Search

To evaluate clinical characteristics of eyes in which investigator-determined new-onset exudative age-related macular degeneration (eAMD) developed during the FILLY trial.Post hoc analysis of the phase 2 study of intravitreal pegcetacoplan in geographic atrophy (GA).Patients with GA secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), n = 246.Either 15 mg intravitreal pegcetacoplan or sham given monthly or every other month for 12 months followed by a 6-month off-treatment period.Time of new eAMD onset in the study eye, history of eAMD in the fellow eye, presence of double-layer sign (DLS) on structural OCT in the study eye, changes in retinal anatomic features by structural OCT and fluorescein angiography (FA), and changes in visual acuity.Exudation was reported in 26 study eyes across treatment groups over 18 months. Mean time to eAMD diagnosis was 256 days (range, 31-555 days). Overall, a higher proportion of patients with a baseline history of eAMD in the fellow eye (P = 0.016) and a DLS in the study eye (P = 0.0001) demonstrated eAMD. Among study eyes in which eAMD developed, 18 of 26 (69%) had history of fellow-eye eAMD and 19 of 26 (73.1%) had DLS at baseline, compared with 76 of 217 study eyes (35%; P = 0.0007) and 70 of 215 study eyes (32.5%; P0.0001), respectively, in which eAMD did not develop. All 21 patients with structural OCT imaging at the time of eAMD diagnosis demonstrated subretinal fluid, intraretinal cysts, or both consistent with exudation. Among 17 patients who underwent FA at eAMD diagnosis, 10 showed detectable macular neovascularization (MNV), all occult lesions. Development of eAMD did not have an appreciable impact on visual acuity, and all patients responded to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy.Intravitreal pegcetacoplan slowed the rate of GA growth and was associated with an unexpected dose-dependent increased incidence of eAMD with no temporal clustering of onset. Exudative AMD seemed to be associated with baseline eAMD in the contralateral eye and a DLS, suggestive of nonexudative MNV, in the study eye. The safety profile of pegcetacoplan was acceptable to proceed to phase 3 studies without adjustments to enrollment criteria.

Purpose To assess efficacy and safety of sarilumab, a human anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, for treatment of posterior segment noninfectious uveitis (NIU). Design Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Participants Fifty-eight patients (eyes) with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis. Methods Eyes received treatment every 2 weeks for 16 weeks with subcutaneous sarilumab 200 mg or placebo. Main Outcome Measures The primary end point was the proportion of patients with ≥2-step reduction in vitreous haze (VH) on the Miami scale or with a reduction of systemic corticosteroids (prednisolone or equivalent) to a dose of Results At week 16, proportion of patients taking sarilumab or placebo with ≥2-step reduction in VH or corticosteroid dose Conclusions Subcutaneous sarilumab may provide clinical benefits in the management of NIU of the posterior segment, especially in eyes with uveitic macular edema.

Purpose To evaluate whether select baseline systemic and ocular factors influence ≥2-step improvement in the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score at week 100 in VISTA and VIVID. Design Post hoc analysis of 2 similarly designed phase 3 trials, VISTA and VIVID. Participants Total of 456 patients with center-involved diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods VISTA and VIVID randomized 872 DME patients to receive intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation. This post hoc analysis evaluated the influence of select baseline factors on ≥2-step DRSS score improvement by logistic regression in an integrated VISTA and VIVID dataset using observed cases (n = 456) with patients in each treatment group divided into tertiles based on each characteristic. Main Outcome Measures Proportion of patients with ≥2-step improvement in DRSS score from baseline at week 100 by age, duration of diabetes, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and DRSS score. Results At week 100, 10.1%, 34.3%, and 37.6% of patients in the laser, 2q4, and 2q8 groups experienced a ≥2-step DRSS score improvement, respectively. Age, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, BMI, BCVA, and CST had no impact on the ability to achieve ≥2-step improvement in DRSS score. Initial DRSS score was the only factor significantly associated with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement in all treatment groups at weeks 24, 52, 76, and 100. Relatively higher proportions of IAI-treated patients with worse BCVA or thicker CST experienced ≥2-step DRSS score improvement compared with those with better BCVA or thinner CST, respectively, but these associations were not statistically significant. Conclusion A strong association was present between baseline DRSS score and ≥2-step DRSS score improvement at week 100 for DME patients in VISTA and VIVID.

