1. Comparison of in situ cone beam computed tomography scan data with ex vivo optical scan data in the measurement of root surface area
- Author
-
Curtis S K Chen, Pengcheng Jia, Mu-Qing Liu, Wenjie Hu, Yijiao Zhao, Kwok-Hung Chung, and Gang Yang
- Subjects
In situ ,Cone beam computed tomography ,Scanner ,Mandible ,Pathology and Forensic Medicine ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Imaging, Three-Dimensional ,stomatognathic system ,Cadaver ,Equivalence test ,Medicine ,Animals ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Dentistry (miscellaneous) ,Tooth Root ,Radionuclide Imaging ,Anterior teeth ,Sheep ,business.industry ,Root surface area ,030206 dentistry ,Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Surgery ,Oral Surgery ,business ,Smoothing ,Software ,Biomedical engineering - Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to compare root surface area (RSA) measurements of single-root teeth in a sheep mandible based on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with measurements made with an optical scanner. Study Design Eight anterior teeth of a sheep cadaver mandible were scanned in situ by using CBCT with 3 different exposure parameters, followed by treatment with smoothing software. The teeth were then extracted and scanned individually with an optical scanner. Three-dimensional digital models of the teeth were reconstructed on the basis of CBCT and optical scanner data. RSA data were calculated, and an equivalence test was used to statistically compare the measurements with significance of difference established at α = 0.05. Results The means of the differences between RSA measurements from CBCT and optical scanning ranged from 0.33% to 3.01%. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 methods. The smoothing parameters for good fitness of the linear regression were determined to be 0.8 for the smooth factor, 8 for iterations, and 0 for compensate shrinkage. Conclusions The proposed CBCT technique to measure RSA is feasible. RSA data obtained from CBCT in situ are as accurate as optical scanner measurements ex vivo.
- Published
- 2018