Search

This article will study the control of conventionality and the margin of appreciation as legal-political models for the protection of human rights derived from the particular visions, needs and institutional resources of the OAS States and the Council of Europe respectively, establishing, notwithstanding the disparate methods of integration of international law, that human dignity is the universal objective for the effective exercise of justice apparatus. For this objective, since a research descriptive and explicative, and used a dogmatic methodologist, and sub methods systematic, analytic and judgment facts, we will conclude that first, the effects of national sovereignty should be diminished, because this limit the guarantee harmonization of the legal system, and then, secondly, build a minimum international standard through a constitutional space common to provide a balance of rights universally protected by multilevel judges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]