Search

Objective: Stabilization of metastatic acetabular defects with a bone cement-augmented revision support cup for remobilization of oncological patients in advanced cancer stages., Indications: Metastatic acetabular defects (Metastatic Acetabular Classification, MAC 2-4) in patients with a prognostic medium or long-term survival., Contraindications: Highly limited survival due to metastatic disease (< 6 weeks). Local bone or soft tissue infection. Primary bone tumor with curative treatment option. Advanced pelvic discontinuity. Recent wound compromising systemic therapy., Surgical Technique: Standard hip approach. Curettage of the metastatic defect and careful reaming of the acetabulum before insertion of the cup. Predrilling of the dome und flange screws before application of the bone cement through the center hole of the implant and filling of the acetabular defect. Complete insertion of the screws for compound osteosynthesis. Implant of a modular inlay or dual mobility system., Postoperative Management: Full weight bearing or mobilization with two crutches according to the level of pain. Adjuvant local radiation therapy after wound consolidation. Continuation of systemic therapy according to tumor board decision., Results: Between 2012 and 2019, we treated 14 patients with metastatic acetabular defects using the modular revision support cup "MRS-TITAN® Comfort", MRS-C, Peter Brehm GmbH, Weisendorf, Germany) at our institution. Mean Harris Hip Score improvement was 23.2 with a mean patient's survival of 9.7 months due to the reduced cancer-related prognosis; 13 of the 14 implants endured the patient's prognosis. One implant had to be removed due soft tissue defect-related periprosthetic joint infection., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The planning and implantation of a customized partial pelvis replacement places high demands on both the surgeon and the entire team (engineer, assistants, surgical team). Thanks to careful preoperative planning and meticulous perioperative execution, customized partial pelvic replacement represents a complex but reliable procedure for defect reconstruction even with highly complex acetabular bone defects or after multiple previous surgeries., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: Treatment of chronic periprosthetic joint infection of the knee requires the removal of the implant and thorough debridement, with reimplantation in a second stage surgery. Intramedullary spacers can be helpful during the interval between explantation and reimplantation and provide a temporary arthrodesis which fixes the knee in extension preserving leg length and administers local antibiotic therapy., Indications: Periprosthetic joint infection of the knee with large bony defects and severe infection of the native joint with advanced destruction/infiltration of the cartilage and bone and/or ligament insufficiency., Contraindications: Suspected antibiotic resistance of the microbiological pathogen to local antibiotic drugs, incompliant patient, and known allergy to bone cement or antibiotic., Surgical Technique: After implant removal, suitable metal rods are coated with antibiotic-loaded bone cement and inserted into the cleaned intramedullary canals of femur and tibia. Rods are joined at the joint line with a connector and joint space is filled with more bone cement to achieve temporary and very stable arthrodesis., Postoperative Management: Partial weight-bearing and no flexion/extension while spacer is in place; second stage reimplantation as soon as infection is controlled., Results: Complications related to the spacer were rare (5.3%). Reimplantation of an implant was possible in 95 of 113 patients (84%), of those, 23 (20%) received an arthrodesis. Of the 95 patients that were reimplanted, 14 showed signs of recurrent infection. Mean time to last follow-up was 15.6 months post reimplantation. Mean knee pain was 2.9/10; overall function was good; 6 patients had an extension lag; mean total range of motion was 88°., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection remains a common and serious complication after hip arthroplasty. To improve function and patient comfort after joint removal in two-stage revision, commercially manufactured spacers for the hip joint allow retention of the anatomical joint geometry thereby limiting soft tissue contraction and allow mobilization., Indications: Periprosthetic joint infection of the hip, septic arthritis with severe destruction of the hip cartilage and/or bone requiring arthroplasty., Contraindications: Allergies to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or antibiotics, severe hip dysplasia with insufficient cranial support, incompliant patient, large osseous defect of the acetabulum, insufficient metaphyseal/diaphyseal support of the femoral bone, resistance of the microbiological pathogen to spacer-inert antibiotic medication, inability to perform primary wound closure requiring temporary open-wound therapy., Surgical Technique: Preoperative templating on radiograph; removal of joint prosthesis and thorough debridement with removal of all foreign material; trial spacer selection and insertion and trial reduction of the joint, fixing the spacer with PMMA to the proximal femur, final reduction, radiograph and stability test., Results: Data were analyzed from patients treated between 