Search

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of ruptured aneurysm on morbidity and mortality in patients with ischemic colitis (IC) and resection following infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) surgery., Methods: Between January 2012 and December 2016, patients who underwent resection for ischemic colitis in our clinic were retrospectively reviewed. Data on the ruptured condition of the aneurysm, the emergency or elective form of aneurysm surgery, treatment method for the aneurysm (EVAR-open) were obtained. The patients were compared and divided into two groups as those with ruptured aneurysm and those without., Results: A total of 275 infrarenal AAA cases were treated by the cardiovascular surgery clinic between January 2012 and December 2016. Fourteen patients (5%) developed ischemic colitis requiring resection. Four (1.8%) patients with EVAR and 10 (17.5%) patients with open surgery were operated because of IC. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of demographic data and surgical procedures. The intergroup comparison did not reveal any statistically significant difference among gastrointestinal (GIS) symptoms, the time period until surgery, the involved colon segment, and the surgical procedures performed. The mortality rate in ruptured AAA group was 83.3%, while it was 62.5% in the non-ruptured AAA group. In spite of the fact that the mortality rate was high in the ruptured group, it was not statistically significant (p=0.393)., Conclusion: IC is a complication of AAA surgery with a high mortality rate. Rupture in abdominal aortic aneurysm increasing mortality in IC patients. This complication with a high mortality rate following open AAA surgery should be noted by surgeons and we believe that the liberal utilization of laparotomy and early intervention in suspected cases will decrease mortality rates., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Objective: Cancers of the proximal colon are often diagnosed in advanced stages with iron deficiency anemia and nonspecific symptoms. Aspirin and clopidogrel are commonly used antiaggregant agents for various clinical conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of antiaggregant medication on the early diagnosis of proximal colon cancer., Methods: Cases of colon cancer patients who had received curative surgical procedures between January 1, 2013 and July 31, 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical and pathological results of patients who had used antiaggregant drugs were compared to those who had not., Results: During the studied period, 246 colorectal cancer patients underwent curative surgical procedures. Of the 67 patients with proximal colon cancer who were included in the study, 27 (40.3%) had taken antiaggregant medication. The mean age of the antiaggregant group was 67.1 years (range: 34-88 years), while it was 58.3 years (range: 34-83 years) for the non-antiaggregant group; the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (p=0.03). A pathological evaluation revealed that 74.1% of the antiaggregant group was in the early stages (Stage I/II: 7/13), while 42.5% of the non-antiaggregant group was in the early stages (Stage I/II: 2/15); the difference was statistically significant (p=0.011)., Conclusion: Antiaggregant medication has a positive effect on diagnosing proximal colon cancer at early stages. Patients using aspirin or clopidogrel should undergo a complete colonoscopic evaluation in the presence of gastrointestinal tract bleeding or newly developed anemia., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: None declared.