Search

Abstract Background Cornelia de Lange (CdLS) is a rare genetic disorder that affects most body systems. Variants in multiple genes including NIPBL and SMC1A, can cause the syndrome. To date, literature on genotype–phenotype associations in individuals with CdLS is extremely limited, although studies suggest some differences in clinical phenotype severity across variants. This study aimed to examine and compare neurobehavioral differences and developmental variability across CdLS genes, specifically NIPBL and SMC1A, and identify genotype–phenotype correlations. Participants and methods This patient-reported outcomes study included accessing data from the Coordination of Rare Diseases registry at Sanford. Parents of a total of 26 children/adults with CdLS and a known variant in NIPBL (Mean age = 20.46 years, SD = 11.21) and 12 with a known variant in SMC1A (Mean age = 11.08 years, SD = 9.04) completed a series of questionnaires regarding their child’s developmental history. This included attainment of common language and motor milestones, intervention history, and behavior functioning. Developmental history and reported behavior regulation difficulties were compared across variant groups. Results Overall, individuals with a pathogenic variant in NIPBL or SMC1A were similarly delayed across motor and language milestones with about 70% not using phrase speech and 30–50% not walking by 5 years of age. However, those with NIPBL variants showed more severity in behavioral phenotype, namely with more repetitive behaviors, tantrums, and withdrawn behaviors. In addition, these individuals were more likely than those with SMC1A variants to demonstrate self-injurious behaviors, and anxiety. Both groups yielded a similar proportion of participants who participated in speech and occupational therapy, however those with SMC1A variants were more likely to engage in physical therapy. Both clinical groups report low rate of communicative or assistive device use despite a large proportion of participants never mastering single word or sentence use. Conclusions Study results are consistent with recent investigations highlighting more severe behavioral phenotype, particularly autistic features, anxiety, and behavior regulation challenges, among those with NIPBL variants albeit comparable developmental milestones. Both groups endorsed very elevated attention problems. Findings highlight importance of early interventions, including behavioral health services.

Abstract Background Hypermobile Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) are debilitating conditions. Diagnosis is currently clinical in the absence of biomarkers, and criteria developed for adults are difficult to use in children and biologically immature adolescents. Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) is a prerequisite for hEDS and generalized HSD. Current literature identifies a large proportion of children as hypermobile using a Beighton score ≥ 4 or 5/9, the cut off for GJH in adults. Other phenotypic features from the 2017 hEDS criteria can arise over time. Finally, many comorbidities described in hEDS/HSD are also seen in the general pediatric and adolescent population. Therefore, pediatric specific criteria are needed. The Paediatric Working Group of the International Consortium on EDS and HSD has developed a pediatric diagnostic framework presented here. The work was informed by a review of the published evidence. Observations The framework has 4 components, GJH, skin and tissue abnormalities, musculoskeletal complications, and core comorbidities. A Beighton score of ≥ 6/9 best identifies children with GJH at 2 standard deviations above average, based on published general population data. Skin and soft tissue changes include soft skin, stretchy skin, atrophic scars, stretch marks, piezogenic papules, and recurrent hernias. Two symptomatic groups were agreed: musculoskeletal and systemic. Emerging comorbid relationships are discussed. The framework generates 8 subgroups, 4 pediatric GJH, and 4 pediatric generalized hypermobility spectrum disorders. hEDS is reserved for biologically mature adolescents who meet the 2017 criteria, which also covers even rarer types of Ehlers–Danlos syndrome at any age. Conclusions This framework allows hypermobile children to be categorized into a group describing their phenotypic and symptomatic presentation. It clarifies the recommendation that comorbidities should be defined using their current internationally accepted frameworks. This provides a foundation for improving clinical care and research quality in this population.