Search

Background: Congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) are a group of rare metabolic diseases with heterogeneous presentations, leading to substantial diagnostic challenges, which are poorly understood. Therefore, this study aims to elucidate this diagnostic journey by examining families' and professionals' experiences. Results and discussion: A questionnaire was designed for CDG families and professionals, garnering 160 and 35 responses, respectively. Analysis revealed the lack of seizures as a distinctive feature between PMM2-CDG (11.2%) with Other CDG (57.7%) at symptom onset. Hypotonia and developmental disability were prevalent symptoms across all studied CDG. Feeding problems were identified as an early onset symptom in PMM2-CDG (Cramer's V (V) = 0.30, False Discovery Rate (FDR) = 3.8 × 10− 9), and hypotonia in all studied CDG (V = 0.34, FDR = 7.0 × 10− 3). The average time to diagnosis has decreased in recent years (now ~ 3.9 years), due to advancements namely the increased use of whole genome and exome sequencing. However, misdiagnoses remain prevalent (PMM2-CDG – 44.9%, non-PMM2-CDG – 64.8%). To address these challenges, we propose adapting medical training to increase awareness of CDG and other rare diseases, ongoing education for physicians, the development of educational resources for relevant medical units, and empowerment of families through patient organizations and support networks. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the crucial role of community-centered research, and the insights families can offer to enhance CDG management. By pinpointing existing gaps and needs, our findings can inform targeted interventions and support systems to improve the lives of those impacted by CDG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) are a group of rare metabolic diseases with heterogeneous presentations, leading to substantial diagnostic challenges, which are poorly understood. Therefore, this study aims to elucidate this diagnostic journey by examining families’ and professionals’ experiences. Results and discussion A questionnaire was designed for CDG families and professionals, garnering 160 and 35 responses, respectively. Analysis revealed the lack of seizures as a distinctive feature between PMM2-CDG (11.2%) with Other CDG (57.7%) at symptom onset. Hypotonia and developmental disability were prevalent symptoms across all studied CDG. Feeding problems were identified as an early onset symptom in PMM2-CDG (Cramer’s V (V) = 0.30, False Discovery Rate (FDR) = 3.8 × 10− 9), and hypotonia in all studied CDG (V = 0.34, FDR = 7.0 × 10− 3). The average time to diagnosis has decreased in recent years (now ~ 3.9 years), due to advancements namely the increased use of whole genome and exome sequencing. However, misdiagnoses remain prevalent (PMM2-CDG – 44.9%, non-PMM2-CDG – 64.8%). To address these challenges, we propose adapting medical training to increase awareness of CDG and other rare diseases, ongoing education for physicians, the development of educational resources for relevant medical units, and empowerment of families through patient organizations and support networks. Conclusion This study emphasizes the crucial role of community-centered research, and the insights families can offer to enhance CDG management. By pinpointing existing gaps and needs, our findings can inform targeted interventions and support systems to improve the lives of those impacted by CDG.

Abstract Background Lipodystrophy syndromes are a heterogeneous group of rare, life-limiting diseases characterized by a selective loss of adipose tissue and severe metabolic complications. There is a paucity of information describing the experiences and challenges faced by physicians who have seen and treated patients with lipodystrophy. This study aimed to provide a better understanding of the physician’s perspective regarding the patient journey in lipodystrophy, including diagnosis, the burden of disease, and treatment approaches. Methods Thirty-three physicians from six countries who had seen or treated patients with lipodystrophy were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Interviews were transcribed, anonymized, and analyzed for themes and trends. Four main themes were developed: (1) the diagnostic journey in lipodystrophy including the disease features or ‘triggers’ that result in the onward referral of patients to specialist medical centers with experience in managing lipodystrophy; (2) the impact of lipodystrophy on patient quality of life (QoL); (3) the use of standard therapies and leptin replacement therapy (metreleptin) in lipodystrophy, and (4) barriers to metreleptin use. Results Participants reported that, due to their rarity and phenotypic heterogeneity, lipodystrophy cases are frequently unrecognized, leading to delays in diagnosis and medical intervention. Early consultation with multidisciplinary specialist medical teams was recommended for suspected lipodystrophy cases. The development and progression of metabolic complications were identified as key triggers for the referral of patients to specialist centers for follow-up care. Participants emphasized the impact of lipodystrophy on patient QoL, including effects on mental health and self-image. Although participants routinely used standard medical therapies to treat specific metabolic complications associated with lipodystrophy, it was acknowledged that metreleptin was typically required in patients with congenital generalized lipodystrophy and in some acquired generalized and partial lipodystrophy cases. A lack of experience among some participants and restrictions to access remained as barriers to metreleptin use. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies describing the qualitative experiences of physicians regarding the diagnosis and management of lipodystrophy. Other physician-centered studies may help increase the awareness of lipodystrophy among the wider medical community and support clinical approaches to this rare disease.