2016 and 2021. In all, 20 patients were treated with preformed spacers and 16 with custom-made spacers. Pathogens were detected in 23 of the 36 cases (64%). Polymicrobial infections were present in 8 of 36 cases (22%). In patients who received preformed spacers, there were 6 cases of spacer-related complications (30%). Of the 36 patients (83%), 30 were reimplanted with a new implant; 3 patients died due to septic or other complications before reimplantation (8%). Average follow-up was 20.2 months after reimplantation. There were no major differences between the two groups of spacers. Patient comfort was not measured., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Objective: Mobile knee spacers can be utilized in the first stage of a two-stage exchange in periprosthetic joint infection or septic arthritis of the knee to prevent soft tissue contraction, enable local antibiotic elution, and improve patient mobility. Commercially made moulds enable the surgeon to prepare a reproducible spacer design and match the preparation of the arthroplasty, which will be carried out in a second step., Indications: Periprosthetic joint infection of the knee and severe cases of septic arthritis of the knee with advanced destruction/infiltration of the cartilage., Contraindications: Antibiotic resistance of the microbiological pathogen to available antibiotic agents, incompliant patient, large osseous defect preventing proper fixation, known allergy to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or antibiotic, severe soft tissue damage with high ligament instability, especially deterioration of extensor mechanism and insufficient patella/quadricep tendon., Surgical Technique: After thorough debridement and removal of all foreign material, cutting blocks are used to shape femur and tibia to the implant design required. Using a silicone mould, PMMA with suitable antibiotics is moulded into the shape of the future implant. After polymerization, the implants are fixed onto the bone with additional PMMA without pressurize for the sake of easy removal., Postoperative Management: Partial weight bearing with no restriction of flexion/extension while spacer is in place; second stage reimplantation as soon as infection is controlled., Results: In all, 22 cases were treated, mostly with a PMMA spacer containing gentamicin and vancomycin. Pathogens were detected in 13 of 22 cases (59%). We observed two complications (9%). Twenty of 22 patients (86%) were reimplanted with a new arthroplasty; 16 of the 20 patients remained revision-free and infection-free at the last follow-up (average time to follow-up 13 months, range 1-46 months). Average range of motion in flexion and extension at follow-up was 98°., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Objective: Implantation of custom-made acetabular components (CMAC) with load transmission onto the remaining bone stock and reconstruction of the "center of rotation" (COR) in cases of severe periacetabular bone defects., Indications: Severe periacetabular bone loss (Paprosky type IIIA/B) with or without pelvic discontinuity after septic or aseptic loosening with inadequate load capacity of the dorsal pillar and/or large supraacetabular defects., Contraindications: Acute or local infections, lack of compliance, taking into account the risks and complications: missing or limited expected postoperative functional gain, multimorbid patients with potential inoperability during the first and/or second intervention., Surgical Technique: Lateral transgluteal or posterolateral approach while protecting neurovascular and muscular structures. Preparation of the implant site based on preoperative planning with augmentation of bone defects as far as possible. Primarily stable anchoring with 2 angle-stable pole screws in the ilium, an optional pole screw in the pubic bone for determination of COR, and stabilization screws in the iliac wing (optionally angle-stable). Use of dual mobility cup according to the soft tissue tension and intraoperative stability., Postoperative Management: For the first 6 weeks postoperative partial weight-bearing (20 kg), followed by a gradual increase of the load (10 kg per week)., Results: Between 2008 and 2018, 47 patients with a Paprosky type III defect underwent implantation of a monoflanged CMAC. Main complication was a periprosthetic joint infection with subsequent need for implant removal in 9 of 10 cases. Harris Hip Score improved from 21.1 to 61.5 points. X‑ray imaging displayed an angle of inclination of 42.3 ± 5.3°, an anteversion of 16.8 ± 6.2°, a ∆ H of 0.5 ± 0.2 mm and a ∆ V of 17.7 ± 1.1 mm according to Roessler et al., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Objective: Restoration of the extensor apparatus in the case of advanced tendon defects as part of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Reconstruction and augmentation using vascularized gastrocnemius muscle and tendon., Indications: Advanced degeneration of the extensor apparatus (patella tendon; quadriceps tendon) with or without discontinuity, following revision arthroplasty., Contraindications: Persistent infection or pending TKA revision. Damaged gastrocnemius or soleus muscle or Achilles tendon., Surgical Technique: Extension of the surgical TKA-access medial-distally. Separation of the medial gastrocnemius muscle along the raphe and preparation of the