Purpose To evaluate visual and anatomic outcomes after intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) versus laser in diabetic macular edema (DME) patients with and without prior anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for DME. Design Post hoc analysis of eyes from 2 similarly designed, phase 3 trials, VISTA and VIVID. Participants Patients (eyes) with DME with central involvement from VISTA (n = 461) and VIVID (n = 404). Methods Eyes received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation. Main Outcome Measures This study reports exploratory outcomes through week 100. Analyses focused on VISTA because more patients received prior anti-VEGF therapy in VISTA (42.9%) versus VIVID (8.9%). Results Of 42.9% of patients in VISTA who received prior anti-VEGF treatment, 83.3% to 92.6% received ≥ 1 prior injections of bevacizumab, and 71.4% to 82.4% received bevacizumab only as prior anti-VEGF treatment for a duration ranging from 28 days to 3.9 years. In patients with prior anti-VEGF treatment, mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes from baseline in the IAI 2q4, IAI 2q8, and laser groups were +10.4 letters, +10.5 letters, and −0.7 letters at week 52 and +10.9 letters, +10.8 letters, and −0.8 letters at week 100, respectively. Corresponding changes in patients without prior anti-VEGF treatment were +14.1 letters, +11.0 letters, and +0.9 letters at week 52 and +12.0 letters, +11.3 letters, and +2.1 letters at week 100. In patients with prior anti-VEGF treatment, mean reductions in central retinal thickness were 180.2 μm, 192.2 μm, and 90.9 μm at week 52 and 180.1 μm, 196.4 μm, and 94.1 μm at week 100. Corresponding reductions in patients without prior anti-VEGF treatment were 190.3 μm, 175.7 μm, and 61.0 μm at week 52 and 200.0 μm, 186.7 μm, and 76.9 μm at week 100. The most frequent serious ocular adverse event was vitreous hemorrhage (1.3%, 0.7%, and 1.9%, respectively). Conclusions Visual and anatomic improvements over laser with both IAI regimens were significant and similar through week 100 in subgroups of patients in VISTA with and without prior anti-VEGF treatment for DME.

Purpose To evaluate changes in retinal perfusion status with intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) and laser treatment in the phase 3 VISTA study of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Design Post hoc analysis of a double-masked, randomized, active-controlled, phase 3 trial. Participants Patients with center-involved DME in the study eye. Methods VISTA randomized 466 patients to laser, IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), or IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8). One eye per patient was enrolled in the study. Retinal perfusion status was evaluated by fluorescein angiography based on the presence or absence of retinal nonperfusion (RNP) in quadrants intersecting at the optic nerve head by a masked independent reading center at weeks 24, 52, 72, and 100. Visual and anatomic outcomes were evaluated at all visits. In patients who received rescue treatment, data were censored from the time rescue treatment was given. Main Outcome Measures Change in perfusion status from baseline through week 100. Results At week 100, the proportion of eyes with improvement in retinal perfusion (defined as a reduction from baseline in the total number of quadrants in which RNP is present) in the laser control, 2q4, and 2q8 groups was 14.6%, 44.7%, and 40.0%, respectively. The proportion of eyes that experienced worsening in retinal perfusion (defined as an increase from baseline in the total number of quadrants in which RNP is present) at week 100 in the laser control, 2q4, and 2q8 groups was 25.0%, 9.0%, and 8.6%, respectively. Conclusion Post hoc analysis of the phase 3 VISTA study in patients with DME provides evidence that regular IAI dosing not only can slow worsening of retinal perfusion associated with diabetic retinopathy but also may be able to improve retinal perfusion in some cases by decreasing zones of RNP.