Background: Lipodystrophy syndromes are a heterogeneous group of rare, life-limiting diseases characterized by a selective loss of adipose tissue and severe metabolic complications. There is a paucity of information describing the experiences and challenges faced by physicians who have seen and treated patients with lipodystrophy. This study aimed to provide a better understanding of the physician's perspective regarding the patient journey in lipodystrophy, including diagnosis, the burden of disease, and treatment approaches. Methods: Thirty-three physicians from six countries who had seen or treated patients with lipodystrophy were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Interviews were transcribed, anonymized, and analyzed for themes and trends. Four main themes were developed: (1) the diagnostic journey in lipodystrophy including the disease features or 'triggers' that result in the onward referral of patients to specialist medical centers with experience in managing lipodystrophy; (2) the impact of lipodystrophy on patient quality of life (QoL); (3) the use of standard therapies and leptin replacement therapy (metreleptin) in lipodystrophy, and (4) barriers to metreleptin use. Results: Participants reported that, due to their rarity and phenotypic heterogeneity, lipodystrophy cases are frequently unrecognized, leading to delays in diagnosis and medical intervention. Early consultation with multidisciplinary specialist medical teams was recommended for suspected lipodystrophy cases. The development and progression of metabolic complications were identified as key triggers for the referral of patients to specialist centers for follow-up care. Participants emphasized the impact of lipodystrophy on patient QoL, including effects on mental health and self-image. Although participants routinely used standard medical therapies to treat specific metabolic complications associated with lipodystrophy, it was acknowledged that metreleptin was typically required in patients with congenital generalized lipodystrophy and in some acquired generalized and partial lipodystrophy cases. A lack of experience among some participants and restrictions to access remained as barriers to metreleptin use. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies describing the qualitative experiences of physicians regarding the diagnosis and management of lipodystrophy. Other physician-centered studies may help increase the awareness of lipodystrophy among the wider medical community and support clinical approaches to this rare disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1INH) is a genetic rare disease characterized by recurrent, transient and unpredictable episodes of cold, non-pruriginous oedema without associated urticaria. The characteristics of the disease have a considerable impact on the quality of life of patients. The aim of this study was to increase understanding of the patient journey of HAE in Spain. Methods A multidisciplinary committee of 16 HAE experts (allergy, immunology, emergency department, hospital pharmacy and nursing) and 3 representatives of the Spanish Hereditary Angioedema Patient Association (AEDAF) who were patients or caregivers participated in the study. A review of the publications on HAE treatment was performed. Semi-structured interviews were performed to HAE experts, patients, or caregivers. Three meetings with the experts, patients and caregivers were held to share, discuss, and validate data obtained from literature and interviews and to build the model. Results Throughout the project, the patient journey has been drawn up, dividing it into the stages of pre-diagnosis, diagnosis and treatment/follow-up. Some areas for improvement have been identified. Firstly, there is a need to enhance awareness and training on HAE among healthcare professionals, with a particular emphasis on primary care and emergency department personnel. Secondly, efforts should be made to minimize patient referral times to allergy/immunology specialists, ensuring timely access to appropriate care. Thirdly, it is crucial to encourage the study of the relatives of diagnosed patients to early identify potential cases. Fourthly, equitable access to self-administered treatments should be ensured, facilitated by systems that enable medication delivery at home and proper education and training for patients. Equitable access to long-term prophylactic treatment should also be prioritized for all patients in need. To standardize HAE management, the development of consensus guidelines that reduce variability in clinical practice is essential. Lastly, promoting research studies to enhance knowledge of the disease and align its treatment with new developments in the healthcare field should be encouraged. Conclusions The knowledge of the patient journey in HAE allowed us to identify improvement areas with the final aim to optimize the disease management.