distal tendon from the soleus portion. Transposition into the defect site, augmentation or reconstruction of the defect by double turn of the gastrocnemius tendon. The muscle belly serves to adequately cover the tendon as well as the ventral knee joint. Mesh coverage of the muscle., Postoperative Management: Immobilization of the knee and ankle for 10 days until mesh graft healing. Stepwise increasing flection of the knee with 30°/60°/90° every 2 weeks. Total weight bearing with secured full extended knee, no weight bearing with flexed knee for 6 weeks., Results: In 9 patients, 3 with complete rupture of the patellar tendon, 5 with destruction of the extensor apparatus, and 1 patient with rupture of the quadriceps tendon following TKA revision, good functional results were achieved with active extension of the knee joint and standing/gait stability 6 months after surgery., (© 2021. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Objective: Restoration of knee function by using tibial metaphyseal components in advanced metaphyseal bone defects after multiple bone-damaging revision surgery on the knee joint., Indications: Advanced tibial metaphyseal bone defects (Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute [AORI] IIb and III defects) in revision arthroplasty of the knee joint., Contraindications: Persistent or current joint infection, general infection (e.g., pneumonia), nonreconstructable insufficient extensor apparatus., Surgical Technique: Standard access including existing skin scars, arthrotomy, removal of cement spacer if necessary and removal of multiple tissue samples; preparation of femur first, followed by preparation of the tibia. Referencing the tibial rotation and joint line height. Tibial osteotomy referenced intramedullarily. Determination of the metaphyseal defect size and choice of component size. Positioning of the rasp guide for the preparation of the metaphyseal component (sleeve); gradual preparation of the bed for the metaphyseal component. Afterwards the prepared component at the desired depth (when using augments +5 or +10 mm accordingly 5 or 10 mm above the tibial plateau) is left and the tibial plateau is fixed on the embedded sleeve. Test coupling, control of the implant position and the height of the joint line radiologically. If satisfactory the definitive implants accordingly to the components of used implants before can be implanted., Postoperative Management: Full weight bearing. Regular wound control; limitation of the degree of flexion only with weakened or reconstructed extensor apparatus., Results: Between May 2018 and August 2019, 14 metaphyseal tibial components were implanted in 14 patients. The mean follow-up was 10.4 months. The follow-up included clinical examination, KSS (Knee Society Score) and an X‑ray and failure analysis. A significant improvement in range of movement from 75 ± 16° to 100 ± 14° (p < 0.01) was achieved. The KSS improved significantly from 78 ± 12 points preoperatively to 137 ± 23 points postoperatively. Two patients complained of persistent pain after exercise (walking distance >200 m) after 6 months; tibial shaft pain was negated by all patients. The group examined afterwards showed an implant survival rate of 100% in the observation interval.

Objective: Optimal reconstruction of acetabular anatomy and primarily stable bridging even of large bone defects in hip revision surgery by intraoperative cementless application of highly modular components of the MRS-TITAN Comfort (MRS-C) system according to the augment-and-modular-cage principle., Indications: Acetabular defect situations in hip revision surgery, hereditary/acquired acetabular deformities, severe secondary hip osteoarthritis., Contraindications: Extended periacetabular defects of the dorsal pillar, pelvic discontinuities, persisting posttraumatic or periprosthetic infections, lack of intraoperative bony anchorage options., Surgical Technique: Conventional positioning. Flexible selection of approach (posterolateral, anterolateral or transgluteal) to the hip joint, if possible using a previous approach. Implant removal, preparation and intraoperative acetabular defect evaluation. Optional impaction bone grafting for biological downsizing. Selection of modular components and augments depending on the defect. Preparation of the obturator foramen for anchorage of the caudal flange. Optional preparation of the os ilium for additional fixation of the cage with flanges. Fixation with polyaxial screws and selection of version/inclination of the cup component. Selection of the inlay (polyethylene/ceramic)., Postoperative Management: Partial weight-bearing with 20 kg body-weight for 6 weeks with crutches. Prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis and heterotopic ossification. Additional adapted antibiotic therapy in cases of infection., Results: A minimum 1‑year follow-up of 42 patients showed significant improvements of Harris Hip Scores (p < 0.0001), adequate reconstruction of the physiologic center of rotation (x-ray controlled in the vertical plane, referenced to the contralateral side), and a clear reduction of preoperative leg length discrepancies. No significant changes in range of motion. No implant-associated complications noted. Based on the short follow-up results, the implant proves as suitable for reconstruction of even large acetabular bone defects.

