Search

Analyze practice patterns of glaucoma surgeons with and without fellowship training.Physician-specific 2017 Medicare data were obtained from the Centers for MedicareMedicaid Services website. Current Procedural Terminology codes identified procedures including iStent, tube shunts, trabeculectomy, complicated trabeculectomy, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation, internal Xen Implant, external Xen or Express shunt, Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy, and Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy. Physicians with fellowship training were identified via the American Glaucoma Society website.A total of 1547 glaucoma surgeons were identified, of which 319 had completed fellowship training. Overall, fellowship-trained glaucoma surgeons performed more services (50.4 ± 47.0 vs 40.5 ± 35.3, P .001) with a larger variety of procedures (1.8 ± 1.0 vs 1.3 ± 0.6, P .001) than those without fellowship training. Surgeons without fellowship training were more likely to perform iStent and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and less likely to perform the remaining procedures than their fellowship-trained counterparts. Medicare payments did not differ between groups and the number of Medicare beneficiaries only differed for internal Xen implant (P = .03). Patient comorbidity burden was similar between groups with about one-third of patients being diagnosed with ischemic heart disease.Surgeons without fellowship training can treat a similar volume of glaucoma patients as those with fellowship training. However, based on surgical procedures employed, their practices are skewed towards mild and moderate glaucoma and they are more limited in their breadth of procedures. In addition, ischemic heart disease was prevalent in the glaucoma patient population.

Vision loss and blindness are among the top ten disabilities in the United States, yet access and utilization of eye care remains low. Vision Detroit aimed to address eye-care disparities via community-based screenings. By investigating burden of eye disease and barriers to eye-care utilization in an underserved urban community, we may direct efforts to improve access.Twenty-three screenings were conducted from March 2015-November 2017. Patient information gathered at screenings were demographics, medical and social history, eye exam/referral history, insurance status, primary care physician (PCP) status, and patient-perceived eye-care barriers.Three-hundred-eighty patients were screened, 42% African American and 51% Hispanic. Average age was 53 ± 16.4 years, 70% reported vision problems, 50% reported over two years of vision problems, and average habitual visual acuity in best-seeing eye was 20/37. Eye-care underutilization was reported in 61% of type-2 diabetics. Older age and PCP recommendations/referrals were associated with increased utilization in all patients. Insurance was the most common barrier (53%); of the 55% insured, 31% reported financial barriers. Employed patients were more likely than unemployed to report a time barrier (odds ratio = 1.76, 95% confidence interval 1.03-3.01). Those with high school or less education reported "unaware of need", "unsure where to go", "transportation", and "insurance" as barriers more often.Visual burden was pervasive, yet access was suboptimal. Financial, logistical, and awareness barriers were common. PCP referral and older age were associated with increased utilization. Those less educated reported more barriers, highlighting the need to address fiscal concerns and eye-health education.