Background Hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1INH) is a genetic rare disease characterized by recurrent, transient and unpredictable episodes of cold, non-pruriginous oedema without associated urticaria. The characteristics of the disease have a considerable impact on the quality of life of patients. The aim of this study was to increase understanding of the patient journey of HAE in Spain. Methods A multidisciplinary committee of 16 HAE experts (allergy, immunology, emergency department, hospital pharmacy and nursing) and 3 representatives of the Spanish Hereditary Angioedema Patient Association (AEDAF) who were patients or caregivers participated in the study. A review of the publications on HAE treatment was performed. Semi-structured interviews were performed to HAE experts, patients, or caregivers. Three meetings with the experts, patients and caregivers were held to share, discuss, and validate data obtained from literature and interviews and to build the model. Results Throughout the project, the patient journey has been drawn up, dividing it into the stages of pre-diagnosis, diagnosis and treatment/follow-up. Some areas for improvement have been identified. Firstly, there is a need to enhance awareness and training on HAE among healthcare professionals, with a particular emphasis on primary care and emergency department personnel. Secondly, efforts should be made to minimize patient referral times to allergy/immunology specialists, ensuring timely access to appropriate care. Thirdly, it is crucial to encourage the study of the relatives of diagnosed patients to early identify potential cases. Fourthly, equitable access to self-administered treatments should be ensured, facilitated by systems that enable medication delivery at home and proper education and training for patients. Equitable access to long-term prophylactic treatment should also be prioritized for all patients in need. To standardize HAE management, the development of consensus guidelines that reduce variability in clinical practice is essential. Lastly, promoting research studies to enhance knowledge of the disease and align its treatment with new developments in the healthcare field should be encouraged. Conclusions The knowledge of the patient journey in HAE allowed us to identify improvement areas with the final aim to optimize the disease management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundTenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a rare, locally aggressive neoplasm arising from the synovium of joints, bursae, and tendon sheaths affecting small and large joints. It represents a wide spectrum ranging from minimally symptomatic to massively debilitating. Most findings to date are mainly from small, retrospective case series, and thus the morbidity and actual impact of this rare disease remain to be elucidated. This study prospectively explores the management of TGCT in tertiary sarcoma centers.MethodsThe TGCT Observational Platform Project registry was a multinational, multicenter, prospective observational study involving 12 tertiary sarcoma centers in 7 European countries, and 2 US sites. This study enrolled for 2 years all consecutive ≥ 18 years old patients, with histologically diagnosed primary or recurrent cases of diffuse-type TGCT. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were collected at baseline and every 6 months for 24 months. Quality of life questionnaires (PROMIS-PF and EQ-5D) were also administered at the same time-points. Here we report baseline patient characteristics.Results166 patients were enrolled between November 2016 and March 2019. Baseline characteristics were: mean age 44 years (mean age at disease onset: 39 years), 139/166 (83.7%) had prior treatment, 71/166 patients (42.8%) had ≥ 1 recurrence after treatment of their primary tumor, 76/136 (55.9%) visited a medical specialist ≥ 5 times, 66/116 (56.9%) missed work in the 24 months prior to baseline, and 17/166 (11.6%) changed employment status or retired prematurely due to disease burden. Prior treatment consisted of surgery (i.e., arthroscopic, open synovectomy) (128/166; 77.1%) and systemic treatments (52/166; 31.3%) with imatinib (19/52; 36.5%) or pexidartinib (27/52; 51.9%). Treatment strategies at baseline visits consisted mainly of watchful waiting (81/166; 48.8%), surgery (41/166; 24.7%), or targeted systemic therapy (37/166; 22.3%). Patients indicated for treatment reported more impairment compared to patients indicated for watchful waiting: worst stiffness NRS 5.16/3.44, worst pain NRS 6.13/5.03, PROMIS-PF 39.48/43.85, and EQ-5D VAS 66.54/71.85.ConclusionThis study confirms that diffuse-type TGCT can highly impact quality of life. A prospective observational registry in rare disease is feasible and can be a tool to collect curated-population reflective data in orphan diseases. Name of registry: Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors (TGCT) Observational Platform Project (TOPP).Trial registration numberNCT02948088. Date of registration: 10 October 2016. URL of Trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02948088?term=NCT02948088&draw=2 .

