Search

• Extracted bitumen and solid bitumen were characterized simultaneously. • Characterization was carried out at lamina scale and lithofacies scale. • Biomarkers reveal greater thermal maturity in source rocks than reservoirs. • Raman spectroscopy reveals greater thermal maturity in reservoirs than source rocks. • Organic–inorganic interactions increase the aromaticity of solid bitumen. Organic solvent extracted bitumen (EB) and microscopically observed solid bitumen (SB) carry many geological implications in unconventional source-rock reservoirs. EB is a commonly used term in organic geochemistry, and SB is normally used in organic petrology. Although both EB and SB are secondary organic matter initially formed from kerogen degradation and partially describe the same components, they are defined by different physical and chemical criteria and have specific applications, and thus are rarely comparatively investigated. In this study, by taking the shale of the seventh member of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Ordos Basin, China, as a case study, we performed an integrated characterization on the two types of bitumen. The characterization was carried out on source rocks and reservoir assemblages at two scales: lamina-scale (organic-rich lamina and silty lamina) and lithofacies-scale (shale and sandstone). Programmed temperature pyrolysis (Rock-Eval 7 pyrolysis), gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), and Raman spectroscopy were used in this study. The samples are distributed within a 12 m interval and therefore should have experienced the same degree of thermal stress. However, maturity parameters derived from GC–MS for EB and Raman spectroscopy for SB exhibit a different inferred thermal maturity between source rocks and reservoirs at both lithofacies- and lamina-scales. The side-chain scission reactions related (non-)biomarker parameters such as Ts/C 30 H, Σ n C 21− /Σ n C 22+ alkanes, relative C 21 + C 22 sterane content and TA(I)/TA(I + II) suggest higher thermal maturity in source rocks (shale and organic-rich lamina) than the corresponding reservoirs (sandstone and silty lamina), while Raman-derived parameters RBS and G-FWHM indicate higher maturity in reservoirs than the corresponding source rocks. It is speculated that the EB measured by GC–MS comprises saturated and aromatic components corresponding to relatively mobile hydrocarbons. The maturation of the source rock exerts greater control over this component than that of the reservoir. In comparison, the SB measured using Raman spectroscopy mainly consists of solid residue left behind after migration and/or decomposition of a once-liquid oil phase that is less readily able to move. It is more intensely altered by the organic–inorganic interactions (mineral dissolution–precipitation processes) in the reservoir than that in the source rock, resulting in a consolidated SB with higher aromaticity. The storage ability of silty lamina in shale may complicate the data interpretation of geochemical differences in EB- and SB-derived parameters. On a practical note, when assessing thermal maturity, taking into the account the lithology or rock texture, which affects the organic–inorganic interactions, as well as specific components detected by different techniques may provide helpful clues to explain some contradictory results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]