1. [ 11 C]Erlotinib PET cannot detect acquired erlotinib resistance in NSCLC tumor xenografts in mice
- Author
-
Michael Sauberer, Claudia Kuntner, Thomas Filip, Walter Berger, Severin Mairinger, Thomas Wanek, Taraneh Beikbaghban, Alexander Traxl, Oliver Langer, Christine Pirker, Kushtrim Kryeziu, and Johann Stanek
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,03 medical and health sciences ,T790M ,0302 clinical medicine ,In vivo ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,heterocyclic compounds ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Epidermal growth factor receptor ,neoplasms ,biology ,business.industry ,In vitro ,respiratory tract diseases ,030104 developmental biology ,Epidermoid carcinoma ,Cell culture ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Cancer cell ,biology.protein ,Molecular Medicine ,Erlotinib ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Introduction [ 11 C]Erlotinib PET has shown promise to distinguish non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors harboring the activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation delE746-A750 from tumors with wild-type EGFR. To assess the suitability of [ 11 C]erlotinib PET to detect the emergence of acquired erlotinib resistance in initially erlotinib-responsive tumors, we performed in vitro binding and PET experiments in mice bearing tumor xenografts using a range of different cancer cells, which were erlotinib-sensitive or exhibited clinically relevant resistance mechanisms to erlotinib. Methods The following cell lines were used for in vitro binding and PET experiments: the epidermoid carcinoma cell line A-431 (erlotinib-sensitive, wild-type EGFR) and the three NSCLC cell lines HCC827 (erlotinib-sensitive, delE746-A750), HCC827 EPR (erlotinib-resistant, delE746-A750 and T790M) and HCC827 ERLO (erlotinib-resistant, delE746-A750 and MET amplification). BALB/c nude mice with subcutaneous tumor xenografts underwent two consecutive [ 11 C]erlotinib PET scans, a baseline scan and a second scan in which unlabeled erlotinib (10mg/kg) was co-injected. Logan graphical analysis was used to estimate total distribution volume (V T ) of [ 11 C]erlotinib in tumors. Results In vitro experiments revealed significantly higher uptake of [ 11 C]erlotinib (5.2-fold) in the three NSCLC cell lines as compared to A-431 cells. In all four cell lines co-incubation with unlabeled erlotinib (1μM) led to significant reductions in [ 11 C]erlotinib uptake (−19% to −66%). In both PET scans and for all four studied cell lines there were no significant differences in tumoral [ 11 C]erlotinib V T values. For all three NSCLC cell lines, but not for the A-431 cell line, tumoral V T was significantly reduced following co-injection of unlabeled erlotinib (−20% to −35%). Conclusions We found no significant differences in the in vitro and in vivo binding of [ 11 C]erlotinib between erlotinib-sensitive and erlotinib-resistant NSCLC cells. Our findings suggest that [ 11 C]erlotinib PET will not be suitable to distinguish erlotinib-sensitive NSCLC tumors from tumors with acquired resistance to erlotinib.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF