Search

Background: Appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks are associated with an increased risk of mortality and heart failure (HF) events. The first appropriate shock may occur late after implantation. However, whether the timing of the first appropriate shock influences prognosis is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of the timing of the first appropriate shock in patients with ICD., Methods: This retrospective and observational study enrolled 565 consecutive ICD patients. Patients who received an appropriate shock were divided into the early group (first appropriate shock <1 year after ICD implantation) and late group (first appropriate shock ≥1 year after ICD implantation). All-cause mortality was compared between the two groups., Results: Over a median follow-up of 5.6 years, 112 (19.8%) patients received an appropriate shock, including 32 patients (28.6%) in the early group and 80 patients (71.4%) in the late group. Comparisons of baseline characteristics at ICD implantation revealed that the late group was more likely to receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (66.3% vs. 31.3%, p < 0.001), ICD for primary prevention (60.0% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.001), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker treatment (88.8% vs. 71.9%, p = 0.028). Survival after shock was significantly worse in the late group than in the early group (p = 0.027). In multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, the late group had an increased risk of all-cause mortality compared with the early group (HR: 2.22; 95% CI 1.01-4.53; p = 0.029). In both groups, the most common cause of death was HF., Conclusions: Late occurrence of the first appropriate ICD shock was associated with a worse prognosis compared with early occurrence of the first appropriate shock. Cardiac death was the most common cause of death in patients who experienced late occurrence of the first appropriate ICD shock, resulting from HF in most cases., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

A 42-year-old woman with tricuspid atresia who underwent a Fontan surgery (atrio-pulmonary connection) was admitted to our hospital due to symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT). A defibrillation lead was implanted in a distal site of a coronary vein since there was no usual entry to the ventricle. Ventricular pacing was impossible due to the high threshold, however, good sensing was obtained. Three years later, she felt palpitations and a subsequent shock therapy while climbing stairs. The cardioverter data showed that an appropriate cardioversion therapy successfully converted VT to normal rhythm., (© 2020 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: A challenging decision exists as whether to abandon or remove noninfectious superfluous leads during lead revisions or cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) upgrades. There is insufficient data in the Asian population to guide decision making., Methods: This study investigated the safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extractions (TLEs) in a high-volume Japanese center. Among a total of 341 patients who underwent lead revisions or CIED upgrades between 2008 and 2018, 53 patients (16%) who underwent TLEs to remove the superfluous leads were analyzed., Results: Indications for TLE were vascular issues (60%), recalled leads (21%), growth of the body size (6%), abandoned leads in young patients (6%), switch to a subcutaneous implanted cardiac defibrillator (4%), need for an MRI conditional CIED (2%), and risks of vascular injury (2%). The population included 29 patients (55%) with nonfunctional leads and 24 (45%) with functional abandoned leads. A total of 74 target leads (mean 1.4 leads/person, median lead age 6.7 years) were extracted with a complete removal achieved in 98%. All coexisting leads, intended for continued use, were not damaged. All new leads (mean 1.4 leads/person) that had been simultaneously implanted during the TLE procedures were successfully implanted. There was one minor complication (2%) involving a pericardial effusion but it did not affect the hemodynamics., Conclusions: In this Japanese single center experience, the removal of noninfectious superfluous leads with TLEs seemed to be a safe and effective therapeutic option., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The recent development of high-density high-spatial resolution three-dimensional mapping has provided detailed information for understanding complicated atrial activation patterns at a level not previously possible. Using this technology, we report a case with recurrent common atrial flutter, demonstrating the presence of a bridging epicardial fiber that traveled across the previous cavotricuspid isthmus ablation lesion with apparent epicardial-endocardial breakthrough (EEB) sites located on both sides of the ablation line. The entrainment study indicated that the EEB site, located adjacent to the coronary sinus ostium, was part of the recurrent circuit and a focal ablation targeting that site terminated the tachycardia., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)