Search

Background: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), which includes anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), is a technically demanding procedure and limited data exist on the relationship between case volume and complications. We sought to identify volume thresholds for TSA, aTSA, and rTSA at which risk of a major surgical complication decreased and to compare complications of patients treated by high-volume surgeons with those of patients treated by low-volume surgeons., Materials and Methods: Primary, elective TSAs (aTSA and rTSA) from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, were identified in the Premier Healthcare Database. Multivariable logistic regression with restricted cubic splines modeled the relationship between annual TSA, aTSA, and rTSA surgeon volume and 90-day risk of major surgical complications. The 90-day complications of patients treated by high- and low-volume surgeons were compared., Results: From 2016 to 2019, 3177 surgeons performed 78,639 TSAs. Increasing annual volume was associated with decreasing major surgical complication risk (thresholds: 50 TSAs, 25 aTSAs, and 36 rTSAs). High- and low-volume surgeons performed 24,595 and 54,044 TSAs, respectively. Patients of high-volume surgeons had lower risk of major surgical complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.84), myocardial infarction (aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.97), and readmission (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.62-0.81). Importantly, 74.9% of high-volume and 93.0% of low-volume surgeon-year units had major surgical complication rates below the mean of all recorded surgeons., Conclusion: While most high- and low-volume surgeons had major surgical complication rates below the cohort average, increasing TSA volume was associated with a decreased risk of complications. [ Orthopedics . 2025;48(1):e15-e21.]., Competing Interests: Disclosure: NDH has received royalties from Corin U.S.A.; is a consultant for Corin U.S.A., Intellijoint Surgical, MicroPort Orthopedics, and Zimmer; holds a leadership role in the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, and American Joint Replacement Registry; and holds stock in Intellijoint Surgical. SCG has received royalties from Zimmer Biomet Holdings; is a consultant for Exactech Inc; and has received support for travel from Micromed Inc and Arthrex. AEW is a consultant for Stryker Corporation and has received support for travel from Arthrex. JNL has received royalties from Stryker Corporation, Smith & Nephew, and Merz North America Inc and holds a leadership role in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Arthroscopy Association of North America. FAP is a consultant for Exactech Inc, Smith & Nephew, Zimmer Biomet, Flexion Therapeutics, Stryker Corporation, and DePuy Synthes. The remaining authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

Background: The goal of this study was to evaluate differences in carpal tunnel release volume, reimbursement, practice styles, and patient populations between male and female surgeons from 2013 to 2021., Materials and Methods: The Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners database was queried from 2013 to 2021. Procedure volume, reimbursement, surgeon information, and patient demographic characteristics were collected for any surgeon who performed at least 10 open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) or endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) procedures that year. The Welch t test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and multivariable linear regressions were conducted to compare male and female surgeons and analyze geographic and annual differences., Results: From 2013 to 2021, the proportion of carpal tunnel releases performed by female surgeons increased for OCTR by 4.5% (7.1% to 11.6%) and for ECTR by 3.3% (4.8% to 8.1%). Female OCTR surgeons on average had fewer beneficiaries per surgeon (443.37 vs 354.20, P <.001), performed fewer billable services per beneficiary (6.37 vs 5.35, P =.03), and performed fewer unique billable services (91.13 vs 77.79, P <.001) compared with male surgeons. Female OCTR surgeons also saw a lower percentage of White patients (88.14 vs 86.48, P =.003) and a higher percentage of female patients (60.06 vs 61.70, P <.001) and dual-enrolled Medicare-Medicaid patients (10.54 vs 11.22, P =.046)., Conclusion: Female representation among OCTR and ECTR surgeons increased across the country. Male OCTR surgeons billed for more services and performed more services per beneficiary and also treated a higher proportion of White patients and dual Medicare-Medicaid enrollees compared with female surgeons. Future studies are required to identify reasons for and ways to address these disparities. [ Orthopedics . 2025;48(1):57-63.]., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