To assess efficacy and safety of sarilumab, a human anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, for treatment of posterior segment noninfectious uveitis (NIU).Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study.Fifty-eight patients (eyes) with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis.Eyes received treatment every 2 weeks for 16 weeks with subcutaneous sarilumab 200 mg or placebo.The primary end point was the proportion of patients with ≥2-step reduction in vitreous haze (VH) on the Miami scale or with a reduction of systemic corticosteroids (prednisolone or equivalent) to a dose of10 mg/day at week 16. Primary end point was based on VH evaluation by a central reading center. Investigator evaluation of VH was a prespecified, planned secondary analysis.At week 16, proportion of patients taking sarilumab or placebo with ≥2-step reduction in VH or corticosteroid dose10 mg/day was 46.1% vs. 30.0% (P = 0.2354) based on central reading center assessment of VH and 64.0% vs. 35.0% (P = 0.0372) based on investigator assessment of VH, respectively. In the subgroup of eyes with VH grade ≥2 at baseline, the mean VH reduction from baseline to week 16 was significantly greater with sarilumab vs. placebo regardless of assessment by the central reading center (-2.1 [n = 11] vs. -1.7 [n = 3], respectively; P = 0.0255) or investigator (-2.5 [n = 19] vs. -1.2 [n = 11], respectively; P = 0.0170). The mean best-corrected visual acuity gain from baseline to week 16 was greater with sarilumab vs. placebo in the overall population (8.9 vs. 3.6 letters, respectively; P = 0.0333) and in the subgroup of eyes with central subfield thickness (CST) ≥300 μm at baseline (12.2 [n = 13] vs. 2.1 [n = 7] letters, respectively; P = 0.0517). Corresponding changes in CST were -46.8 vs. +2.6 μm (P = 0.0683) in the overall population and -112.5 [n = 13] vs. -1.8 [n = 6] μm (P = 0.1317) in the subgroup of eyes with CST ≥300 μm at baseline, respectively. The most common ocular adverse events were worsening of uveitis (0 [placebo] and 3 [sarilumab] patients) and retinal infiltrates (1 [placebo] and 2 [sarilumab] patients).Subcutaneous sarilumab may provide clinical benefits in the management of NIU of the posterior segment, especially in eyes with uveitic macular edema.

Purpose To assess change in intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD) receiving intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) or ranibizumab in VEGF Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet AMD (VIEW) 1 and 2 studies. Design Analyses from 2 randomized, active-controlled, phase III trials. Participants A total of 2457 patients with NVAMD. Methods Patients received IAI 2 mg every (q) 4 weeks (2q4), 0.5 mg q4 weeks (0.5q4), 2 mg q8 weeks (after 3 monthly doses; 2q8), or ranibizumab 0.5 mg q4 weeks (Rq4) for 52 weeks. At week 52, patients were switched to a variable regimen requiring at least quarterly dosing and allowing interim injections based on anatomic and visual assessment. Main Outcome Measures Pre-injection IOP was analyzed in study and uninjected fellow eyes from baseline to week 96. Prespecified end points included mean change in IOP from baseline and prevalence of a >21 mmHg and >10 mmHg increase in IOP from baseline. Cumulative incidence of sustained (at 2 consecutive visits) IOP >21 mmHg, a single event of IOP >25 mmHg, and sustained IOP increase from baseline (≥5 mmHg) was also evaluated. Results Mean IOP change from baseline over 96 weeks in all IAI groups was consistently lower than in the Rq4 group, and this finding was replicated in both trials. In an analysis integrating both studies, the proportion of study eyes with IOP >21 mmHg at week 96 was 20.2%, 14.2%, 12.1%, and 12.5% in Rq4, 2q4, 2q8, and 0.5q4, respectively. Reduction in risk, relative to Rq4, of having sustained IOP >21 mmHg over 96 weeks was 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36%–78%), 50% (95% CI, 19%–70%), and 69% (95% CI, 45%–84%) for 2q4, 2q8, and 0.5q4, respectively. Risk reduction in the IAI groups for a sustained IOP increase ≥5 mmHg was 31% (95% CI, 8%–48%), 38% (95% CI, 17%–54%), and 47% (95% CI, 27%–61%), respectively. In uninjected fellow eyes, only sustained IOP >21 mmHg events were higher in the Rq4 group compared with all IAI groups. Conclusions Incidence of elevated IOP in eyes with NVAMD was lower in all IAI groups than in the ranibizumab group.