Objective: Reconstruction of proximal humeral bone defects in the setting of shoulder revision arthroplasty by implantation of a modular humeral component., Indications: Severe segmental humeral bone defects in revision total shoulder arthroplasty, after tumor resection, trauma, pathological fractures, post-infectious or after failed osteosynthesis., Contraindications: Acute or chronic local infections, large diaphyseal bone defects preventing adequate anchorage of the prosthesis, very short life expectancy (<3 months)., Surgical Technique: Removal of the implant using an extended deltopectoral approach. Periarticular arthrolysis with preservation of neurovascular structures. Resection of the meta-diaphyseal bone and reconstruction of the humeral length with the help of different extension sleeves and a modular humeral component. Soft tissue management is crucial, especially with reverse shoulder arthroplasty., Postoperative Management: Three weeks postoperatively immobilization in a shoulder sling, active assisted movement therapy by gradual pain-adapted increase of movement, muscle coordination, and strength., Results: The results of 11 consecutive patients treated with a modular humeral component due to a failed shoulder arthroplasty between 2008 and 2016 were evaluated retrospectively. Mean length of reconstruction was 100 mm. Due to recurrent dislocations one patient required revision and conversion to a reverse component. No cases of aseptic loosening or periprosthetic infection were observed.

Objective: The aim is to stabilize the thoracolumbar spine with a thoracoscopically implanted vertebral body replacement (VBR). To improve intraoperative depth perception and orientation, implantation is performed under three-dimensional (3D) thoracoscopic vision., Indications: Vertebral burst fractures at the thoracolumbar junction (A4 AOSpine classification), pseudarthrosis, and posttraumatic instability with increasing kyphosis., Contraindications: Severe pulmonary dysfunctions, pulmonary or thoracic infections, previous thoracic surgery, and pulmonary adhesions., Surgical Technique: The patient is lying in a right lateral decubitus position. Localization of the fractured vertebra. Minimally invasive transthoracic approach. Perform single lung ventilation and insert the 3D thoracoscope two intercostal spaces above the working portal. Utilization of special binocular glasses for 3D vision of the operation field and secure resection of the fractured vertebra. Measurement of the bony defect and insertion of the expandable cage. Control of correct cage position under fluoroscopy. Insertion of a chest tube and inflate the left lung., Postoperative Management: Chest × ray Remove chest tube when output is <500 ml/24 h Early mobilization on the ward 6 weeks no weight-bearing >5 kg RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2017, 12 patients received a VBR under 3D thoracoscopic vision. After a mean follow up of 26 months, no cage dislocation was noticed and all patients recovered from the initial back pain. Complications were notable in two cases (17%) with a small pneumothorax after removal of the chest tube and postoperative pneumonia in one patient (8%). All responded to conservative treatment. Revision surgery was not necessary.

Objective: To remove loosened prosthesis components, to perform augmentation, to address osseous defects, to perform neutrally aligned ankle arthrodesis, and to achieve postoperative pain relief., Indications: Symptomatic, aseptic loosening of total ankle replacement (TAR) with/without substantial bone defect of the tibial and/or talar bone stock., Contraindications: General surgical or anesthesiological risks, periprosthetic infection, local or systemic infection, nonmanageable soft tissue problems., Surgical Technique: Removal of both prosthesis components using the previous incision (mostly using anterior ankle approach). Careful debridement of bone stock at the tibial and talar side. Osseous augmentation of defects using autologous or homologous cancellous bone, if needed, using structural allografts., Postoperative Management: A soft wound dressing is used. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended. Patient mobilization starts on postoperative day 1 with 15 kg partial weight bearing using a stabilizing walking boot or cast for 6-8 weeks. Following clinical and radiographic follow-up at 6 weeks, full weight bearing is initiated gradually after progressive osseous healing has been confirmed., Results: Between January 2007 and December 2012, ankle arthrodesis was performed in 9 patients with failed TAR (6 men and 3 women, mean age 56.4 ± 7.0 years, range 47.8-66.0 years). The mean time between the initial TAR and revision surgery was 4.5 ± 2.4 years (range 1.2-7.9 years). In one patient irrigation and debridement was performed due to superficial wound infection. Another patient had a delayed osseous healing 11 months after the revision surgery.

