Search

Purpose: To describe the incidence, risk factors, clinical characteristics, and long-term outcomes of a hypertensive phase (HP) after glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Participants: Eyes that underwent implantation of their first GDD from January 2010 to October 2020 at a tertiary care center., Methods: Hypertensive phase was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) >21 mmHg occurring at 2 consecutive visits in the first 90 days after the date of surgery for Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) or in the first 90 days after tube opening for Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant (BGI). Generalized estimating equations and Fisher exact tests were used to evaluate risk factors for HP and risk factors for failure of GDD surgery after occurrence of a HP., Main Outcome Measures: Incidence and risk factors for HP. Overall surgical success rates, defined as the absence of failure criteria: IOP >21 mmHg, ≤5 mmHg, or <20% reduction below baseline IOP after 3 months for 2 consecutive visits, with or without adjunctive ocular hypotensive therapy; additional glaucoma surgery; or loss of light perception., Results: Among 419 eyes of 360 patients that underwent GDD implantation, 42 (10.0%) eyes developed HP. Onset of HP was 20.8 ± 10.5 days after AGV and 11.7 ± 20.3 days from the date of tube opening after BGI. Mean IOP during HP was 26.5 ± 3.2 mmHg with peak IOP of 30.0 ± 5.9 mmHg. Median follow-up duration was 21.5 months after onset of HP. Younger age and neovascular glaucoma were significant risk factors for HP occurrence in a multivariable model. Resolution of HP occurred in 32 eyes (76.2%) after a mean duration of 48.0 ± 53.0 days. Additional surgery with a second GDD or cyclophotocoagulation was performed for 12 eyes (28.6%). The overall success rate among eyes with a HP was 52.6% at 2 years, which was significantly lower than that observed among control eyes that did not experience HP (76.3%), P < 0.01., Conclusions: The incidence of HP was 10.0%. Younger age and neovascular glaucoma were significant risk factors for HP in the multivariable model. The risk of surgical failure after HP is significantly higher compared to eyes that did not experience HP., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare outcomes of early aqueous suppression (EAS) and standard therapy (ST) after Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) implantation for uveitic glaucoma., Design: Retrospective comparative cohort study., Participants: All patients with uveitic glaucoma underwent AGV implantation from January 2010 to October 2020 at Northwestern Medicine., Methods: Excluding the first postoperative day 1 (POD1), only eyes with IOP 10-15 mmHg at their first visit with IOP ≥ 10 mmHg were included in the main analysis. Early aqueous suppression (EAS) was defined as initiation of ocular hypotensive therapy when IOP was first 10-15 mmHg. Standard therapy was initiation of therapy at any later time. Failure was defined as IOP > 21 mmHg, < 5 mmHg, or < 20% reduction in IOP from baseline after 3 months, for 2 consecutive study visits. Hypotony was defined as IOP ≤ 5 mmHg for ≥ 2 visits. Hypertensive phase was defined as IOP > 21 mmHg for 2 consecutive visits in the first 3 months., Main Outcome Measures: Proportion achieving overall success; incidence of hypotony and hypertensive phase., Results: Twenty-eight eyes of 26 patients were in the EAS group and 20 eyes of 19 patients were in the ST group, with a mean follow-up of 17.7 and 28.2 months, respectively. Baseline IOP was similar in the EAS (31.2 ± 10.1 mmHg) and ST (34.6 ± 12.2 mmHg) groups; P = 0.18. Final IOP was lower in the EAS group (12.9 ± 4.6 mmHg) than the ST group (16.4 ± 5.7 mmHg; P = 0.02) on 2.6 ± 0.9 medications in the EAS group and 1.8 ± 1.5 in the ST group (P = 0.07). Overall success was achieved in 87% of EAS eyes and 74% of ST eyes (P = 0.43). There were no statistically significant differences in the occurrence of additional glaucoma surgery (4% for EAS, 20% for ST; P = 0.11), hypotony (7% for EAS, 0% for ST; P = 0.50), or hypertensive phase (4% for EAS, 21% for ST; P = 0.09)., Conclusions: EAS was associated with a lower final IOP after AGV in uveitic glaucoma eyes; however, more medications were in use at the final visit. No statistically significant differences in overall success or the incidence of adverse events were observed., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)