To evaluate whether select baseline systemic and ocular factors influence ≥2-step improvement in the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score at week 100 in VISTA and VIVID.Post hoc analysis of 2 similarly designed phase 3 trials, VISTA and VIVID.Total of 456 patients with center-involved diabetic macular edema (DME).VISTA and VIVID randomized 872 DME patients to receive intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation. This post hoc analysis evaluated the influence of select baseline factors on ≥2-step DRSS score improvement by logistic regression in an integrated VISTA and VIVID dataset using observed cases (n = 456) with patients in each treatment group divided into tertiles based on each characteristic.Proportion of patients with ≥2-step improvement in DRSS score from baseline at week 100 by age, duration of diabetes, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and DRSS score.At week 100, 10.1%, 34.3%, and 37.6% of patients in the laser, 2q4, and 2q8 groups experienced a ≥2-step DRSS score improvement, respectively. Age, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, BMI, BCVA, and CST had no impact on the ability to achieve ≥2-step improvement in DRSS score. Initial DRSS score was the only factor significantly associated with ≥2-step DRSS score improvement in all treatment groups at weeks 24, 52, 76, and 100. Relatively higher proportions of IAI-treated patients with worse BCVA or thicker CST experienced ≥2-step DRSS score improvement compared with those with better BCVA or thinner CST, respectively, but these associations were not statistically significant.A strong association was present between baseline DRSS score and ≥2-step DRSS score improvement at week 100 for DME patients in VISTA and VIVID.

