Search

Purpose Obesity increases the risk of incident chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is one of the strongest risk factors for new-onset CKD even in the absence of metabolic risk factors. Weight loss has been shown to reduce renal hyperfiltration and proteinuria. Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) remains an effective treatment for obesity and its metabolic-related complications. However, literature on its impact on renal function remains limited. Materials and methods This was an observational retrospective study in a tertiary centre in Singapore. MBS cases performed at the centre between 2008 and 2019 were included. The primary outcome measures were estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), calculated using the CKD epidemiology collaboration equation, and albuminuria (defined as urine albumin-creatinine ratio (uACR) > 3.5 mg/mmol) at baseline and 1-year post-MBS. Results Five hundred fifty-seven patients were included. One-year post-MBS, median eGFR increased from 110.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 92.4 to 121.5) to 112.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 97.3 to 122.3), p Conclusions MBS had a positive impact on renal function with modest but statistically significant improvement in eGFR and reduction in albuminuria at 1-year post-surgery. Longer-term data is required to investigate the durability of this impact.

Following bariatric surgery, accurate charting of weight loss and regain is crucial. Various preoperative factors affect postoperative weight loss, including age, sex, ethnicity, and surgical type. These are not considered by current weight loss metrics, limiting comparison of weight loss outcomes between patients or centers and across time. Patients (n=1022) who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (n=809) and gastric bypass (n=213) from 2008 to 2020 in a single center were reviewed. Weight loss outcomes (% total weight loss) were measured for 60 months postoperatively. Longitudinal centile lines were plotted using the post-estimation predictions of quantile regression models, adjusted for type of procedure, sex, ethnicity, and baseline BMI. Median regression showed that %TWL was 1.0% greater among males than females (β = +1.1, 95% CI: +0.6 to +1.7, P =

Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBT) has emerged as an effective treatment in the management of the patient with obesity. Unfortunately, most procedures involve only the restriction of gastric volume without altering the underlying metabolism. The objective of this study was to investigate the practicability and limitations of the metabolic altering procedures: "One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB)" with "natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)" on human cadavers.We performed OAGB with NOTES approach in 3 human cadavers. The steps of the procedure can be divided as follows: step 1, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG); step 2, trans-gastric access to peritoneal cavity; step 3, identification of suitable loop of jejunum; step 4, introduction of the jejunal loop into the stomach; step 5, creation of the gastro-jejunostomy with lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS); step 6, gastric pylorus occlusion with overstitch.We performed OAGB with NOTES in 3 human cadavers with bypassed bilio-pancreatic limb of 55, 75, and 105 cm from the pylorus. The average weight for the cadavers was 64.9 kg (61.2-71.7 kg). The mean procedure time was 157 min. The optimal bypassed length for the procedure was 105 cm.This study has provided proof-of-principle in a pre-clinical cadaveric model that NOTES approach can be used to perform OAGB and, therefore, merits additional evaluation and consideration in surviving porcine model.

The adverse implications of obesity extend beyond physical health to include negative impact on quality of life (QoL), mood, and eating habits. While bariatric surgery provides successful weight loss and metabolic benefits, studies describe conflicting results on QoL and mood-related outcomes. Patients (n = 140) with class II/III obesity and T2DM were recruited from 2015 to 2019, and stratified based on medical or surgical treatment. Questionnaires including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Euro QoL visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), and Revised 21-item Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R21) were recorded at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after treatment. At baseline, the surgical group (n = 55) and medical group (n = 85) had no significant difference in questionnaire outcomes. At 6 and 12 months, EQ-VAS was higher in the surgical group (12 months surgical 82.00 ± 12.64, medical 72.81 ± 16.56, p = 0.001), with greater improvement from baseline. HADS-D scores at 12 months were lower in the surgical group (surgical 2.60 ± 2.88, medical 3.90 ± 3.58, p = 0.025). At 12 months, the surgical group also had better TFEQ-R21 scores, with higher cognitive restraint scores (surgical 19.09 ± 3.00, medical 16.69 ± 3.61, p

Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the preferred bariatric procedure in many countries. However, there is one shortcoming of LSG in the long-term follow-up, and this is the onset of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and erosive esophagitis (EE). Conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered an option in patients unresponsive to medical therapy. Currently, there is no evidence of EE improvement or resolution after conversion surgery. In this study, we objectively evaluate the effectiveness of RYGB in management of EE with upper endoscopy (EGD) to identify the significant variables in patients with GERD symptoms post LSG refractory to medical therapy and require conversion surgery. Methods Over a period of 11 years (2008–2019) at Singapore General Hospital, we retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of a cohort of patients whom had conversion surgery to RYGB for refractory GERD and EE after LSG. Patient’s endoscopic findings and demographic and anthropometric data were analyzed. Results We identified a total of 14 patients who underwent LSG to RYGB conversions for endoscopic proven erosive esophagitis in our unit during the study period. Eight patients (57.1%) had concurrent hiatal hernia repaired. Nine (64.3%) patients were females. The median age of patients in this cohort was 44 (range 30–61) years. Mean weight and BMI were 87.7 kg (± 19.2) and 32.8 (± 3.09) kg/m2, respectively, on the day of conversion surgery. The median time between LSG and revision to RYGB was 36 (range 6–68) months. Seven patients (50%) had complete resolution of GERD symptoms after conversion, and 6 patients (42.9%) had partial resolution. Six out of 7 patients had complete resolution of EE. There were 4 anastomotic strictures (28.6%). Older patients, Indian ethnicity, present of hiatal hernia and lower weight loss after initial LSG were more likely to undergo conversion surgery. Conclusion Conversion to RYGB after LSG is clinically relevant and may be a feasible solution if patients have ongoing GERD refractory to medical therapy. Ninety-three percent of our patients achieved complete resolution of their GERD symptoms and significant improvement of erosive esophagitis with significant weight loss after conversion. This study has important implications as LSG is increasingly being performed and a proportion of these will need revision surgery for various reasons, particularly GERD which is extremely prevalent.

Following bariatric surgery, accurate charting of weight loss and regain is crucial. Various preoperative factors affect postoperative weight loss, including age, sex, ethnicity, and surgical type. These are not considered by current weight loss metrics, limiting comparison of weight loss outcomes between patients or centers and across time.Patients (n=1022) who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (n=809) and gastric bypass (n=213) from 2008 to 2020 in a single center were reviewed. Weight loss outcomes (% total weight loss) were measured for 60 months postoperatively. Longitudinal centile lines were plotted using the post-estimation predictions of quantile regression models, adjusted for type of procedure, sex, ethnicity, and baseline BMI.Median regression showed that %TWL was 1.0% greater among males than females (β = +1.1, 95% CI: +0.6 to +1.7, P =0.0001). Participants who underwent SG had less %TWL compared to GB (β = -1.3, 95% CI: -1.9 to -0.8, P0.0001). There was a trend towards less %TWL among the Indian and Malay participants compared to Chinese. Age and diabetes were not significant predictors. Reference centile charts were produced for the overall cohort, as well as specific charts adjusted for type of bariatric procedure, sex, ethnicity, and baseline BMI.Centile charts provide a clinically relevant method for monitoring of weight trajectories postoperatively and aid in realistic and personalised goal setting, and the early identification of "poor responders". This is the first study to present post-bariatric surgery centile charts for an Asian cohort.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the preferred bariatric procedure in many countries. However, there is one shortcoming of LSG in the long-term follow-up and this is the onset of GERD and erosive esophagitis (EE). Current evidence of the effect of SG on GERD did not consolidate to a consensus. In this study, we objectively evaluate the incidence of EE 1 year post-LSG with upper endoscopy (EGD) and try to identify the significant variables and possible underlying mechanisms of the EE post-LSG. Over a period of 5 years (2011–2016) at Singapore General Hospital, we retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of a cohort of patients whom had LSG by a single surgeon who routinely performed EGD pre-operative and 1 year post-operative to assess EE and hiatal hernia. Patient’s endoscopic findings and demographic and anthropometric data were analyzed. We identified a total of 97 obese patients who underwent LSG at our hospital by studied surgeon. Sixty-three patients (64.9% of original sample) were finally evaluated in the present study, 40 (59.7%) of whom were female. The mean (range) age of patients was 38.2 (18–66) years, and mean BMI was 36.3 ± 4.1 kg/m2. Median time to follow-up EGD was 13 months (range, 12–15). Following LSG, there was a significant decrease in both BMI (42.1 ± 1.2 vs. 29.9 ± 1.0 kg/m2) and percentage excess weight loss of 56.6 ± 3.6%. The prevalence of EE on endoscopy increased from 9 (14.3%) to 28 (44.4%) patients. Of which 15 (23.8%) were grade A, 11 (17.5%) were grade B, and 2 (3.2%) were grade C. There was no correlation between GERD symptoms with EE; however, our study found a trend suggesting higher prevalence of EE with a sleeve diameter measuring > 2 cm wide (p = 0.069). Although LSG is effective in treating obesity and its metabolic syndromes, the prevalence of EE increased significantly 1 year after the surgery. Since we do not fully understand the long-term impact of chronic esophagitis in post-sleeve population, we recommend follow-up EGD assessment post-operatively and treat the esophagitis if present.

