Search

This study aims to compare different types of metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) with lifestyle intervention/medical therapy (LSI/MT) for the treatment of overweight/obesity. The present and network meta-analysis (NMA) includes randomized trials. MBS was associated with a reduction of BMI, body weight, and percent weight loss, when compared to LSI/MT, and also with a significant reduction of HbA1c and a higher remission of diabetes. Meta-regression analyses revealed that BMI, a higher proportion of women, and a longer duration of trial were associated with greater effects of MBS. The NMA showed that all surgical procedures included (except greater curvature plication) were associated with a reduction of BMI. MBS is an effective option for the treatment of obesity. The choice of BMI thresholds for eligibility for surgery of patients with different complications should be performed making an evaluation of risks and benefits in each BMI category. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Efficacy and safety of OAGB/MGB (one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass) have been well documented both as primary and as revisional procedures. However, even after OAGB/MGB, revisional surgery is unavoidable in patients with surgical complications or insufficient weight loss. Methods: A questionnaire asking for the total number and demographics of primary and revisional OAGB/MGBs performed between January 2006 and July 2020 was e-mailed to all S.I.C. OB centres of excellence (annual caseload > 100; 5-year follow-up > 50%). Each bariatric centre was asked to provide gender, age, preoperative body mass index (BMI) and obesity-related comorbidities, previous history of abdominal or bariatric surgery, indication for surgical revision of OAGB/MGB, type of revisional procedure, pre- and post-revisional BMI, peri- and post-operative complications, last follow-up (FU). Results: Twenty-three bariatric centres (54.8%) responded to our survey reporting a total number of 8676 primary OAGB/MGBS and a follow-up of 62.42 ± 52.22 months. A total of 181 (2.08%) patients underwent revisional surgery: 82 (0.94%) were suffering from intractable DGER (duodeno-gastric-esophageal reflux), 42 (0.48%) were reoperated for weight regain, 16 (0.18%) had excessive weight loss and malnutrition, 12 (0.13%) had a marginal ulcer perforation, 10 (0.11%) had a gastro-gastric fistula, 20 (0.23%) had other causes of revision. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) was the most performed revisional procedure (109; 54%), followed by bilio-pancreatic limb elongation (19; 9.4%) and normal anatomy restoration (19; 9.4%). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that there is acceptable revisional rate after OAGB/MGB and conversion to RYGB represents the most frequent choice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become a widespread treatment option in patients affected by severe obesity. However, studies investigating the impact of the subsequent weight loss on the ventilatory response at rest and during physical exercise are lacking. Methods: This is an observational study on 46 patients with severe obesity (76% females), comparing parameters of ventilatory function 1 month before and 6 months after SG. Patients were first evaluated by resting spirometry and subsequently with an incremental, maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on treadmill. Results: The important weight loss of 26.35 ± 6.17% of body weight (BMI from 43.59 ± 5.30 to 32.27 ± 4.84 kg/m2) after SG was associated with a significant improvement in lung volumes and flows during forced expiration at rest, while resting ventilation and tidal volume were reduced (all p ≤ 0.001). CPET revealed decreased ventilation during incremental exercise (p < 0.001), with a less shallow ventilatory pattern shown by a lower increase of breathing frequency (∆BFrest to ATp = 0.028) and a larger response of tidal volume (∆TVAT to Peakp < 0.001). Furthermore, a concomitant improvement of the calculated dead space ventilation, VE/VCO2 slope and peripheral oxygen saturation was shown (all p ≤ 0.002). Additionally, the increased breathing reserve at peak exercise was associated with a lower absolute oxygen consumption but improved exercise capacity and tolerance (all p < 0.001). Conclusion: The weight loss induced by SG led to less burdensome restrictive limitations of the respiratory system and to a reduction of ventilation at rest and during exercise, possibly explained by an increased ventilatory efficiency and a decrease in oxygen demands. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Monitoring depth of anesthesia may improve anesthetic dosing and postanesthetic recovery in obese patients. Sixty morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric bandage (LAGB) were randomly assigned to receive anesthesia with sevoflurane titrated by either standard clinical parameters (SCP) (target = baseline hemodynamic parameters ± 20%) or by A-line ARX index (AAI) (target = 20 ± 5). Heart rate, arterial blood pressure, inspiratory and expiratory gas concentrations, and AAI were recorded in all patients at 5-min intervals, but AAI was made available only to the anesthesiologist assigned to AAI-monitored patients. Emergence times in surgery room and recovery times in postanesthesia care unit (PACU) were recorded at 1- and 30-min intervals. Mean intraoperative values of AAI were higher in AAI-monitored than in SCP-monitored patients (22.5 vs 15.0, p = 0.001). Compared to SCP monitoring, AAI monitoring reduced consumption of sevoflurane by 20% ( p = 0.014), times to eye opening by 2.4 min ( p = 0.001) and to extubation by 2.5 min ( p = 0.009) and to achieve SpO 92% in room air by 17 min ( p = 0.001). Aldrete scores were higher in AAI- than in SCP-monitored patients at arrival in PACU ( p = 0.035), but Aldrete scores ≥9 were attained in similar times. AAI monitoring can improve titration of and recovery from sevoflurane for LAGB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is now considered an effective bariatric procedure (American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery statement). We attempted to assess the size of the gastric fundus remaining after LSG and gastric voiding rate (fast/slow) by radiological upper gastrointestinal series (UGS) with a water-soluble contrast medium (CM). The findings were compared with weight loss data. Methods: Seventy-four obese patients underwent LSG. Radiological UGS were used to measure the remaining fundus size in 28 of 74 patients 24-72 h after the procedure, with the aid of Matlab software and a library image processing toolbox (MathWorks®). Sleeve voiding was measured in 57 of 74 patients, based on the patients' radiological reports. Results: The mean volume of the remaining fundus was 17.56 ml (range 1.00-77.03 ml). The mean percent excess BMI loss (%EBL) was 39.5%, 53.7%, and 60.8%, respectively, 3, 6, and 12 months after LSG. Sleeve voiding was fast in 49 of 57 patients (85.96%) and slow in eight (14.03%). Conclusions: No correlation was found between the estimated volume of the remaining gastric fundus and weight loss (%EBL) after LSG. Patients showing a rapid gastroduodenal transit of the CM achieved a better weight loss than patients with a slow voiding rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Late band slippage has occurred in nearly 3–10% of patients after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) with an average delay of 13 months. Band slippage can rarely lead to necrosis of the enlarged pouch, a potentially life-threatening condition. We report a female (BMI 39.92 with co-morbidities) who developed acute outlet obstruction 2 years after LAGB placement. After prompt band deflation, an urgent Gastrografin® swallow showed stomach slippage without emptying. At re-operation pouch strangulation was discovered. The pouch appeared to be ill-fated, but as no tear was evident on intra-operative assessment, we decided to simply remove the band and drain. The patient was successfully discharged after 8 days, and the last upper endoscopy showed only a large ulcer in the fundus that was healing. Proper and prompt management of symptomatic patients with stomach slippage, with early operation when acute obstruction is evident, can enable a successful stomach-sparing approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]