Objective: Reconstruction and long-term stabilization of segmental diaphyseal bone defects of the humerus, femur, and tibia., Indications: Segmental bone defects due to aggressive benign or primary malignant bone tumors, trauma, pathological fractures, osteomyelitis, or failed osteosynthesis., Contraindications: Acute or chronic local infections, large metadiaphyseal bone defects preventing adequate anchorage of the prosthesis, very short life expectancy (<3 months)., Surgical Technique: Exposure and resection of the bony defect according to the preoperative planning. Reaming of the intramedullary canals proximally and distally followed by implantation of the stems (cemented or noncemented). Reducing sleeves can be used to bridge the difference in diameter between the nail and the spacer. Mounting of the spacer half shell with the threaded holes from underneath after adjusting for alignment and rotation. Assembling of the other half shell by guided pins to ensure proper alignment. Tightening of the clamping screws using a torque screwdriver. Connection of two spacers is possible., Postoperative Management: Active physiotherapy and full weight bearing; antibiotic prophylaxis., Results: The results of 14 consecutive patients treated with 15 modular intercalary endoprostheses (Osteobridge™, Merete, Berlin, Germany) between January 2007 and January 2012 with a mean follow up of 24 ± 12 months (range 12-51 months) were evaluated retrospectively. One patient had a primary malignant bone tumor, while all the other patients underwent resection for metastatic disease. The mean age at surgery was 65.9 ± 15.7 years (range 25-83 years). The mean diaphyseal reconstruction length was 110 ± 50 mm (range 50-190 mm). Three patients (20%) required revision of the distal stem due to aseptic loosening. Evaluation of the functional outcome using the MSTS score by Enneking revealed 3 very good (22%), 7 good (50%), 4 fair (28%), and no poor results.

Background: Instability of the sternoclavicular joint is a very uncommon disorder of the shoulder girdle. Acute traumatic dislocations are commonly treated nonoperatively. But severe displacement or chronic instability with recurrent symptomatic subluxation may require surgical intervention. We present our results with open reduction and internal fixation through an autologous gracilis tendon transplant or fiber tape in 8 patients treated surgically. The operative stabilisation of the sternoclavicular joint reduces pain level and improves function of the shoulder. This technique provides an effective surgical procedure for treatment of symptomatic sternoclavicular joint instability., Objective: Restoration of the function and aspect of the sternoclavicular joint., Indications: Chronic and painful instabilities., Contraindications: Local infection, tumor., Surgical Technique: The gracilis tendon graft is harvested as previously described by Petersen. Direct incision over the sternoclavicular joint. Sharp dissection of the periostal sleeve and partial release of sternocleidomastoideus and pextoralis muscle. Resection of osteophytes. Careful placement of a raspatorium under the proximal clavicle and sternum to protect the mediastinal structures. Application of 2.5 or 3.2 mm drill holes to the sternum and the proximal clavicle. The gracilis tendon or the fiber tape is pulled through the drill holes in a figure of eight and then sutured. Recontruction of the joint capsule, closure of the wound., Postoperative Management: Gilchrist brace for 3-5 days, functional physiotherapy with a maximum abduction of 90° for 6 weeks. No carrying or lifting of weights greater than 5 kg for 3 months., Results: During the period from January 2006 to December 2010, 8 patients with sternoclavicular instability were treated. Four patients were treated with fiber tape and four were treated with a gracilis tendon autograft. Postoperative all patients described a reduction of pain and improved shoulder function. The Constant score was 72 points, the DASH 58 points.