Background: It is unclear how pediatric orthopedic surgeons are geographically distributed relative to their patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the geographic distribution of pediatric orthopedic surgeons in the United States., Materials and Methods: County-level data of actively practicing pediatric orthopedic surgeons were identified by matching several registries and membership logs. Data were used to calculate the distance between counties and nearest surgeon. Counties were categorized as "surgeon clusters" or "surgeon deserts" if the distance to the nearest surgeon was less than or greater than the national average and the average of all neighboring counties, respectively. Cohorts were then compared for differences in population characteristics using data obtained from the 2020 American Community Survey., Results: A total of 1197 unique pediatric orthopedic surgeons were identified. The mean distance to the nearest pediatric orthopedic surgeon for a patient residing in a surgeon desert or a surgeon cluster was 141.9±53.8 miles and 30.9±16.0 miles, respectively. Surgeon deserts were found to have lower median household incomes ( P <.001) and greater rates of children without health insurance ( P <.001). Multivariate analyses showed that higher Rural-Urban Continuum codes ( P <.001), Area Deprivation Index scores ( P <.001), and percentage of patients without health insurance ( P <.001) all independently required significantly greater travel distances to see a pediatric orthopedic surgeon., Conclusion: Pediatric orthopedic surgeons are not equally distributed in the United States, and many counties are not optimally served. Additional studies are needed to identify the relationship between travel distances and patient outcomes and how geographic inequalities can be minimized. [ Orthopedics . 2024;47(4):e204-e210.].

Objective: This study sought to understand trends in industry payments for research awarded to orthopedic surgeons., Materials and Methods: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments database was queried for the years 2016 to 2021 for industry payments for research. Financial analyses were performed to understand temporal trends and differences by orthopedic subspecialty and principal investigator characteristics such as sex. The threshold for statistical significance was set at .05., Results: A total of 2014 orthopedic surgeons were identified, among whom 542 adult reconstruction (27%) and 460 sports medicine (23%) surgeons were major beneficiaries. Seventy-one female orthopedic surgeons comprised the minority (4%). Total research payments awarded during the study period aggregated to $266,633,592, with adult reconstruction ($88,819,047; 33%) and sports medicine ($57,949,822; 22%) receiving the highest amounts. Total research payments awarded trended upward yearly except for a decline in 2020 that subsequently rebounded ( P <.001). Median annual research payment per orthopedic surgeon was $13,375. Median total industry payments per orthopedic surgeon differed between specialties ( P <.001), with the highest amounts for adult reconstruction ($44,063) and sports medicine ($34,567) and the lowest amounts for hand ($12,052) and foot and ankle ($19,233). Median total payments did not differ significantly when stratified by sex ( P =.276) and region ( P =.906). Specialties in which the respective top three companies offered the majority of the research funding were musculoskeletal oncology (90%), pediatric orthopedics (66%), and shoulder and elbow (64%)., Conclusion: These results can be used as a primer for orthopedic surgeons seeking to leverage industry relationships to fund translational research. [ Orthopedics . 2024;47(3):172-178.].

Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures are common and often require surgical intervention by an orthopedic surgeon, who may or may not have pediatric subspecialty training. This study used a large national database to assess for potential differences in perioperative outcomes for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures treated by pediatric and nonpediatric orthopedists. A retrospective comparative cohort analysis was performed using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project-Pediatric (NSQIP-P) database 2012 to 2017. Patients 1 to 11 years old were assessed. Demographics, comorbidities, and the incidence of adverse outcomes were compared between pediatric and nonpediatric orthopedists using multivariate analysis controlling for patient characteristics. A total of 15,831 patients were included in the study. Of these, 85.2% were treated by pediatric orthopedists and 14.8% were treated by nonpediatric orthopedists. Demographics, comorbidity burden, operative time, and hospital length of stay were not significantly different between the study groups. With multivariate analysis controlling for patient factors, no differences were identified for 30-day adverse events, reoperation, or readmission whether surgery was performed by pediatric or nonpediatric orthopedists. Considering self-selection of surgeons who perform surgery for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures, no differences in hospital or general outcome metrics were identified based on who performed these procedures. [ Orthopedics . 2021;44(2):e203-e210.].

