Search

Purpose: Hyperreflective foci (HRF) are OCT biomarkers for the progression of nonneovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) attributed to anteriorly migrated retinal pigment epithelial cells. We examined associations between rod- and cone-mediated vision and HRF plus smaller hyperreflective specks (HRS); we identified a histologic candidate for HRS., Design: Cross-sectional study and histologic survey., Participants: Patients with healthy maculae (n = 34), early AMD (n = 26), and intermediate AMD (n = 41)., Methods: AMD severity was determined by color fundus photography. In OCT scans, HRF and HRS were counted manually. Vision tests probed cones (best-corrected visual acuity [VA], contrast sensitivity), mixed cones and rods (low-luminance VA, low-luminance deficit, mesopic light sensitivity), or rods (scotopic light sensitivity, rod-mediated dark adaptation [RMDA]). An online AMD histopathologic resource was reviewed., Main Outcome Measures: Vision in eyes assessed for HRF and HRS; histologic candidate for HRS., Results: In 101 eyes of 101 patients, HRF and HRS were identified in 25 and 95 eyes, respectively, with good reliability. Hyperreflective foci were present but sparse in healthy eyes, infrequent in early AMD eyes, and frequent but highly variable among intermediate AMD eyes (mean±standard deviation [SD] number per eye, 0.1 ± 0.2, 0.2 ± 0.5, and 1.9 ± 3.4 for healthy, early AMD, and intermediate AMD eyes, respectively). Hyperreflective specks outnumbered HRF in all groups (mean±SD, 4.5 ± 3.2, 6.3 ± 5.8, and 19.4 ± 22.4, respectively). Delayed RMDA was associated strongly with more HRF and HRS (P < 0.0001). Hyperreflective foci also were associated with worse low-luminance VA (P = 0.0117). Hyperreflective specks were associated with worse contrast sensitivity (P = 0.0278), low-luminance VA (P = 0.0010), low-luminance deficit (P = 0.0031), and mesopic (P = 0.0018) and scotopic (P < 0.0001) sensitivity. By histologic analysis, cone lipofuscin was found in outer retinal layers of 25% of healthy aged eyes., Conclusions: Hyperreflective foci and HRS are markers of cellular activity associated with visual dysfunction, especially delayed RMDA, an AMD risk indicator assessing efficiency of retinoid resupply. Hyperreflective specks may represent lipofuscin translocating inwardly within cones. HRF and HRS may serve as structural end points in clinical trials targeting AMD stages earlier than atrophy expansion. These results should be confirmed in a larger sample., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: OCT has revealed many details of retinal disease that were not available with older imaging technologies. In eyes of adults older than 60 years with healthy maculas as determined by color fundus photography (CFP) and a validated grading system, we screened for pathologic features using OCT. We also tested visual function to assess potential impact of the observed pathologic features on patients., Design: Cross-sectional study., Participants: Persons recruited from primary ophthalmology care clinics., Methods: Color fundus photographs were assessed by the 9-step Age-Related Eye Disease Study scale. OCT macular volumes of participants at step 1 on the Age-Related Eye Disease Study scale, considered healthy, were reviewed by a retina specialist masked to other participant characteristics. Participants were tested for 6 different cone- and rod-mediated visual functions., Main Outcome Measures: Percentage of participants with disorders detected on OCT review and visual function measures., Results: In 138 of 984 eyes (14%) considered healthy by CFP, pathologic features were detectable by OCT, with 8.4% having vitreomacular interface disorders. Among the low-prevalence disorders found, 5 eyes (0.5%) showed macular telangiectasia type 2. Relative to eyes lacking detectable chorioretinal pathologic features, eyes with any pathologic features were associated with poorer low-luminance visual acuity and rod-mediated dark adaptation. In eyes with epiretinal membranes, the largest single entity identified (n = 61 [6.2%]), significantly worse visual functions were best-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.0444), low-luminance visual acuity (P = 0.0151), and light sensitivity (central 3° and 9°; P = 0.0035 and P = 0.0097, respectively)., Conclusions: Macular pathologic features with functional visual implications not identified by clinical examination or CFP are detectable with OCT. Vitreomacular interface disorders often are visually significant and treatable conditions that are visible on OCT, but are easily missed on CFP and clinical examination. Another such condition best seen on OCT is macular telangiectasia type 2, an untreatable disorder for which a clinical trial is in progress. OCT has a potential role in primary eye care clinics to screen for retinal pathologic features, especially in eyes with decreased visual acuity and otherwise normal examination results., (Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)