Objective: Management of acetabular bone defects Paprosky types IIa and IIb in revision hip arthroplasty by rebuilding the bone stock using impaction bone grafting, primary stable reconstruction with an acetabular reconstruction ring, and restoring the hip center of rotation to its anatomical position., Indications: Acetabular segmental or combined structural defects in the superior acetabular dome with superior/lateral hip center migration with intact anterior and posterior columns (Paprosky types IIa, IIb)., Contraindications: Acute or chronic infections, severe acetabular bone defects preventing adequate anchorage of the prosthesis-particularly destruction of the posterior column., Surgical Technique: Modified transgluteal, lateral approach to the hip joint. Removal of the loose acetabular component. Complete circumferential exposure of the acetabular rim, while maintaining mechanical stability of the remaining bone. Preparation of the homologous spongiosa chips and reconstruction of the acetabular defect in impaction grafting technique. Implantation of the acetabular reconstruction ring and primary stable fixation with cancellous screws in the acetabular dome. Cemented fixation of a polyethylene inlay., Postoperative Management: Mobilization on 2 underarm crutches from postoperative day 1. Partial weight bearing with 20 kg for 6 weeks postoperatively. If plain radiographs show unchanged seating of the prosthesis after 6 weeks, loading can be increased by 10 kg/week until full weight bearing is achieved; thrombosis prophylaxis is continued throughout. Limitation of hip flexion to 90° during the first 6 weeks, and no adduction and forced external rotation to avoid dislocation. Avoidance of sports involving jumping and axial impact loading for 12 months. Radiologic checkups after 3, 6, and 12 months and, thereafter, every 2 years., Results: Analysis between 2008 and 2011 involved 22 consecutive patients with a total of 23 prostheses; the mean follow-up was 38 ± 11 months. Compared to the preoperative evaluation, follow-up yielded a significant improvement in the average Harris Hip Score (82.2 ± 8.7 vs. 44.7 ± 10.7) and the Merle d'Aubigné Score (14.6 ± 1.9 vs. 7.5 ± 1.3). Radiological solid osseointegration of the cup was observed in 21 cases; partial radiolucent lines were seen in 2 cases (9 %) in the zones I-III delineated by DeLee and Charnley. In 21 cases (91 %) radiographs confirmed no measurable migration or displacement of the acetabular component and the bone graft was determined to be incorporated on the basis of osseous consolidation within the grafted area in 20 cases (87 %). During follow-up 3 prosthesis (13 %) required revision.

Objective: The aim of the therapy is mechanical and functional stabilization of high dislocated hips with dysplasia coxarthrosis using total hip arthroplasty (THA)., Indications: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in adults, symptomatic dysplasia coxarthrosis, high hip dislocation according to Crowe type III/IV, and symptomatic leg length inequality., Contraindications: Cerebrospinal dysfunction, muscular dystrophy, apparent disturbance of bone metabolism, acute or chronic infections, and immunocompromised patients., Surgical Technique: With the patient in a lateral decubitus position an incision is made between the anterior border of the gluteus maximus muscle and the posterior border of the gluteus medius muscle (Gibson interval). Identification of the sciatic nerve to protect the nerve from traction disorders by visual control. After performing trochanter flip osteotomy, preparation of the true actetabulum if possible. Implantation of the reinforcement ring, preparation of the femur and if necessary for mobilization, resection until the trochanter minor. Test repositioning under control of the sciatic nerve. Finally, refixation of the trochanteric crest., Postoperative Management: During hospital stay, intensive mobilization of the hip joint using a continuous passive motion machine with maximum flexion of 70°. No active abduction and passive adduction over the body midline. Maximum weight bearing 10-15 kg for 8 weeks, subsequently, first clinical and radiographic follow-up and deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis until full weight bearing., Results: From 1995 to 2012, 28 THAs of a Crow type IV high hip-dislocation were performed in our institute. Until now 14 patients have been analyzed during a follow-up of 8 years in 2012. Mid-term results showed an improvement of the postoperative clinical score (Merle d'Aubigné score) in 86 % of patients. Good to excellent results were obtained in 79 % of cases. Long-term results are not yet available. In one case an iatrogenic neuropraxia of the sciatic nerve was observed and after trauma a redislocation of the arthroplasty appeared in another case. In 2 cases an infection of the THA appeared 8 and 15 months after index surgery. No pseudoarthrosis of the trochanter or aseptic loosening was noticed.

Objective: Reconstruction of segmental bone defects of the proximal femur following wide tumor resection or revision arthroplasty., Indications: Aggressive benign or primary malignant bone tumors of the proximal femur; destructive metastases; massive segmental bone defects of the proximal femur; periprosthetic fractures., Contraindications: Local infection; very short life expectancy (< 3 months); massive deficiency of acetabular bone stock., Operative Technique: Anterolateral approach. Exposure and detachment of the iliopsoas and gluteus medius muscle from the proximal femur with a sufficient safety margin to the bone; distal transsection of the vastus lateralis/intermedius and rectus femoris muscle according to the extraosseous tumor extension; distal femur osteotomy al least 3 cm beyond the farthest point of tumor extension; in case of total femur replacement, additional lateral arthrotomy of the knee with resection of the ligaments and menisci; reaming of the medullary canal after securing the shaft with a Verbrugge clamp; trial assembly and reduction followed by the definitive implantation of the prosthesis with adjustment of the femoral neck anteversion in 5° increments; soft tissue reconstruction and fixation to an attachment tube covering the prosthesis; in case of total femur replacement, the preparation of the tibia is followed by the coupling of the tibial and femoral components., Postoperative Management: Infection prophylaxis, 20 kg partial weight bearing, continuous passive motion., Results: A total of 20  patients with proximal femur replacement and 2 patients with total femur replacement implanted between June 2007 and December 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Three patients had primary malignant bone tumors, while 19 patients underwent resection for metastatic disease. The mean age at surgery was 62.0 ± 18.1 years (18-82 years). Fifteen patients with a mean follow-up of 20.3 ± 17.2 months (4-51 months) were studied. Among the 22 cases, periprosthetic infection occurred in 3 patients (13.6%), dislocation in 2 patients (9.1%). Evaluation of the functional outcome in 15 patients using the MSTS score by Enneking revealed 3 very good (20%), 4 good (26.7%), 6 fair (40%), and 2 poor (13.3%) results.

