Search

HYPOTHESIS: Insertion of cochlear implant electrodes generates transient pressure spikes within the vestibular labyrinth equivalent to high intensity acoustic stimuli. BACKGROUND: Though cochlear implant (CI) surgery is regarded as having low-risk of impacting the vestibular system, several studies have documented changes in vestibular function after implantation. The mechanism of these changes is not understood. We have previously established that large, potentially-damaging pressure transients can be generated in the cochlea during electrode insertion, but whether pressure transients occur within the vestibular labyrinth has yet to be determined. Here, we quantify the exposure of the vestibular system to potentially-damaging pressure transients during CI surgery. METHODS: Five human cadaveric heads were prepared with an extended facial recess and implanted sequentially with eight different CI electrode styles via a round window approach. Fiber-optic sensors measured intralabyrinthine pressures in scala vestibuli (SV), scala tympani (ST), and the lateral semicircular canal (LSCC) during insertions. RESULTS: Electrode insertion produced a range of high-intensity pressure spikes simultaneously in the cochlea and LSCC with all electrodes tested. Pressure transients recorded were found to be significantly higher in the vestibular labyrinth than the cochlea and occurred at peak levels known to cause acoustic trauma. CONCLUSION: Insertion of CI electrodes can produce transients in intralabyrinthine fluid pressure levels equivalent to high-intensity, impulsive acoustic stimuli. Results from this investigation affirm the importance of atraumatic surgical techniques and suggest that in addition to the cochlea, the vestibular system is potentially exposed to damaging fluid pressure waves during cochlear implantation.

Hypothesis: A cochlear implant electrode within the cochlea contributes to the air-bone gap (ABG) component of postoperative changes in residual hearing after electrode insertion. Background: Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation has gained importance as simultaneous electric-acoustic stimulation allows for improved speech outcomes. Postoperative loss of residual hearing has previously been attributed to sensorineural changes; however, presence of increased postoperative ABG remains unexplained and could result in part from altered cochlear mechanics. Here, we sought to investigate changes to these mechanics via intracochlear pressure measurements before and after electrode implantation to quantify the contribution to postoperative ABG. Methods: Human cadaveric heads were implanted with titanium fixtures for bone conduction transducers. Velocities of stapes capitulum and cochlear promontory between the two windows were measured using single-axis laser Doppler vibrometry and fiber-optic sensors measured intracochlear pressures in scala vestibuli and tympani for air- and bone-conducted stimuli before and after cochlear implant electrode insertion through the round window. Results: Intracochlear pressures revealed only slightly reduced responses to air-conducted stimuli consistent with previous literature. No significant changes were noted to bone-conducted stimuli after implantation. Velocities of the stapes capitulum and the cochlear promontory to both stimuli were stable after electrode placement. Conclusion: Presence of a cochlear implant electrode causes alterations in intracochlear sound pressure levels to air, but not bone, conducted stimuli and helps to explain changes in residual hearing noted clinically. These results suggest the possibility of a cochlear conductive component to postoperative changes in hearing sensitivity.

Hypothesis Cochlear implants (CIs) designed for hearing preservation will not alter mechanical properties of the middle and inner ears as measured by intracochlear pressure (P(IC)) and stapes velocity (Vstap). Background CIs designed to provide combined electroacoustic stimulation are now available. To maintain functional acoustic hearing, it is important to know if a CI electrode can alter middle or inner ear mechanics because any alteration could contribute to elevated low-frequency thresholds in electroacoustic stimulation patients. Methods Seven human cadaveric temporal bones were prepared, and pure-tone stimuli from 120 Hz to 10 kHz were presented at a range of intensities up to 110 dB sound pressure level. P(IC) in the scala vestibuli (P(SV)) and tympani (PST) were measured with fiber-optic pressure sensors concurrently with VStap using laser Doppler vibrometry. Five CI electrodes from two different manufacturers with varying dimensions were inserted via a round window approach at six different depths (16-25 mm). Results The responses of P(IC) and VStap to acoustic stimulation were assessed as a function of stimulus frequency, normalized to sound pressure level in the external auditory canal, at baseline and electrode-inserted conditions. Responses measured with electrodes inserted were generally within approximately 5 dB of baseline, indicating little effect of CI electrode insertion on P(IC) and VStap. Overall, mean differences across conditions were small for all responses, and no substantial differences were consistently visible across electrode types. Conclusion Results suggest that the influence of a CI electrode on middle and inner ear mechanics is minimal despite variation in electrode lengths and configurations.