Physician rating websites (PRWs) rate physicians based on experiences of previous patients. Although a high rating is desirable, it may not correlate with quality of care, experience, or other physician-specific variables. This study examined the impact of physician-specific variables, such as American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Sports Certificate of Added Qualification (CAQ) status, years in practice, sex, and geographic location, on the PRW patient satisfaction rating and number of ratings. A list of orthopedic sports medicine surgeons was obtained from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine database. Demographic data were recorded. Surgeon profiles were gathered from the most commonly used PRWs (Healthgrades and Vitals), and a mean rating value was recorded on a 1- to 5-star scale. The t test and analysis of variance were used for comparisons. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors contributing to PRW ratings. Female sex had the biggest positive effect on PRW rating ( R =0.04, P =.029). The PRW rating was positively affected by the number of ratings ( R =0.04, P <.001) and negatively affected by an increase in years of practice ( R =0.04, P <.001). Surgeons with fewer than 10 years in practice had higher PRW ratings than surgeons practicing longer than 10 years. The PRW ratings were not affected by sports CAQ status or geographic location. Fewer years in practice, female sex, and greater number of reviews were associated with higher PRW ratings. Number of reviews was the only modifiable factor. There was no observed association between sports medicine CAQ status and PRW rating. [ Orthopedics . 2021;44(2):e281-e286.].

Ulnar artery thrombosis (UAT) occurs most commonly in athletes and manual laborers who repeatedly use their palm in high-impact activities. Anecdotal evidence has shown an increased prevalence of UAT in orthopedic surgeons, especially in joint arthroplasty surgeons, compared with the general population. This study sought to determine the prevalence of UAT among orthopedic surgeons and to identify risk factors for developing UAT. Eighty orthopedic surgeons and residents were included in the study. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire, and a timed Allen test was performed on each hand with the radial artery occluded. A reperfusion result greater than 6 seconds was considered abnormal. Participants with a positive Allen test and UAT-associated symptoms were deemed to have UAT. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact and Wilcox-on rank-sum tests. The prevalence of UAT was 11% (9 of 80) in the study population compared with 1.6% (21 of 1300) in the general population (P<.0001). For surgeons with 15 years or more of practice, the UAT rate was 24% (8 of 33) compared with 2% (1 of 47) for surgeons with less than 15 years of practice (P=.0030). The prevalence of UAT in adult reconstruction surgeons trended toward significance at 40% (2 of 5) compared with 9% (7 of 75) in the other subspecialties (P=.095). Orthopedic surgeons have an increased risk for developing UAT compared with the general population. The risk of UAT is significantly correlated with advancing years in clinical practice and may be associated with the number of arthroplasty cases performed. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(5):e415-e422.]., (Copyright 2019, SLACK Incorporated.)

In accordance with the Physician Payment Sunshine Act, all industry payments to physicians in the United States have become publicly available. Previous research has indicated that orthopedic surgeons receive the greatest amount of industry compensation compared with other surgical subspecialists. However, the relationship between this compensation and research productivity is less clear. This study sought to investigate the relationship between consulting fees paid to orthopedic surgeons and academic productivity. Using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments Database, this study identified 2555 orthopedic surgeons who received at least one industry consulting fee in 2015. Physicians who received total consulting fees of at least $20,000 (US) were stratified into the high payment group. The number of publications and the h-index for each physician were used as metrics of scholarly impact. Mean publication number and h-index for the high payment group were compared with all other physicians in the sample using an independent-samples t test. A total of 2555 orthopedic surgeons received consulting payments totaling $62,323,143 in 2015. The mean consulting payment was $24,393 (SD, $45,465). The publication number was greater for the high payment group (mean, 61.6; SD, 135.6) compared with all other physicians in the sample (mean, 36.1; SD, 95.6). Additionally, the mean h-index for the high payment group was 13.7 (SD, 14.3) compared with 10.0 (SD, 11.6) for all other orthopedic surgeons. These findings indicate that the orthopedic surgeons who receive more in industry consulting fees are also those who contribute most substantially to the body of orthopedic literature. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(3):137-142.]., (Copyright 2019, SLACK Incorporated.)