Objective: Radial head arthroplasty as a treatment of non-reconstructable, comminuted fractures of the radial head in order to achieve elbow stability and to prevent secondary complications, such as valgus elbow instability and radius proximalization., Indications: In acute trauma, a radial head fracture not suitable for internal fixation without (Mason grade III) and with (Mason grade IV) concomitant destabilizing injury, Essex-Lopresti injury, sequelae following radial head resection (e.g., elbow instability or wrist pain), failed reconstruction of the radial head, and tumor-associated radial head or neck resection., Contraindications: General medical contraindications for surgical intervention, cobalt-chromium allergy, and osteoporosis of the proximal radius., Surgical Technique: In supine position, a lateral or posterolateral approach at the elbow was used. The annular ligament was exposed and the radial neck identified just above the bicipital tuberosity. In pronation of the forearm in order to protect the radial nerve, the medullary canal was prepared using rasps. The size of the implant was determined using trial stems. A distance of 0.5 mm between the head of the prosthesis and the capitulum humeri was recommended. After using a small bone plug, the prosthesis was cemented with respect to the anatomical radial curvature. After reconstruction of the annular ligament, the stability of the elbow was verified. In case of instability, the medial collateral ligament was reconstructed and afterwards the wound closed., Postoperative Management: Early mobilization begins the day after surgery. In case of additional injuries, the elbow was supported by an above-elbow cast for 3-4 weeks. To prevent heterotopic ossification, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were used for up to 4 weeks with gastric protection., Results: A total of 13 patients with 15 radial head prosthesis were analyzed at a mean follow-up of 29.5±20.8 months. In all patients, the elbow was stable. Subjectively, good and excellent results were found with one exception. Compared to the pretrauma status, the subjective rate was 78±12%. Based on the Radin and Riseborough score, 6 of the results were good and 9 were fair. According to the Broberg and Morrey score, 1 result was very good, 8 were good, and 6 were fair. The mean DASH score was 9.9±9.7 points. Two temporary nerve lesions were observed. Five patients were diagnosed with heterotopic ossification stage I, while 2 patients were classified with stage II on the Brooker scale.

Objective: Objective Bone-preserving hip resurfacing in young and active patients using a soft-tissue-sparing, modified transgluteal, lateral approach., Indications: Primary hip osteoarthritis in physically active, working patients aged < 65 years (males) and < 60 years (females). Good bone quality., Contraindications: Male patients > or = 65 years of age, female patients > or = 60 years of age. Necrosis of the femoral head. Varus deformity of the femoral neck with a reduced horizontal femoral offset. Femoral head cysts (> 1 cm in diameter). Infection. Osteoporosis. Rheumatoid arthritis. Tumor. Reduced renal function. Leg length difference (> or = 1 cm). Metal allergy. Previous femoral neck fracture. Previous intertrochanteric femoral osteotomies., Surgical Technique: Supine position of the patient. Modified transgluteal, lateral approach to the hip joint. Luxation of the femoral head. First, reaming of the femoral head to improve visualization of the acetabular cup. Central positioning of the guide wire in the femoral neck in a slight valgus position of approximately +5 degrees to the anatomic collodiaphyseal (CCD) angle using the mechanical targeting device. Overdrilling of the central guide wire to the appropriate depth for the implant. Central insertion of the guide rod. Preparation of the femoral head over the guide rod using cylinder cutters one or two sizes larger than the smallest possible femoral component. Cement-free implantation of the acetabular component according to the predetermined definitive size of the femoral component. Final preparation of the femoral head using profile, surface and forming cutter. Following cemented implantation of the femoral component, repositioning of the hip joint and conclusion of the surgical procedure., Postoperative Management: Mobilization of the patient using two forearm crutches as of the 1st day after surgery. Removal of the Redon drains after 24 