Search

Background: Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). However, results in non‐ICM (NICM) patients are not satisfactory, and studies comparing differences between NICM and ICM are limited. We conducted a meta‐analysis of procedural characteristics and long‐term outcomes of catheter ablation for VA, comparing results between ICM and NICM. Methods: Studies in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed. Four studies reporting comparison of catheter ablation of VA between ICM and NICM were examined. The Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale was used to appraise study quality. A random‐effects model with inverse variance method was used for comparisons. Results: Epicardial approach was significantly more undertaken for the NICM group than in the ICM group (odds ratio [OR]: 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09‐0.18; P <.00001). Mean ablation time (P =.54), fluoroscopy time (P =.55), and procedural time (P =.18) did not differ significantly between the ICM and NICM groups. Procedural failure rates (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.24‐0.89; P =.02) and VA recurrence rates (risk ratio [RR]: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.46‐1.01; P =.06) were significantly higher in the NICM group than in the ICM group. However, all‐cause mortality (RR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.75‐2.49; P =.31) did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: Procedural failure and VA recurrence rates were significantly higher in the NICM group, despite significantly more frequent epicardial access. These highlight the limitations of catheter ablation for VA in NICM, given our current knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins (PVs) is widely used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). Successful ablation requires occluding the PVs by cryoballoon. Angiography is a standard method of assessing PV occlusion. To decrease contrast doses and overcome potential contraindications (e.g., allergy to contrast, renal disease), alternative methods have been tested, including intracardiac echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography-color flow Doppler, and distal cryoballoon pressure monitoring. Objective We evaluated pressure monitoring's accuracy in detecting PV occlusion during cryoballoon ablation. Methods We studied 72 PVs in 18 nonconsecutive patients (mean age 68 ± 8 years; 13 male) who underwent cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal AF. In 67 PVs, we documented the point at which the recorded pressure waveform at the distal tip of the inflated cryoballoon transformed from a left atrial into a pulmonary arterial pressure waveform. PV occlusion was confirmed by concurrent PV angiography through the distal balloon channel. Occlusion was rated on a I-IV scale in which I indicated poor occlusion with major leakage and IV indicated complete occlusion without leakage. Results In 43 of 67 PVs (64%), the change in the pressure waveform from left atrial to pulmonary arterial was associated with complete PV occlusion (grade IV), confirmed by angiography. In the other 24 PVs, complete occlusion was achieved by further movement of the cryoballoon under intracardiac echocardiographic guidance and angiographic confirmation. All 67 PVs were electrically isolated with cryoballoon. Conclusions The change in pressure waveforms at the distal tip of inflated cryoballoon is not a reliable predictor of complete PV occlusion during cryoballoon ablation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Assessment of ventricular activation pattern is critical to the successful ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). We have previously shown that the global atrial activation pattern during tachycardia can be rapidly and accurately assessed by calculating the postpacing interval variability (PPIV); PPIV was minimal in circuitous tachycardias and highly variable in centrifugal tachycardias. In the present study, we use the PPIV to determine the ventricular global activation pattern during VT. Methods: Patients with mappable VT were included. We defined global ventricular activation as either centrifugal (arising from a focus with radial expansion) or circuitous (gross macro-reentrant circuit), based on the findings of electroanatomic mapping. PPIV was calculated as the difference in postpacing interval with right ventricular apical overdrive pacing during tachycardia at cycle lengths (CL) 10 ms and 30-ms shorter than tachycardia, regardless of the origin of the tachycardia. We studied 20 patients with 23 VTs (11 centrifugal, mean CL 390 ± 36.1 ms; 12 circuitous, mean CL 418 ± 75.7 ms). Results: The mean PPIV was 45 ± 16 ms for patients with centrifugal VT and 6.7 ± 4.1 ms for patients with circuitous VT. Rank sum analysis of PPIV showed a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Our data suggest that the global ventricular activation pattern during VT can be rapidly and accurately defined by assessing the PPIV. This technique allows for a rapid confirmation of the tachycardia activation and significantly facilitates mapping and ablation. (PACE 2010; 33:129–134) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]