Search

Yes-associated protein (YAP) positivity indicates a poor prognosis in gastric cancer. Transcriptional co-activator with a PDZ-binding domain (TAZ), a YAP paralog, is highly expressed in gastric signet ring cell carcinoma. Verteporfin (VP), a clinical photosensitizer, was recently shown to inhibit YAP/TAZ. In the present study, the therapeutic potential of VP treatment was explored using two gastric cancer cell lines: MKN-45 (TAZ-dominant) and MKN-74 (YAP-dominant). Cell proliferation was evaluated by MTS assay. Vascular mimicry was evaluated by the tube formation assay. Gene and protein expression levels of YAP/TAZ downstream effectors [such as Survivin, Cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (CYR61), and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF)] were measured. YAP or TAZ localization was evaluated by immunofluorescence. Cell death was assessed by immunofluorescent staining of Annexin V. YAP and TAZ expression were knocked down by small interfering RNA. The current results demonstrate that MKN-45, a poorly differentiated TAZ-dominant gastric cancer cell line, was more sensitive to VP than MKN-74, a moderately differentiated YAP-dominant gastric cancer cell line. VP changed the localization of YAP/TAZ, promoted its degradation and significantly decreased the protein level of Survivin in both cell lines. Cell death was induced by VP treatment in a dose-dependent manner. Vascular mimicry was inhibited in both cell lines. Proliferation in both cell lines decreased in response to YAP/TAZ knockdown. The present study indicated that VP has potential as a therapeutic agent in YAP- and TAZ-dominant gastric cancers due to its ability to suppress the anti-apoptotic protein Survivin via inhibition of YAP and TAZ.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a therapeutic method used to destroy tumor tissue via reactive oxygen. Notably, reactive oxygen is induced by a combination of photosensitizers, including talaporfin sodium (TS) and laser light. Gastric cancer cell lines, MKN45 and MKN74, were used to evaluate the effect of TS-PDT in vitro. The antitumor effect of TS-PDT, which was evaluated via cellular viability assay, on MKN74 was weaker than that on MKN45 cells, suggesting that MKN74 cell could be resistant to TS-PDT. However, using a higher TS concentration or setting a longer treatment time (24 h) resulted in effective TS-PDT treatment on MKN74 cells. In addition, when irradiation power of LED was raised up to 5.06 J/cm2, TS-PDT was able to induce an antitumor effect on MKN74 cells. This suggested that the difference in TS-PDT efficacy between MKN45 and MKN74 cells is based on the difference in cellular uptake of TS. As expected, uptake of TS by MKN74 cells was lower than that by MKN45 cells. The expression levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor in MKN74 cells were lower than those in MKN45 cells. With GW3965 treatment, an agonist/activator of Liver X Receptor, LDL receptor expression was reduced, weakening the TS-PDT effect. Furthermore, as a hydroxymethylglutaryl-Coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, treatment using simvastatin increased LDL receptor expression, leading to enhancement of the TS-PDT effect on MKN74 cells. In conclusion, the difference in LDL receptor expression between the two gastric cell lines could influence TS-PDT efficacy; simvastatin may enhance the antitumor effect of TS-PDT through upregulating the LDL receptor even on PDT-resistant gastric cancer cells.