Search

Objectives: The perception of being a burden or self-perceived burden (SPB) is associated with suicide ideation in chronic pain patients (CPPs). The objective of this study was to determine if SPB is associated with five types of suicidality (wish to die, active suicide ideation, presence of suicide plan, history of suicide attempts, and preference for death over being disabled) in CPPs and acute pain patients (APPs)., Methods: Affirmation of SPB was statistically compared between community nonpatients without pain (CNPWP), APPs, and CPPs. APPs and CPPs who had affirmed any of the five types of suicidality were compared statistically for affirmation of SPB. Hierarchical regression analysis was utilized to determine the significance of SPB in predicting each of the five types of suicidality in APPs and CPPs controlling for age, gender, race, education status, and two types of measures of depression (current depression and vegetative depression)., Results: APPs and CPPs were statistically more likely to affirm SPB than CNPWPs and CPPs were more likely than APPs to do so. There were no differences between APPs and CPPs in affirming SPB in APPs and CPPs who had affirmed any of the five types of suicidality. In CPPs, SPB predicted each type of suicidality in a significant fashion utilizing both types of depression measures. For APPs, SPB predicted each type of suicidality in a significant fashion except for history of suicide attempt controlling for vegetative depression., Conclusions: SPB is associated with the vast majority of different types of suicidality in APPs and CPPs., (© 2015 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: Somatic/psychiatric symptoms are frequently found in chronic pain patients (CPPs). The objectives of this study were to determine 1) which somatic/psychiatric symptoms are more commonly found in acute pain patients (APPs) and CPPs vs community nonpatients without pain (CNPWPs) and 2) if somatic/psychiatric symptom prevalence differs between APPs and CPPs., Design: The above groups were compared statistically for endorsement of 15 symptoms: fatigue, numbness/tingling, dizziness, difficulty opening/closing mouth, muscle weakness, difficulty staying asleep, depression, muscle tightness, nervousness, irritability, memory, falling, nausea, concentration, and headaches., Results: After controlling for age, gender, and level of pain, APPs and CPPs had a statistically significantly greater prevalence (at a P < 0.01 level) for 11 and 13 symptoms, respectively, vs CNPWPs. After controlling for age, gender, and level of pain, CPPs had a statistically significantly greater prevalence (at a P < 0.01 level) for eight symptoms vs APPs. Symptoms were highly correlated in both APPs and CPPs., Conclusions: CPPs are characterized to a significantly greater extent than comparison groups by somatic/psychiatric symptoms that are highly intercorrelated. This has implications for clinical practice and future research., (Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

OBJECTIVES.: The objectives of this study were to (1) compare the prevalence of smoking within chronic pain patients (CPPs) to community non-patients without pain (CNPWP), community patients with pain (CPWP), and acute pain patients (APPs); and (2) compare smokers to nonsmokers within CPPs, APPs, and CPWP for highest pain level. DESIGN.: CNPWP, CPWP, APPs, and CPPs were compared to each other for smoking status (nonsmoker, less than one pack per day, one pack/day or more, any amount per day). Within CPWP, APPs, and CPPs, smokers were also compared to nonsmokers by t-test for highest reported pain level. For both analyses, sub-analyses were performed controlling for age or gender, or race or education. RESULTS.: Utilizing all available patients, the prevalence of smokers within CPPs was significantly greater vs each of the comparison groups (CNPWP, CPWP, APPs). In the sub-analyses, only CPPs who were 38 or younger or male or White, or had some college or above were at greater risk than CPWP for smoking one pack or greater per day. CPP smokers were not significantly more likely than nonsmokers to have higher pain, and this was confirmed in the sub-analyses. CONCLUSIONS.: The prevalence of smokers could be significantly greater within CPPs vs CPWP. CPPs who smoke do not have higher levels of pain than nonsmoking CPPs., (Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Hypothesis: Passive, active, and historical suicidality are associated with preference for death over disability., Design: Community nonpatients without pain, community patients with pain, and patients with acute and chronic pain were compared for endorsement of disability perception and preference for death over disability. Phi correlations and chi-square analyses were calculated between preference for death over disability and six suicidality items representing passive, active, and historical suicidality. Logistic regression was used to predict preference for death over disability in patients with acute and chronic pain., Results: For patients with acute and chronic pain, endorsement of preference for death over disability correlated significantly with all six suicidality items. The logistic regression models identified the following variables as predictors for preference for death over disability in patients with acute pain: the Behavior Health Inventory (BHI 2) family dysfunction scale, history of wanting to die, and disability perception. For patients with chronic pain, predictors were the BHI 2 Borderline scale, history of wanting to die, treated fairly by family item, frequent suicide ideation, people I trust turn on me item, and disability perception. Preference for death over disability was a statistically significant predictor in patients with chronic pain for disability perception, recent suicide ideation, having a suicidal plan, and a history of wanting to die but was not a significant predictor for any suicide items in patients with acute pain., Conclusion: Preference for death over disability is associated with passive and active suicide ideation and historical suicidality in patients with chronic pain., (Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: 1) Determine and compare prevalence for homicide-suicide (H-S) affirmation in community non-patients (N=478), community patients (N=158), acute pain patients (APPs; N=326), and chronic pain patients (CPPs; N=341); and 2) Develop H-S predictor models in APPs and CPPs., Design: A large set of items containing the H-S item was administered to the above groups, who were compared statistically for H-S endorsement. APPs and CPPs affirming the H-S item were compared with those not affirming on all available variables including the Battery for Health Improvement (BHI 2) with significant variables (P≤ 0.001) utilized in predictor models for H-S in APPs and CPPs., Setting: Community plus rehabilitation facilities., Results: The above population groups affirmed the H-S item according to the following percentages: healthy community 1.88%, community patients 3.16%, rehabilitation patients without pain 3.64%, rehabilitation AAPs 3.99%, and rehabilitation CPPs 4.40%. For both APPs and CPPs, the H-S item was significantly correlated with some suicidality items and some homicide items. The model for APPs identified "having a suicide plan" as being predictive of H-S affirmation. For CPPs, the items of having thoughts of revenge killing, being motivated to seek revenge without any verbal warning, and the Doctor Dissatisfaction Scale of the BHI 2 predicted H-S affirmation. The APPs model classified 96% of the APPs correctly, while the CPPs model classified 97% of the CPPs correctly. These predictor rates, however, were no better than the base rate., Conclusion: The prevalence of H-S affirmation within APPs and CPPs is not insignificant. The APPs predictor model points to a close association between H-S affirmation and suicidality. The CPPs model indicates that there is a close association between H-S affirmation, and anger/hostility and anger directed at physicians. These results, however, should not lead to the belief that CPPs are at greater risk for actual H-S completion for the following reasons: 1) H-S is an extremely rare event; and 2) predictive validity of the H-S item for actual H-S completion has not been determined., (Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)