HYPOTHESIS Bone-anchored hearing systems (BAHSs) provide sound location-dependent input to the normal ear for reducing the head shadow effect in the case of single-sided deafness (SSD). BACKGROUND Patients with SSD can be fit with a BAHS positioned on the impaired side. Despite successful outcomes and some reports of spatial hearing capabilities, little data are available regarding the physiologic performance of BAHSs in response to free-field sounds. METHODS Cochlear microphonics (CMs) were recorded from five chinchillas before and after destruction of one cochlea. A BAHS (Cochlear Baha) was fitted on the deafened side. CM measurements were made in response to tones, with and without the BAHS, to free-field sounds presented ipsilateral to the SSD, on the side of the normal ear, and along the midline. Stimuli were also presented directly through the BAHS and an earphone to generate sounds with interaural time and level differences approximating free-field sounds. RESULTS With the BAHS, CM thresholds were decreased (re: no BAHS) by approximately 10 dB for sources ipsilateral to the SSD, approximately 14 dB for midline sources, and approximately 5 dB for sources contralateral to the SSD. Changes in CM amplitudes and thresholds were sound location dependent. CM amplitudes were modulated by interaural time and level differences generated by the linear interaction of BAHS and acoustic signals. CONCLUSION This study suggests that BAHS can provide input to the normal ear that is modulated by sound location, which serves to reduce the head shadow effect and may also offer cues to sound location.

Long-term retained foreign bodies in the human body have been reported across many specialties, but relatively few exist in the ENT literature.We present a case report of a patient with a broken dental needle fragment in the posterior oral cavity with subsequent migration to the cochlea over the course of 4 years, eventually leading to hearing loss. CT scan and middle ear exploration demonstrated a 4-cm metallic fragment abutting the base of the cochlea, immediately adjacent to the internal carotid artery.The needle segment was removed through an endaural approach without complication.Postoperatively, the patient had improvements in PTA and speech discrimination, as well as the resolution of chronic otalgia and jaw pain. Imaging, audiologic results, and surgical details and pictures are presented herein.To our knowledge, based on a thorough PubMed and Google Scholar search, there are no reports of such a foreign body migration from the oral cavity to the skull base.

Mechanical stimulation through a cochlear third window into the scala tympani in a chinchilla model with normal and fixed stapes can generate cochlear responses equivalent to acoustic stimuli.Cochlear stimulation via the round window (RW) using active middle ear implants (AMEIs) can produce physiologic responses similar to acoustic stimulation including in a model of stapes fixation. However, pathologic conditions, such as advanced otosclerosis, can preclude delivery of sound energy to the cochlea through the oval window and/or the RW.Cochlear microphonic (CM) and laser Doppler vibrometer measurements of stapes and RW velocities were performed in 6 ears of 4 chinchillas. Baseline measurements to acoustic sinusoidal stimuli (0.25-8 kHz) were made. Measurements were repeated with an AMEI driving the RW or a third window to the scala tympani before and after stapes fixation.AMEI stimulation of the third window produced CM waveforms with morphologies similar to acoustic stimuli. CM thresholds with RW and third-window stimulation were frequency dependent but ranged from 0.25 to 10 and 0.5 to 40 mV, respectively. Stapes fixation, confirmed by laser Doppler vibrometer measurements, resulted in a significant frequency dependent impairment in CM thresholds up to 13 dB (at3 kHz) for RW stimulation and a nonsignificant frequency-dependent improvement of up to 10 dB (at3 kHz) via third-window stimulation.AMEI mechanical stimulation through a third window into the scala tympani produces physiologic responses nearly identical to acoustic stimulation including in a model of stapes fixation with decreased efficiency.

Objective To compare the speech understanding abilities of cochlear implant listeners using 2 microphone technologies, the Otologics fully implantable Carina and the Cochlear Freedom microphones. Study design Feasibility study using direct comparison of the 2 microphones, nonrandomized and nonblinded within case studies. Setting Tertiary referral center hospital outpatient clinic. Patients Four subjects with greater than 1 year of unilateral listening experience with the Freedom Cochlear Implant and a CNC word score higher than 40%. Intervention A Carina microphone coupled to a percutaneous plug was implanted on the ipsilateral side of the cochlear implant. Two months were allowed for healing before connecting to the Carina microphone. The percutaneous plug was connected to a body worn external processor with output leads inserted into the auxiliary port of the Freedom processor. Subjects were instructed to use each of the 2 microphones for half of their daily implant use. Main outcome measures Aided pure tone thresholds, consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC), Bamford-Kowel-Bench Speech in Noise test (BKN-SIN), and Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. Results All subjects had sound perceptions using both microphones. The loudness and quality of the sound was judged to be poorer with the Carina in the first 2 subjects. The latter 2 demonstrated essential equivalence in the second two listeners, with the exception of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit reporting greater percentage of problems for the Carina in the background noise situation for subject 0011-003PP. CNC word scores were better with the Freedom than the Carina in all 4 subjects. The latter 2 showed improved speech perception abilities with the Carina, compared with the first 2. The BKB-SIN showed consistently better results with the Freedom in noise. Conclusion Early observations indicate that it is potentially feasible to use the fully implanted Carina microphone with the Freedom Cochlear Implant. The authors would anticipate that outcomes would improve as more knowledge is gained in signal processing and with the fabrication of an integrated device.