Traditionally, restoration of normal bowel continuity after resection and bypass of a diseased or obstructed gastrointestinal tract can only be achieved through surgery, which can be technically challenging and comes with a risk of adverse events. Here, we describe our institutions’ experience with endoscopic-guided gastroenterostomy or enteroenterostomy with lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) from March 2015 to August 2016. Ten patients had gastrogastrostomy (gastric pouch to gastric remnant) and three patients had jejunogastrostomy (Roux limb to gastric remnant) for the reversal of Roux-en-Y bariatric surgery. One patient had gastroduodenostomy (stomach to duodenal bulb) post antrectomy and one patient had jejunojejunostomy for distal obstruction following Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Technical and clinical success were achieved in all patients, save for delayed anastomotic stenosis following stent removal in one patient, with a mean follow-up of 126 days (3–318 days) with minimal complications in two patients. Endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis therefore may be a safe and feasible technique to re-establish continuity of the digestive system following bypass in the short-term.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is thought to be a cause of chronic abdominal pain post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and current practice of performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with or without sphincterotomy is not supported by evidence. In addition to the complexity and risks of the procedure in patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy, the outcomes are uncertain and debatable. We performed a retrospective review and analysis of post-gastric bypass patients who had undergone ERCP with sphincterotomy to determine the effectiveness in patients with suspected SOD. Over a period of 5 years at the University of Minnesota, we retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of a cohort of patients whom had a previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and whom had a subsequent ERCP for suspected SOD. Patients were categorized by modified Milwaukee classification, and outcomes were evaluated by patients’ self-reporting of symptoms at follow-up. We identified 50 patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted gastrostomy for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass over the study period. Within this group, 35 patients (70%) were suspected to have SOD. Nine patients (25.7%) were classified as type I, 19 patients (54.3%) type II, and seven patients (20%) type III. Thirty-four patients (97.1%) had biliary sphincterotomy, and 17 patients (48.6%) had both biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomy. Fourteen (40%) had repeated ERCP. At median follow-up of 11.5 months, type I SOD had two responders (25%), type II had nine responders (52.9%), and type III had one responder (14.3%). A subgroup analysis did not show significant differences in improvement of symptoms between patients whom had single versus repeated ERCP or biliary sphincterotomy alone versus both biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomy. Three patients (9%) had post-ERCP pancreatitis. SOD in patients post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is complex due to multiple confounding factors. Rome III and Milwaukee classification systems assist us in the diagnosis and treatment of sphincter dysfunction until we have a better way to predict treatment response post sphincterotomy. Current treatment is based on the type of disorder and anatomy of biliary ducts. Types I and II sphincter dysfunction particularly associated with dilated biliary duct on imaging have the best response to endoscopic sphincterotomy and therefore should be considered taking into account the risks and benefit. Repeated sphincterotomy and concurrent pancreatic sphincterotomy is generally not useful.

Although vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is no longer performed in the USA, due to its popularity in 1980s, many patients still possess this anatomy with its inherent complications. The stomal stenosis secondary to tight ring or mesh is traditionally treated with surgical removal of the silastic ring or a complex revision, which was hampered by complications, technical complexity, and invasiveness. We described our experience of endoscopic management of this complex problem and the early outcomes. Retrospective study. Tertiary care center. Thirteen consecutive patients with gastric outlet obstruction who underwent endoscopic intervention after vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG). Endoscopic removal of silastic ring with self-expanding metal stent or endoscopic guided trans-gastric stapled stricturoplasty (TSS). Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endoscopic approaches. Technical and clinical success in 11 patients (85 %) on first endoscopic attempt. Stent migrated in one patient, and another patient required second endoscopic intervention for recurring symptoms. Retrospective analysis, single-institution study, and small sample size. Endoscopic approach to gastric outlet obstruction secondary to VBG regardless of type of restrictive device is safe and feasible with possible short-term benefit. This technique may also be use as bridge toward future revision surgery.