Purpose To assess long-term safety and efficacy of intraocular ranibizumab injections in patients with macular edema after retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Design Open-label extension trial of the 12-month Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety (BRAVO) and Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Study: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety (CRUISE) trials. Participants We included 304 patients who completed BRAVO and 304 patients who completed CRUISE. Methods Patients were seen at least every 3 months and given an intraocular injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab if they met prespecified retreatment criteria. Main Outcome Measures Primary outcomes were incidence and severity of ocular and nonocular adverse events (AEs). Key efficacy outcomes included mean change from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol and central foveal thickness. Results In patients who completed month 12, the mean number of injections (excluding month 12 injection) in the sham/0.5-, 0.3/0.5-, and 0.5-mg groups was 2.0, 2.4, and 2.1 (branch RVO) and 2.9, 3.8, and 3.5 (central RVO), respectively. The incidence of study eye ocular serious AEs (SAEs) and SAEs potentially related to systemic vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition across treatment arms was 2% to 9% and 1% to 6%, respectively. The mean change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 12 in branch RVO patients was 0.9 (sham/0.5 mg), −2.3 (0.3/0.5 mg), and −0.7 (0.5 mg), respectively. The mean change from baseline BCVA at month 12 in central RVO patients was −4.2 (sham/0.5 mg), −5.2 (0.3/0.5 mg), and −4.1 (0.5 mg), respectively. Conclusions No new safety events were identified with long-term use of ranibizumab; rates of SAEs potentially related to treatment were consistent with prior ranibizumab trials. Reduced follow-up and fewer ranibizumab injections in the second year of treatment were associated with a decline in vision in central RVO patients, but vision in branch RVO patients remained stable. Results suggest that during the second year of ranibizumab treatment of RVO patients, follow-up and injections should be individualized and, on average, central RVO patients may require more frequent follow-up than every 3 months. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Assess the 12-month efficacy and safety of intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab in patients with macular edema after central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).Prospective, randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter clinical trial.We included 392 patients with macular edema after CRVO.Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 6 monthly intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg of ranibizumab or sham injections. After 6 months, all patients with BCVA ≤20/40 or central subfield thickness ≥250 μm could receive ranibizumab.Mean change from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score at month 12, additional parameters of visual function, central foveal thickness (CFT), and other anatomic changes were assessed.Mean (95% confidence interval) change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 12 was 13.9 (11.2-16.5) and 13.9 (11.5-16.4) in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg groups, respectively, and 7.3 (4.5-10.0) in the sham/0.5 mg group (P0.001 for each ranibizumab group vs. sham/0.5 mg). The percentage of patients who gained ≥15 letters from baseline BCVA at month 12 was 47.0% and 50.8% in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg groups, respectively, and 33.1% in the sham/0.5 mg group. On average, there was a marked reduction in CFT after the first as-needed injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab in the sham/0.5 mg group to the level of the ranibizumab groups, which was sustained through month 12. No new ocular or nonocular safety events were identified.On average, treatment with ranibizumab as needed during months 6 through 11 maintained the visual and anatomic benefits achieved by 6 monthly ranibizumab injections in patients with macular edema after CRVO, with low rates of ocular and nonocular safety events. After sham injections for 6 months, treatment with ranibizumab as needed for 6 months resulted in rapid reduction in CFT in the sham/0.5 mg group to a level similar to that in the 2 ranibizumab treatment groups and an improvement in BCVA, but not to the same level as that in the 2 ranibizumab groups. Intraocular injections of ranibizumab provide an effective treatment for macular edema after CRVO.Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Assess 12-month efficacy and safety of intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab in patients with macular edema after branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).Prospective, randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter trial.A total of 397 patients with macular edema after BRVO.Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to 6 monthly injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab or sham injections. After 6 months, all patients with study eye best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤20/40 or central subfield thickness ≥250 μm were to receive ranibizumab. Patients could receive rescue laser treatment once during the treatment period and once during the observation period if criteria were met.The main efficacy outcome reported is mean change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 12. Additional visual and anatomic parameters were assessed.Mean (95% confidence interval) change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 12 was 16.4 (14.5-18.4) and 18.3 (15.8-20.9) in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg groups, respectively, and 12.1 (9.6-14.6) in the sham/0.5 mg group (P0.01, each ranibizumab group vs. sham/0.5 mg). The percentage of patients who gained ≥15 letters from baseline BCVA at month 12 was 56.0% and 60.3% in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg groups, respectively, and 43.9% in the sham/0.5 mg group. On average, there was a marked reduction in central foveal thickness (CFT) after the first as-needed injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab in the sham/0.5 mg group, which was sustained through month 12. No new ocular or nonocular safety events were identified.At month 12, treatment with ranibizumab as needed during months 6-11 maintained, on average, the benefits achieved by 6 monthly ranibizumab injections in patients with macular edema after BRVO, with low rates of ocular and nonocular safety events. In the sham/0.5 mg group, treatment with ranibizumab as needed for 6 months resulted in rapid reduction in CFT to a similar level as that in the 0.3 mg ranibizumab treatment group and an improvement in BCVA, but not to the extent of that in the 2 ranibizumab groups. Intraocular injections of ranibizumab provide an effective treatment for macular edema after BRVO.Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Purpose To assess the ocular and systemic safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) compared with controls in IAI trials in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion (MEfCRVO), macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion (MEfBRVO), and diabetic macular edema (DME). Design Comprehensive review of 10 phase II and III trials of IAI in retinal diseases. Participants Patients were included from IAI trials in nAMD (CLEAR-IT 2 [52 weeks], VIEW 1 [96 weeks], VIEW 2 [96 weeks], VIEW 1 extension [208 weeks]); MEfCRVO (COPERNICUS [100 weeks], GALILEO [76 weeks]); MEfBRVO (VIBRANT [52 weeks]); and DME (DA VINCI [52 weeks], VIVID [100 weeks], VISTA [100 weeks]). Methods Rates were calculated as events/100 person-years at risk (PYR). When applicable, rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were provided. Main Outcome Measures Outcomes included rates for intraocular inflammation, endophthalmitis, serious adverse events (SAEs), wound-healing complications, hypertension (HTN), adjudicated Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration (APTC)–defined arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs) (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and vascular death), and death from all causes. Results More than 4000 patients contributed >7000 PYR. For all outcomes, there were no meaningful differences between evaluated adverse event rates for IAI and controls. Overall intraocular inflammation rates were 2.37 (control) and 2.06 (IAI); overall RR was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.61–1.27). Overall endophthalmitis rates were 0.52 (control) and 0.22 (IAI); overall RR was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.18–1.03). Overall SAE rates were 23.09 (control) and 20.80 (IAI); overall RR was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.80–1.02). Overall rates of wound-healing complications were 0.17 (control) and 0.15 (IAI); overall RR was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.24–3.86). Overall HTN rates were 14.87 (control) and 11.27 (IAI), with an overall RR of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.65–0.89); HTN rates were highest in MEfBRVO and lowest in nAMD. For adjudicated APTC-defined ATEs, rates were 2.04 (control) and 2.19 (IAI), with an RR of 1.07 (95% CI, 0.73–1.61). Overall death rates were 1.16 (control) and 1.49 (IAI); overall RR was 1.28 (95% CI, 0.80–2.15). Conclusions Rates of selected ocular and systemic adverse events with IAI were similar to those of controls and similar across disease states in evaluated IAI trials. Intravitreal aflibercept injection was generally well tolerated in the patients evaluated.