Abstract Background Patient journey maps are increasingly used as a tool that enables healthcare providers to refine their service provision to best meet patient needs. We developed a cervical dystonia patient journey map (CDPJM) that describes the holistic patient experience from pre-diagnosis through to long-term treatment. Methods The CDPJM was developed in 2 stages; a patient survey (open questions and multichoice) of 15 patients with CD was conducted to inform the design of the CDPJM, which was then refined and validated by an expert-patient focus group. Results Qualitative analysis of the patient survey supported five key stages of the patient journey: symptom onset, diagnosis and therapeutic relationship with healthcare professionals, initiation of care for CD, start of CD treatment, and living with treated CD. Following symptom onset, survey respondents described having multiple visits to their family doctor who prescribed strong pain killers and muscle relaxants and referred their patient to up to 10 different specialists for diagnosis. Over half (53.3%) of respondents had received ≥ 1 misdiagnosis. Respondents reported relief at having a diagnosis but a lack of understanding of the prognosis and treatment options; 46.7% said their neurologist did not spend enough time addressing their concerns. Survey respondents reported using a variety of alternative sources of information, including the internet (86.7%), self-help groups (66.7%) and information leaflets provided by health care professionals (60.0%). While botulinum toxin (BoNT) was consistently discussed as the main treatment option, some neurologists also mentioned physiotherapy, counselling, and other complementary approaches. However, patients were often left to seek complementary services themselves. Patients reported a ‘rollercoaster’ of relief with BoNT treatment with symptoms (and subsequent impact on daily life) returning towards the end of an injection cycle. “When BoNT works well I can return to an almost normal life … when the injections stop working so well, I have to rest more and avoid going to work and experience life restrictions.” Conclusions We present the first patient journey map for CD that can be used to guide local service mapping and to compare current provision with what patients say they want and need.

Abstract Background Lysosomal Storage Diseases (LSDs) are a group of Rare Diseases (RDs) caused by lysosomal enzyme deficiencies. Patients with LSDs suffer from a wide range of symptoms with a strong impact in their daily routines. In this study we aimed to explore the impact of the disease on the lives of patients with four LSDs, as well as how they experience Patient Journey from diagnosis to follow up. Unmet Needs (UNs) perceived by patients and clinicians were assessed to have a better understanding of which initiatives could improve LSDs management and especially those that could result in an improvement of patients’ quality of life. Methods Qualitative research was the research methodology selected for the study. It provides plentiful and holistic insights into people’s views and actions. The study was conducted through in-depth face-to-face semi-structured interviews. Results In total, 20 patients and 25 Health Care Professionals (HCPs) from different Spanish regions were interviewed. Patients perceived that the highest impact of the LSDs was on their daily routines, specifically on their emotional side, their work/school environment, their family and their social life. Regarding the Patient Journey experience, the worst perceived stage was the pre-diagnosis, where patients only reported negative perceptions, being the delay in diagnosis and misdiagnosis the most commented issues. On the contrary, the follow-up stage was the one with less negative perceptions. Overall, patients and HCPs agreed on the priority UNs, such as accelerating diagnosis, reducing bureaucracy for the treatment access and a more coordinated attention for the patients, not only among different physicians but also with other professionals such as genetic counselors or social workers. Conclusions Our data shows that there are still UNs to be addressed from the perspective of patients and HCPs. The main UN is accelerating diagnosis, which could be achieved by medical awareness and education, according to clinicians. A more comprehensive disease management was another main point to be worked on to improve LSD-patient experience and quality of life.

