Search

Hemodynamic optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can be achieved reproducibly and--with bulky, nonimplantable equipment--noninvasively. We explored whether a simple photoplethysmogram signal might be used instead.Twenty patients (age 65 ± 12) with CRT underwent automatic atrioventricular (AV) delay optimization, using a multiple-transitions protocol, at two atrially paced heart rates: just above sinus rate ("slow ApVp," 77 ± 11 beats per minute [bpm]) and 100 bpm ("fast ApVp"). We then retested to assess short-term reproducibility.All 80 optimizations identified an optimum (correctly oriented parabola). At 100 bpm, the simple photoplethysmogram had wider scatter between repeat optimizations than did Finometer: standard deviation of difference (SDD) 22 ms versus 14 ms, respectively, P = 0.028. The simple photoplethysmogram improved in reproducibility when slope (instead of peak) of its signal was used for optimization, becoming as reproducible as Finometer (SDD 14 ms vs 14 ms, P = 0.50). At slow heart rate, reproducibility of simple photoplethysmogram-based optimization worsened from 14 to 22 ms (P = 0.028), and Finometer-based optimization from 14 to 26 ms (P = 0.005). Increasing the number of replicates averaged improved reproducibility. For example, SDD of simple photoplethysmogram optimization (using peak) fell from 62 ms with two replicates to 22 ms with eight replicates (P0.0001). At 100 bpm, the eight-replicate protocol takes ∼12 minutes.A 12-minute protocol of simple photoplethysmographic AV optimization can be processed fully automatically. Blinded test-retest reproducibility of the optimum AV is good and improves with more replicates. If benefits to some patients are not to be neutralized by harm to others, endpoint studies should first test check narrowness of "within-patient error bars."

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can improve clinical and cardiac structural status in heart failure patients. The role of baseline diastolic echocardiographic parameters to characterize the likelihood of positive outcomes is not well known. We explored relationships between diastolic parameters and outcomes 6 months after CRT implant in the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) Trial.We hypothesized that diastolic echocardiographic parameters were associated with clinical and structural outcomes in CRT patients.For 426 patients in PROSPECT, a prospective observational trial of CRT, baseline E/A ratio, left atrial (LA) area, isovolumic relaxation time, left ventricular inflow deceleration time, E' velocity, and E/E' ratio were evaluated and related to 6-month clinical composite score (CCS) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) reduction using Spearman rank-order correlations. Parameters associated with outcomes were analyzed further by discrete categorization.As continuous variables, only E/A ratio and LA area correlated with CCSs (P = 0.017, P = 0.045, respectively) and relative change in LVESV at 6 months (P0.0001, P = 0.001, respectively). As discrete variables, E/A ratio and LA area also correlated with CCSs and LVESV.Diastolic echo parameters E/A ratio and LA area were associated with clinical and structural outcomes in CRT patients at 6 months.

The role of right bundle branch block (RBBB) for the induction of left ventricular (LV) asynchrony is discussed controversially. The objective of this study was to assess presence and degree of LV asynchrony in patients with RBBB, left bundle branch block (LBBB), or left anterior hemiblock (LAH) and normal LV function.We included 15 patients with RBBB, 13 patients with RBBB and concomitant LAH, 10 patients with pure LBBB, and 100 healthy controls into this study. All patients had normal LV function. Interventricular asynchrony was assessed as the difference of the right and LV ejection delay. Intraventricular delay was obtained by tissue synchronicity imaging-guided tissue Doppler imaging measurement.Interventricular and left intraventricular asynchrony were linked to the presence of an LBBB. No left intraventricular asynchrony was noted during pure RBBB; interventricular delays were negative (aortic flow preceding pulmonary flow) in the presence of RBBB.In patients with normal LV function, intraventricular asynchrony depends on the presence of an LBBB and interventricular asynchrony is inversed in the presence of RBBB.

Objectives:To determine the effect of a posterolateral (PL) left ventricular scar on mortality and morbidity following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods:Sixty-two patients with heart failure (age 67.3 ± 9.6 yrs [mean ± SD], 45 males, New York Heart Association class [NYHA] class III or IV, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]= 35%, left bundle branch block, QRS ≥ 120 ms) underwent late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) for scar imaging. Patients were followed up for 741 (75–1602) days (mean [range]). Results:The presence of a PL scar emerged as an independent predictor of the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for worsening heart failure (HR: 3.06 [1.63, 7.7, P < 0.0001]) as well as the endpoint of cardiovascular death (HR: 2.63 [1.39, 6.65], P = 0.0016). A transmural PL scar was the strongest predictor of these endpoints (both P < 0.0001). The symptomatic responder rate (improvement by ≥1 NYHA classes or ≥25% in 6-min walking distance) was 83% in the group with non-PL scars, but only 47% in the group with transmural PL scars (P < 0.0001). Pacing over the scar was associated with a higher mortality and morbidity than pacing outside the scar (all P < 0.05). Conclusions:A PL scar is associated with a worse clinical outcome following CRT, particularly if it is transmural. Pacing scarred left ventricular myocardium carries a greater risk of mortality and morbidity than pacing nonscarred myocardium.