Purpose Smoking, age, and nutrition have been associated with the development of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and can increase the risk of arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs). This study assesses annual rates of ATEs in new-onset neovascular AMD patients compared with matched controls. Design Retrospective study. Participants New-onset neovascular AMD patients and age-, race-, gender-, and database length–matched controls from the 5% Medicare database. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 5% Medicare database from 2001 to 2003. New-onset neovascular AMD patients were included if they were ≥65 years old, had 2 diagnoses of neovascular AMD, and had at least 1 year of data before the first diagnosis of AMD within the dataset. A control group was constructed in a 3:1 ratio from those without a diagnosis of a major eye disorder and matched by age, race, gender, and length of data. Annual prevalence rates were determined for myocardial infarctions (MIs) and ischemic cerebral vascular accidents (CVAs). Main Outcome Measures Rates of MIs and ischemic CVAs in new-onset neovascular AMD patients and matched controls from 2001 to 2003. Results There were 15771 new-onset neovascular AMD patients identified and matched with 46 408 controls. Average age was 80.5 years, with 64% ≥80; 65% were female; and 95.9% were white. Inpatient MI rates for neovascular AMD patients and controls were 2.2% and 2.2%, respectively ( P = 0.74). Inpatient ischemic CVA rates for neovascular AMD patients and controls were 3.5% and 3.6%, respectively ( P = 0.59). Myocardial infarction rates and ischemic CVA rates for both groups increased with age. Subgroups of patients with comorbidities known to be risk factors for ATEs (i.e., hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and arrhythmias) had a higher rate of events. Patients with previous ATEs were also at a higher risk of subsequent events, at 7.4% for inpatient MI and 35.1% for inpatient ischemic stroke. Conclusion Despite the shared risk factors associated with neovascular AMD and ATEs, Medicare beneficiaries with neovascular AMD had a rate of ATEs similar to that of matched controls. Rates of ATEs increased in patients with comorbidities and for patients with previous events.