h. Partial weight bearing of 20 kg for 3 weeks under continuation of thrombosis prophylaxis. Limitation of hip flexion to 90 degrees during the first 6 postoperative weeks, and no adduction and forced external rotation allowed in order to avoid luxation. Avoidance of sports involving the loads of jumping and axial impact loading for 12 postoperative months., Results: Analysis involved the pre- and postoperative functions of 72 patients with a total of 82 prostheses and a mean durability time of 29.2 +/- 11 months based on the Harris Hip Score (HHS), the modified UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) activity index, and the Merle d'Aubigné Score. Postoperatively, prosthetic angle and femoral offset as well as periprosthetic signs of loosening/lytic areas were assessed by means of radiology and compared with the preoperative CCD angle and femoral offset. Compared to the preoperative evaluation, follow-up yielded a significant increase in the average HHS values (94 +/- 4.6 vs. 40.1 +/- 7 points), the modified UCLA activity index (8.9 +/- 2.6 vs. 4.6 +/- 2.2), and the Merle d'Aubigné Score (17.9 +/- 1.9 vs. 7.3 +/- 2.4; p < or = 0.05). In 98.8%, a solid osteointegration of the cup and femoral components was observed. The average deviation of the physiological CCD angle (136.6 degrees +/- 3.6 degrees ) from the postoperative angle of the prosthesis (142.6 degrees +/- 4.9 degrees ) was 6 degrees +/- 2.8 degrees . The postoperative femoral offset was reduced by an average of 2.3 mm compared to the preoperative offset. During clinical follow-up n = 2 prostheses (2.5%) required revision (one femoral neck fracture; one periarticular ossification [Brooker III]).

Objective: Restoration of a painless hip joint capable of bearing weight by uncemented implantation of a rotationally stable, modular revision stem anchored in the diaphysis., Indications: Prosthetic stem loosening with osteolytic bone defects (defect classification types I-III according to Paprosky). Material failure with broken prosthesis. Sub- and/or periprosthetic femoral fractures. Tumors., Contraindications: Extensive osteolysis preventing diaphyseal anchorage of the prosthesis., Surgical Technique: Transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Removal of the loose prosthetic stem and, if cemented, the bone cement as well. Excision of intramedullary granulation tissue. Reaming of the medullary cavity with flexible reaming shafts and form-fit, uncemented implantation of the star-shaped modular revision stem with diaphyseal press fit. If there is extensive loss of metaphyseal bone stock, augmentation with autogenous/allogenic bone should be performed., Postoperative Management: Mobilization on two underarm crutches from the 1st postoperative day. Removal of the Redon drains after 48 h. Partial loading with 20 kg for 6 weeks postoperatively. If plain radiographs show unchanged seating of the prosthesis after 6 weeks, loading can be increased by 10 kg per week until full weight bearing is achieved; thrombosis prophylaxis is continued throughout. Radiologic checkups after 3, 6, and 12 months. After that, the patient should be checked annually., Results: 45 patients (n = 48 prostheses) with an average age of 67.2 years (min.-max. 42.4-87.4 years) were investigated. The average implantation time of the Modular Revision Prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem was 4.7 years (min.-max. 1.0-9.0 years). The Harris Hip Score for Paprosky bone defect types I-III had increased from 25.6 preoperatively to 71.4 postoperatively at the time of the final follow-up (< or = 0.05). Extensively defective bone was diagnosed preoperatively in 32 patients (> or = Paprosky IIB). Plain radiographs showed stable anchorage without migration in 44 patients. In one case, the stem (implantation time 2.36 years) was replaced due to increasing axial subsidence (> or = 5 mm). Good integration of bone graft with subsequent defect regeneration was seen in all patients with bone transplant (n = 30). Postoperative dislocation occurred in six patients and required closed reduction in four cases. Open reduction was performed in two patients, whereby the external rotation angle of the prosthetic neck was corrected without dismantling the distally anchored prosthetic stem components. The mechanical failure rate over the follow-up period of 9 years was one out of the 48 prospectively investigated prostheses. Rate of survival according to Kaplan-Meier was 97%.