Abstract Background Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a rare, locally aggressive neoplasm arising from the synovium of joints, bursae, and tendon sheaths affecting small and large joints. It represents a wide spectrum ranging from minimally symptomatic to massively debilitating. Most findings to date are mainly from small, retrospective case series, and thus the morbidity and actual impact of this rare disease remain to be elucidated. This study prospectively explores the management of TGCT in tertiary sarcoma centers. Methods The TGCT Observational Platform Project registry was a multinational, multicenter, prospective observational study involving 12 tertiary sarcoma centers in 7 European countries, and 2 US sites. This study enrolled for 2 years all consecutive ≥ 18 years old patients, with histologically diagnosed primary or recurrent cases of diffuse-type TGCT. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were collected at baseline and every 6 months for 24 months. Quality of life questionnaires (PROMIS-PF and EQ-5D) were also administered at the same time-points. Here we report baseline patient characteristics. Results 166 patients were enrolled between November 2016 and March 2019. Baseline characteristics were: mean age 44 years (mean age at disease onset: 39 years), 139/166 (83.7%) had prior treatment, 71/166 patients (42.8%) had ≥ 1 recurrence after treatment of their primary tumor, 76/136 (55.9%) visited a medical specialist ≥ 5 times, 66/116 (56.9%) missed work in the 24 months prior to baseline, and 17/166 (11.6%) changed employment status or retired prematurely due to disease burden. Prior treatment consisted of surgery (i.e., arthroscopic, open synovectomy) (128/166; 77.1%) and systemic treatments (52/166; 31.3%) with imatinib (19/52; 36.5%) or pexidartinib (27/52; 51.9%). Treatment strategies at baseline visits consisted mainly of watchful waiting (81/166; 48.8%), surgery (41/166; 24.7%), or targeted systemic therapy (37/166; 22.3%). Patients indicated for treatment reported more impairment compared to patients indicated for watchful waiting: worst stiffness NRS 5.16/3.44, worst pain NRS 6.13/5.03, PROMIS-PF 39.48/43.85, and EQ-5D VAS 66.54/71.85. Conclusion This study confirms that diffuse-type TGCT can highly impact quality of life. A prospective observational registry in rare disease is feasible and can be a tool to collect curated-population reflective data in orphan diseases. Name of registry: Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors (TGCT) Observational Platform Project (TOPP). Trial registration number: NCT02948088. Date of registration: 10 October 2016. URL of Trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02948088?term=NCT02948088&draw=2 .