To evaluate visual and anatomic outcomes after intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) versus laser in diabetic macular edema (DME) patients with and without prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for DME.Post hoc analysis of eyes from 2 similarly designed, phase 3 trials, VISTA and VIVID.Patients (eyes) with DME with central involvement from VISTA (n = 461) and VIVID (n = 404).Eyes received IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation.This study reports exploratory outcomes through week 100. Analyses focused on VISTA because more patients received prior anti-VEGF therapy in VISTA (42.9%) versus VIVID (8.9%).Of 42.9% of patients in VISTA who received prior anti-VEGF treatment, 83.3% to 92.6% received ≥ 1 prior injections of bevacizumab, and 71.4% to 82.4% received bevacizumab only as prior anti-VEGF treatment for a duration ranging from 28 days to 3.9 years. In patients with prior anti-VEGF treatment, mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes from baseline in the IAI 2q4, IAI 2q8, and laser groups were +10.4 letters, +10.5 letters, and -0.7 letters at week 52 and +10.9 letters, +10.8 letters, and -0.8 letters at week 100, respectively. Corresponding changes in patients without prior anti-VEGF treatment were +14.1 letters, +11.0 letters, and +0.9 letters at week 52 and +12.0 letters, +11.3 letters, and +2.1 letters at week 100. In patients with prior anti-VEGF treatment, mean reductions in central retinal thickness were 180.2 μm, 192.2 μm, and 90.9 μm at week 52 and 180.1 μm, 196.4 μm, and 94.1 μm at week 100. Corresponding reductions in patients without prior anti-VEGF treatment were 190.3 μm, 175.7 μm, and 61.0 μm at week 52 and 200.0 μm, 186.7 μm, and 76.9 μm at week 100. The most frequent serious ocular adverse event was vitreous hemorrhage (1.3%, 0.7%, and 1.9%, respectively).Visual and anatomic improvements over laser with both IAI regimens were significant and similar through week 100 in subgroups of patients in VISTA with and without prior anti-VEGF treatment for DME.

To assess long-term safety and efficacy of intraocular ranibizumab injections in patients with macular edema after retinal vein occlusion (RVO).Open-label extension trial of the 12-month Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety (BRAVO) and Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Study: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety (CRUISE) trials.We included 304 patients who completed BRAVO and 304 patients who completed CRUISE.Patients were seen at least every 3 months and given an intraocular injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab if they met prespecified retreatment criteria.Primary outcomes were incidence and severity of ocular and nonocular adverse events (AEs). Key efficacy outcomes included mean change from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol and central foveal thickness.In patients who completed month 12, the mean number of injections (excluding month 12 injection) in the sham/0.5-, 0.3/0.5-, and 0.5-mg groups was 2.0, 2.4, and 2.1 (branch RVO) and 2.9, 3.8, and 3.5 (central RVO), respectively. The incidence of study eye ocular serious AEs (SAEs) and SAEs potentially related to systemic vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition across treatment arms was 2% to 9% and 1% to 6%, respectively. The mean change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 12 in branch RVO patients was 0.9 (sham/0.5 mg), -2.3 (0.3/0.5 mg), and -0.7 (0.5 mg), respectively. The mean change from baseline BCVA at month 12 in central RVO patients was -4.2 (sham/0.5 mg), -5.2 (0.3/0.5 mg), and -4.1 (0.5 mg), respectively.No new safety events were identified with long-term use of ranibizumab; rates of SAEs potentially related to treatment were consistent with prior ranibizumab trials. Reduced follow-up and fewer ranibizumab injections in the second year of treatment were associated with a decline in vision in central RVO patients, but vision in branch RVO patients remained stable. Results suggest that during the second year of ranibizumab treatment of RVO patients, follow-up and injections should be individualized and, on average, central RVO patients may require more frequent follow-up than every 3 months.

