors are not associated with a local minimum of the thermodynamic potential, as commonly assumed in previous phenomenological approaches. On the contrary, we find that they emerge due to the competition between thermodynamics and kinetics of cluster formation. Thus, the mechanism uncovered for the formation of intermediate phases can be used to explain recently reported experimental findings in crystallization: up to now such phases were assumed a consequence of some complex energy landscape with multiple energy minima. Using fundamental concepts from kinetics and thermodynamics, we provide a satisfactory explanation for the so-called nonclassical nucleation pathways observed in experiments.

The foundation for any discussion of first order phase transitions is classical nucleation theory (CNT). CNT, developed in the first half of the twentieth century, is based on a number of heuristically plausible assumptions and the majority of theoretical work on nucleation is devoted to refining or extending these ideas. Ideally, one would like to derive CNT from a more fundamental description of nucleation so that its extension, development and refinement could be developed systematically. In this paper, such a development is described based on a previously established (Lutsko 2012 J. Chem. Phys. 136 034509) connection between CNT and fluctuating hydrodynamics. Here, this connection is described without the need for artificial assumptions such as spherical symmetry. The results are illustrated by application to CNT with moving clusters (a long-standing problem in the literature) and the construction of CNT for ellipsoidal clusters.

A great deal of experimental evidence suggests that a wide spectrum of phase transitions occur in a multistage manner via the appearance and subsequent transformation of intermediate metastable states. Such multistage mechanisms cannot be explained within the realm of the classical nucleation framework. Hence, there is a strong need to develop new theoretical tools to explain the occurrence and nature of these ubiquitous intermediate phases. Here we outline a unified and self-consistent theoretical framework to describe both classical and nonclassical nucleation. Our framework provides a detailed explanation of the whole multistage nucleation pathway showing in particular that the pathway involves a single energy barrier and it passes through a dense phase, starting from a low-density initial phase, before reaching the final stable state. Moreover, we demonstrate that the kinetics of matter inside subcritical clusters favors the formation of nucleation clusters with an intermediate density, i.e. nucleation precursors. Remarkably, these nucleation precursors are not associated with a local minimum of the thermodynamic potential, as commonly assumed in previous phenomenological approaches. On the contrary, we find that they emerge due to the competition between thermodynamics and kinetics of cluster formation. Thus, the mechanism uncovered for the formation of intermediate phases can be used to explain recently reported experimental findings in crystallization: up to now such phases were assumed a consequence of some complex energy landscape with multiple energy minima. Using fundamental concepts from kinetics and thermodynamics, we provide a satisfactory explanation for the so-called nonclassical nucleation pathways observed in experiments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]