Search

Objectives: To describe differences in cancer stem cell (CSC) presence and behavior associated with their intratumor compartment of origin using a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC)., Materials and Methods: Four HPV-negative OCSCC PDX cases were selected (CUHN004, CUHN013, CUHN096, CUHN111) and the percentage of CSCs (ALDH + CD44 high ) was measured in the tumor Leading Edge (LE) and Core compartments of each PDX tumor case via fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). The fraction of cells in the proliferative phase was measured by Ki-67 labelling index of paraffin embedded tissue. The proliferation and invasion of LE versus Core CSCs were compared using sphere and Matrigel invasion assays, respectively., Results: Both CUHN111 and CUHN004 demonstrate CSC enrichment in their LE compartments while CUHN013 and CUHN096 show no intratumor difference. Cases with LE CSC enrichment demonstrate greater Ki-67 labelling at the LE. CSC proliferative potential, assessed by sphere formation, reveals greater sphere formation in CUHN111 LE CSCs, but no difference between CUHN013 LE and Core CSCs. CUHN111 CSCs do not demonstrate an intratumor difference in invasiveness while CUHN013 LE CSCs are more invasive than Core CSCs., Conclusion: A discrete intratumor CSC niche is present in a subset of OCSCC PDX tumors. The CSC functional phenotype with regard to proliferation and invasion is associated with the intratumor compartment of origin of the CSC: LE or Core. These individual functional characteristics appear to be modulated independently of one another and independently of the presence of an intratumor CSC niche., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: This phase 1, dose-finding study determined the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), antitumor activity, and molecular correlates of IPI-926, a Hedgehog pathway (HhP) inhibitor, combined with cetuximab in patients with relapsed/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck., Patients and Methods: Cetuximab was given with a 400mg/m(2) loading dose followed by 250mg/m(2) weekly. IPI-926 was given daily starting two weeks after cetuximab initiation. A "3+3" study design was used. Prior therapy with cetuximab was allowed. Tumor biopsies occurred prior to cetuximab initiation, prior to IPI-926 initiation, and after treatment with both drugs., Results: Nine patients were enrolled. The RP2D was 160mg, the same as the single-agent IPI-926 MTD. Among 9 treated, 8 evaluable patients, the best responses were 1 partial response (12.5%), 4 stable disease (50%), and 3 disease progressions (37.5%). The median progression free survival was 77days (95% confidence interval 39-156). Decreases in tumor size were seen in both cetuximab-naïve patients (one HPV-positive, one HPV-negative). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue, muscle cramps, and rash. No DLTs were observed. Tumor shrinkage and progression free survival were associated with intra-tumoral ErbB and HhP gene expression down-regulation during therapy, supporting the preclinical hypothesis., Conclusion: Treatment with IPI-926 and cetuximab yielded expected toxicities with signs of anti-tumor activity. Serial tumor biopsies were feasible and revealed proof-of-concept biomarkers., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)