Recent studies have shown that applicants to the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II examination are performing fewer procedures outside of their chosen subspecialty. In this study, the authors assessed whether trainees are beginning their subspecialization during residency. The authors reviewed the chosen fellowships and case logs of 231 residents graduating from 5 academic orthopedic residency training programs from 2002 to 2017. The number of cases logged by residents who chose a specialty was then compared with the number of cases logged by residents who chose other specialties. Residents who chose spine surgery (108.4±50.7 vs 74.4±60.2, P<.01), hand surgery (242.2±92.9 vs 194.3±78.2, P<.01), and sports medicine (278.5±105.8 vs 229.0±93.9, P<.01) performed significantly more procedures in their chosen fields than their colleagues. In contrast, for total joint arthroplasty (P=.18) and foot and ankle surgery (P=.46), there was no significant difference in the number of cases between residents who chose the sub-specialty and those who did not. Residents pursuing careers in spine surgery, hand surgery, and sports medicine obtained additional operative exposure to their chosen field during residency. Formalizing this early experience with specialization tracks during the chief year may be considered. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(1):e39-e43.]., (Copyright 2018, SLACK Incorporated.)

Orthopedic surgeons have become increasingly subspecialized, and recent studies have shown that American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Step II applicants are performing a higher percentage of their cases within their chosen subspecialties. However, these studies focused exclusively on surgeons who have completed a single fellowship; little data exist on those who pursue a second fellowship. All applicants to the ABOS Part II examination from 2004 to 2016 were classified by their self-reported fellowship training history using the ABOS Part II examination database. Trends in the number of applicants completing multiple fellowships and the types of fellowships combined were analyzed. In addition, cases performed by applicants who had performed multiple fellowships were analyzed to determine what percentage were within their chosen subspecialties. A total of 9776 applicants to ABOS Part II were included in the database from 2004 to 2016, including 444 (4.5%) applicants who completed more than one fellowship. There were 43 different combinations of fellowships; the most common additional fellowships were trauma (40.1%), sports medicine (38.7%), and joints (30.4%). The most common combinations were joints and sports medicine (10.6%) and foot and ankle and sports medicine (10.1%). A significant increase occurred in physicians training in both pediatric orthopedics and sports medicine (P=.02). The percentage of cases within the applicants' chosen specialties ranged from 91.4% in sports to 73.6% in tumor. Multiple fellowship applicants represent a small percentage of all applicants, and although subspecialization in orthopedics is increasing, no increasing trend toward multiple fellowships within this dataset was observed. However, the significant increase in applicants who combined pediatric orthopedic and sports medicine fellowships suggests an increasing interest in treating this increasing patient population in addition to social and economic factors. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(1):e33-e37.]., (Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.)

Recently, providers have begun to publicly report the results of patient satisfaction surveys from their practices. However, these outcomes have never been compared with the findings of commercial online physician rating websites. The goals of the current study were to (1) compare overall patient satisfaction ratings for orthopedic surgeons derived from provider-based third-party surveys with existing commercial physician rating websites and (2) determine the association between patient ratings and provider characteristics. The authors identified 12 institutions that provided publicly available patient satisfaction outcomes derived from third-party surveys for their orthopedic surgeons as of August 2016. Orthopedic surgeons at these institutions were eligible for inclusion (N=340 surgeons). Provider characteristics were recorded from publicly available data. Four high-traffic commercial online physician rating websites were identified: Healthgrades.com, UCompareHealthCare.com, Vitals.com, and RateMDs.com. For each surgeon, overall ratings (on a scale of 1-5), total number of ratings, and percentage of negative ratings were compared between provider-initiated internal ratings and each commercial online website. Associations between baseline factors and overall physician ratings and negative ratings were assessed. Provider-initiated internal patient satisfaction ratings showed a greater number of overall patient ratings, higher overall patient satisfaction ratings, and a lower percentage of negative comments compared with commercial online physician rating websites. A greater number of years in practice had a weak association with lower internal ratings, and an academic practice setting and a location in the Northeast were protective factors for negative physician ratings. Compared with commercial online physician rating websites, provider-initiated patient satisfaction ratings of orthopedic surgeons appear to be more favorable, with greater numbers of responses. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(5):304-310.]., (Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.)