To assess the efficacy and safety of intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab in patients with macular edema after central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).Prospective, randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter clinical trial.A total of 392 patients with macular edema after CRVO.Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive monthly intraocular injections of 0.3 or 0.5 mg of ranibizumab or sham injections.The primary efficacy outcome measure was mean change from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score at month 6. Secondary outcomes included other parameters of visual function and central foveal thickness (CFT).Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 6 was 12.7 (9.9-15.4) and 14.9 (12.6-17.2) in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg ranibizumab groups, respectively, and 0.8 (-2.0 to 3.6) in the sham group (P0.0001 for each ranibizumab group vs. sham). The percentage of patients who gainedor =15 letters in BCVA at month 6 was 46.2% (0.3 mg) and 47.7% (0.5 mg) in the ranibizumab groups and 16.9% in the sham group (P0.0001 for each ranibizumab group vs. sham). At month 6, significantly more ranibizumab-treated patients (0.3 mg = 43.9%; 0.5 mg = 46.9%) had BCVA ofor = 20/40 compared with sham patients (20.8%; P0.0001 for each ranibizumab group vs. sham), and CFT had decreased by a mean of 434 microm (0.3 mg) and 452 microm (0.5 mg) in the ranibizumab groups and 168 microm in the sham group (P0.0001 for each ranibizumab group vs. sham). The median percent reduction in excess foveal thickness at month 6 was 94.0% and 97.3% in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg groups, respectively, and 23.9% in the sham group. The safety profile was consistent with previous phase III ranibizumab trials, and no new safety events were identified in patients with CRVO.Intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab provided rapid improvement in 6-month visual acuity and macular edema following CRVO, with low rates of ocular and nonocular safety events.

To assess efficacy and safety of intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab in patients with macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).Prospective, randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter clinical trial.A total of 397 patients with macular edema following BRVO.Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive monthly intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg of ranibizumab or sham injections.The primary efficacy outcome measure was mean change from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score at month 6. Secondary outcomes included other parameters of visual function and central foveal thickness (CFT).Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 6 was 16.6 (14.7-18.5) and 18.3 (16.0-20.6) in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg ranibizumab groups and 7.3 (5.1-9.5) in the sham group (P0.0001 for each ranibizumab group vs sham). The percentage of patients who gainedor =15 letters in BCVA at month 6 was 55.2% (0.3 mg) and 61.1% (0.5 mg) in the ranibizumab groups and 28.8% in the sham group (P0.0001 for each ranibizumab group vs sham). At month 6, significantly more ranibizumab-treated patients (0.3 mg, 67.9%; 0.5 mg, 64.9%) had BCVA ofor =20/40 compared with sham patients (41.7%; P0.0001 for each ranibizumab group vs sham); and CFT had decreased by a mean of 337 microm (0.3 mg) and 345 microm (0.5 mg) in the ranibizumab groups and 158 microm in the sham group (P0.0001 for each ranibizumab group vs sham). The median percent reduction in excess foveal thickness at month 6 was 97.0% and 97.6% in 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg groups and 27.9% in the sham group. More patients in the sham group (54.5%) received rescue grid laser compared with the 0.3 mg (18.7%) and 0.5 mg (19.8%) ranibizumab groups. The safety profile was consistent with previous phase III ranibizumab trials, and no new safety events were identified in patients with BRVO.Intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab provided rapid, effective treatment for macular edema following BRVO with low rates of ocular and nonocular safety events.

Purpose To assess efficacy and safety of intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab in patients with macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Design Prospective, randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter clinical trial. Participants A total of 397 patients with macular edema following BRVO. Methods Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive monthly intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg of ranibizumab or sham injections. Main Outcome Measures The primary efficacy outcome measure was mean change from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score at month 6. Secondary outcomes included other parameters of visual function and central foveal thickness (CFT). Results Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 6 was 16.6 (14.7–18.5) and 18.3 (16.0–20.6) in the 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg ranibizumab groups and 7.3 (5.1–9.5) in the sham group ( P P P P Conclusions Intraocular injections of 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg ranibizumab provided rapid, effective treatment for macular edema following BRVO with low rates of ocular and nonocular safety events. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.