HYPOTHESIS: Mechanical stimulation of the round window (RW) with an active middle ear implant (AMEI) with and without experimentally induced stapes fixation (SF) results in equivalent electrophysiologic measures of cochlear microphonic (CM), compound action potential (CAP), and auditory brainstem response (ABR). BACKGROUND: Where normal oval window functionality is mitigated, the RW provides a pathway to mechanically stimulate the inner ear. METHODS: Measurements of the CM, CAP, and ABR were made in 5 ears of 4 chinchillas with acoustic stimulation and with application of the AMEI to the RW with and without experimentally induced SF using pure-tone stimuli (0.25-20 kHz) presented at differing intensities (-20 to 80 dB SPL vs. 0.01 mV to 3.16 V). RESULTS: Morphologies of the CM, CAP, and ABR were similar between acoustic and RW stimulation with and without SF. Stapes fixation increased CM thresholds relative to RW stimulation without fixation by a frequency-dependent 4- to 13-dB mV (mean, 7.9 +/- 3.2 dB mV). Although the thresholds changed with SF, CM sensitivities and amplitude dynamic range were identical to normal. The CAP in all conditions demonstrated equivalent decreasing amplitudes and increasing latency with decreasing intensity (decibel sound pressure level versus decibel millivolt). Stapes fixation increased the CAP thresholds at all frequencies, ranging from 9 to 24 dB mV (mean, 17.7 +/- 4.9 dB mV). Auditory brainstem response waveforms were preserved across experimental conditions. CONCLUSION: Mechanical stimulation of the RW in an animal model of SF generates functionally similar inputs to the cochlea as normal acoustic and RW mechanical inputs but with increased thresholds. With further study, AMEIs may provide a surgical option for correction of otosclerosis and ossicular chain disruption.

HYPOTHESIS The goal of this study was to measure the tissue vibration amplitude that would be associated with an implantable microphone. BACKGROUND Totally implantable hearing devices have been desired by the hard-of-hearing community for some time. However, an implanted microphone must pick up desired acoustic signals in the presence of undesired signals, including vibration. To design an effective microphone, the level of tissue vibrations originating from anatomical sources and the implanted transducer must be understood. METHODS Using a laser Doppler vibrometer and an accelerometer, tissue vibrations were measured under the following conditions: (1) Normal control subjects during vocalization (n=4); (2) Vocalization and biological sounds measured on cranium and in soft tissue on normal subjects (n=6); (3) Transducer vibration measured on Otologics semi-implantable hearing device wearer (n=1) and human cadavers (n=4 ears). RESULTS Anatomical noise vibrations are 20 to 25 dB greater in soft tissue for frequencies less than 1,000 Hz than on the cranium, whereas vibrations due to implanted transducers are 20 to 25 dB greater on the cranium than in soft tissue inferior to the mastoid. Chewing vibrations are 10 to 15 dB greater than vocalization on the mastoid. Mastoid vibration levels measured in patients are equivalent to those in cadavers. Vibration levels do not vary significantly with respect to location on the cranium next to the pinna. CONCLUSION The greatest anatomical vibrations that an implanted microphone must overcome are because of vocalization in the soft tissue inferior to the mastoid and chewing vibrations on the mastoid. A human cadaver is an appropriate model for transducer cranial vibration studies. If the implantable microphone is placed on the cranium near the pinna, it makes little difference with regard to actual location.

Because of the diminishing number of patients diagnosed with otosclerosis, the adequacy of residency training in stapedectomy techniques remains controversial. A prospective study, conducted from 1986 to 1991, assessed whether or not surgical outcome obtained by residents, under close supervision by otologic faculty, could be improved using a single stapedectomy technique. Comparison of pre- and postoperative hearing results (pure-tone averages of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz) from 49 cases revealed closure of the air-bone gap to within 10 dB in 68 percent of procedures. Complications included failure to improve the conductive hearing loss, tympanic membrane perforations, transient facial nerve weakness, subluxation of the incus, and adhesions. The failure to improve the success rate in resident-performed procedures relates to the individual learning curve and the limited number of training cases.