Background: Patient journey maps are increasingly used as a tool that enables healthcare providers to refine their service provision to best meet patient needs. We developed a cervical dystonia patient journey map (CDPJM) that describes the holistic patient experience from pre-diagnosis through to long-term treatment.Methods: The CDPJM was developed in 2 stages; a patient survey (open questions and multichoice) of 15 patients with CD was conducted to inform the design of the CDPJM, which was then refined and validated by an expert-patient focus group.Results: Qualitative analysis of the patient survey supported five key stages of the patient journey: symptom onset, diagnosis and therapeutic relationship with healthcare professionals, initiation of care for CD, start of CD treatment, and living with treated CD. Following symptom onset, survey respondents described having multiple visits to their family doctor who prescribed strong pain killers and muscle relaxants and referred their patient to up to 10 different specialists for diagnosis. Over half (53.3%) of respondents had received ≥ 1 misdiagnosis. Respondents reported relief at having a diagnosis but a lack of understanding of the prognosis and treatment options; 46.7% said their neurologist did not spend enough time addressing their concerns. Survey respondents reported using a variety of alternative sources of information, including the internet (86.7%), self-help groups (66.7%) and information leaflets provided by health care professionals (60.0%). While botulinum toxin (BoNT) was consistently discussed as the main treatment option, some neurologists also mentioned physiotherapy, counselling, and other complementary approaches. However, patients were often left to seek complementary services themselves. Patients reported a 'rollercoaster' of relief with BoNT treatment with symptoms (and subsequent impact on daily life) returning towards the end of an injection cycle. "When BoNT works well I can return to an almost normal life … when the injections stop working so well, I have to rest more and avoid going to work and experience life restrictions."Conclusions: We present the first patient journey map for CD that can be used to guide local service mapping and to compare current provision with what patients say they want and need. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lysosomal Storage Diseases (LSDs) are a group of Rare Diseases (RDs) caused by lysosomal enzyme deficiencies. Patients with LSDs suffer from a wide range of symptoms with a strong impact in their daily routines. In this study we aimed to explore the impact of the disease on the lives of patients with four LSDs, as well as how they experience Patient Journey from diagnosis to follow up. Unmet Needs (UNs) perceived by patients and clinicians were assessed to have a better understanding of which initiatives could improve LSDs management and especially those that could result in an improvement of patients' quality of life.Methods: Qualitative research was the research methodology selected for the study. It provides plentiful and holistic insights into people's views and actions. The study was conducted through in-depth face-to-face semi-structured interviews.Results: In total, 20 patients and 25 Health Care Professionals (HCPs) from different Spanish regions were interviewed. Patients perceived that the highest impact of the LSDs was on their daily routines, specifically on their emotional side, their work/school environment, their family and their social life. Regarding the Patient Journey experience, the worst perceived stage was the pre-diagnosis, where patients only reported negative perceptions, being the delay in diagnosis and misdiagnosis the most commented issues. On the contrary, the follow-up stage was the one with less negative perceptions. Overall, patients and HCPs agreed on the priority UNs, such as accelerating diagnosis, reducing bureaucracy for the treatment access and a more coordinated attention for the patients, not only among different physicians but also with other professionals such as genetic counselors or social workers.Conclusions: Our data shows that there are still UNs to be addressed from the perspective of patients and HCPs. The main UN is accelerating diagnosis, which could be achieved by medical awareness and education, according to clinicians. A more comprehensive disease management was another main point to be worked on to improve LSD-patient experience and quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Limited data are available on the experiences of patients with autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs) and their families along the path to diagnosis and treatment. We sought to describe these experiences in patients with AIDs including tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), mevalonate kinase deficiency/hyperimmunoglobulin D syndrome (MKD/HIDS), and familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). Methods Ninety-minute, semi-structured qualitative interviews and 5-day written/video diaries were used to gather information on the experiences of patients with AIDs and their families. Results Twelve families of patients from the US (TRAPS [n = 4], MKD/HIDS [n = 5], FMF [n = 5]) participated in this study from August to November 2015. The study included two families with multiple afflicted siblings. Patients’ ages ranged from 1 to 28 years. Most parents reported realizing that something was seriously wrong with their child after medical emergencies and/or hospitalizations, which initiated the difficult path to diagnosis. For most, the process included multiple specialist visits, extensive and repeated testing, and many misdiagnoses. Over time, 92% of parents reported losing confidence in the healthcare system’s ability to find an answer to their child’s symptoms, while they also struggled with unsupportive school personnel and dismissive friends and relatives. Patients and their parents reported holding on to memories of “what life was like” before the onset of symptoms and mourning their subsequent loss of “normalcy.” Even after diagnosis, patients and parents continued to feel uncertain about what to expect in the future. Conclusions All families emphasized the need for efficient early diagnosis of AIDs. Initiatives that improve the speed and accuracy of diagnosis, provide more comprehensive patient education, and support patients and families through the illness have the potential to significantly improve the quality of life of patients with AIDs and their families. Healthcare providers should be aware of the impact of the long diagnostic journey on families and work to create an environment of trust and collaboration in the face of a difficult and prolonged diagnostic process.